View other reviews for this product:
ricoute « Sound quality and generally homogeneous with connections »
Published on 12/28/12 at 13:1661 keys
Connections:
- 1 output / line out via 2 RCA / phono for external amplification, stereo / PA / keyboard amp) bie nplmus practice that traditonnels jack 6.35 more connection oriented instruments
- 2 sockets midi in / out (multi-pin)
- 1 USB plug
- 1 input jack pedal to "sustain" jack 6.35
- 1 Mic input (rather unusual in this type of equipment) jack 6.35 level adjustable????
- 1 headphone jack 6.35 (to play in peace and not disturb the neighbors)
After for characteristics see below the data sheet:
Number of keys: 61
Dynamic: 1
Aftertouch: 0
Amplification: 2x8 Watts
Number of sounds: 138
Multi effects: yes
Number of styles: 109
Creating styles: 0
Song capacity: 30
number of initial rhythm: 1
Number of rhythmic purposes: 1
Number of rhythmic variations: 2
Polyphony: 48 Notes
Dual mode: yes
Pitch bend: yes
Transpose: yes
Split: yes
Display: backlit LCD
Sequence: yes
Sequence number of tracks: 1
Input lines: yes 1
Microphone inputs: yes 1
USB: 1
Headphone Jack: yes 1
Dimensions: 940x370x130 cm
Weight 5.7kg
UTILIZATION
The key is nice a bit soft, not heavy touch as an acoustic piano in this range, but acceptable in a game situation and responsive to the touch.
The acoustic system of hp broadband bo ndiamètre hp and a sharp cone provide a uniform and pleasant sound with a hint of natural reverb discreet but noticeable
The manual is quite succinct, no chips or guide but the discovery of the device is also instructive
Initially can be confused with sounds and rhythms, you'll quickly after its marks as well as the display is quite informative with a staff line and positioning knew the keyboard as well as the different functions and effects, so fairly complete
PAs e nmidi tried, I guess it must be in the normal average for this type of equipment
SOUNDS
the sound is a bit clear (but much more open compared to a yam psr 175 that I have owned so good musicianship, even if not absolutely neutral, but at the same time is an arranger keyboard no longer in sound manipulation, although the piano sounds do not déméritent
The expression is rather good
The effects are very diverse and are a good overall homogeneity and exotic traditional sounds may be slightly below the drums on the other hand are very good and some synth sounds so amazing cloths.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for a week, obviously NOHD ude pe decline, but the sound is pretty good, intelligible even at low volume, not loud or aggressive but in a good dynamic gloable
THE only less, despite no usb interface software for the editing but it is not on the target material to choose for this, nor those of comparable models in other brands as well.
THE quality of manufacture and assembly is good, and does not in the economy and compete with brands renomées in the field.
THE R / p / q seems quite successful and better than entry level comparable price casio yamaha and even in comparison to KD 100 no better than it and bcp displaying similarities and ergonomics with a lot more key lea turning wheel (so jog for video editing) of kd-62 is definitely a plus for quick navigation.
So, yes I remake this choice without a doubt, and it can even compete with arranger keyboards more ambitious and more e na underfoot in a dynamic and noise Roland E-09 completely deflated from the ep-07
Initially, I had rather bad aa priori brand pro-Milonga, and I find it more fianlement sésuisant with more potential than a casio or yamaha trancendants not last!
For the story Kd-62 will be replaced by the 50 kd that seems to be that at the acoustic level, significantly lower (no metal grid hp but fine lammelles plastic case probably related to generating resonances, and 2-way abandoned a system so obviously worse in terms of transparency strength of 62 kd.
The 62 kd is informally and formally arrested and will become very rare and it is unfortunate because highly recommendable compared to kd-100 does not bring much more to the more expensive and less kd-50 in terms of quality and a little on price!
Connections:
- 1 output / line out via 2 RCA / phono for external amplification, stereo / PA / keyboard amp) bie nplmus practice that traditonnels jack 6.35 more connection oriented instruments
- 2 sockets midi in / out (multi-pin)
- 1 USB plug
- 1 input jack pedal to "sustain" jack 6.35
- 1 Mic input (rather unusual in this type of equipment) jack 6.35 level adjustable????
- 1 headphone jack 6.35 (to play in peace and not disturb the neighbors)
After for characteristics see below the data sheet:
Number of keys: 61
Dynamic: 1
Aftertouch: 0
Amplification: 2x8 Watts
Number of sounds: 138
Multi effects: yes
Number of styles: 109
Creating styles: 0
Song capacity: 30
number of initial rhythm: 1
Number of rhythmic purposes: 1
Number of rhythmic variations: 2
Polyphony: 48 Notes
Dual mode: yes
Pitch bend: yes
Transpose: yes
Split: yes
Display: backlit LCD
Sequence: yes
Sequence number of tracks: 1
Input lines: yes 1
Microphone inputs: yes 1
USB: 1
Headphone Jack: yes 1
Dimensions: 940x370x130 cm
Weight 5.7kg
UTILIZATION
The key is nice a bit soft, not heavy touch as an acoustic piano in this range, but acceptable in a game situation and responsive to the touch.
The acoustic system of hp broadband bo ndiamètre hp and a sharp cone provide a uniform and pleasant sound with a hint of natural reverb discreet but noticeable
The manual is quite succinct, no chips or guide but the discovery of the device is also instructive
Initially can be confused with sounds and rhythms, you'll quickly after its marks as well as the display is quite informative with a staff line and positioning knew the keyboard as well as the different functions and effects, so fairly complete
PAs e nmidi tried, I guess it must be in the normal average for this type of equipment
SOUNDS
the sound is a bit clear (but much more open compared to a yam psr 175 that I have owned so good musicianship, even if not absolutely neutral, but at the same time is an arranger keyboard no longer in sound manipulation, although the piano sounds do not déméritent
The expression is rather good
The effects are very diverse and are a good overall homogeneity and exotic traditional sounds may be slightly below the drums on the other hand are very good and some synth sounds so amazing cloths.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for a week, obviously NOHD ude pe decline, but the sound is pretty good, intelligible even at low volume, not loud or aggressive but in a good dynamic gloable
THE only less, despite no usb interface software for the editing but it is not on the target material to choose for this, nor those of comparable models in other brands as well.
THE quality of manufacture and assembly is good, and does not in the economy and compete with brands renomées in the field.
THE R / p / q seems quite successful and better than entry level comparable price casio yamaha and even in comparison to KD 100 no better than it and bcp displaying similarities and ergonomics with a lot more key lea turning wheel (so jog for video editing) of kd-62 is definitely a plus for quick navigation.
So, yes I remake this choice without a doubt, and it can even compete with arranger keyboards more ambitious and more e na underfoot in a dynamic and noise Roland E-09 completely deflated from the ep-07
Initially, I had rather bad aa priori brand pro-Milonga, and I find it more fianlement sésuisant with more potential than a casio or yamaha trancendants not last!
For the story Kd-62 will be replaced by the 50 kd that seems to be that at the acoustic level, significantly lower (no metal grid hp but fine lammelles plastic case probably related to generating resonances, and 2-way abandoned a system so obviously worse in terms of transparency strength of 62 kd.
The 62 kd is informally and formally arrested and will become very rare and it is unfortunate because highly recommendable compared to kd-100 does not bring much more to the more expensive and less kd-50 in terms of quality and a little on price!