View other reviews for this product:
chakhal « The best prices in the l »
Published on 11/27/11 at 06:45
Best value:
Excellent
Everything you need as adj t said.
UTILIZATION
Touch is enjoyable even if it is too lightweight and lacking certain sensations hammers. 10 to touch
The configuration gnrale is affordable but the organization and configuration are trsdsagrables or even dsesprantes when discovering the device. The presets are stored haphazardly. We do not know what you're gonna drop or what to change to get the desired sound. I have to try everything by trial and error and now I use it almost a dozen that I took. Sucks when compared to the simplicity of competition o we choose a CATEGORY and then the instrument and the instrument o default effects that go well. I will not m'tendre: test them to understand what I mean.
SOUNDS
Excellent sounds of piano, electric piano and organ. Everything you need. Low helpful. Groundwater and drinking leads. For other instruments (string, brass, choir ...) blah, blah, but I've never seen a machine that makes for my taste.
The term is - say (well this is how understand it) the link between ll'intention pianist when he supported and the volume and timbre of the sound that comes out is better than the Roland , Korg and Nord. For me it is normal that Yamaha is the matre the above has always done since only Yamaha acoustic pianos.
He yaa priori any effect you need and they are trs convincing. Qualiseurs amps and pianos are from two samples only (conccurrence to sell more) lots of pianos Different. And rotary speakers are amazing organs.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for a year and a half.
Before buying it I tried several times MODELS Korg, Roland and Nord around 2000. I also compared to CP1 without understanding how CP1 could be twice as expensive.
As I said above I like his pianos, organs and pianos reading. J'apprcie not necessarily rhythm box and the physical potentiomtres.
Trs good quality price ratio either from competition as compared to other models in the range (CP1 me trs expensive just to give the impression that it is much better and CP50 Economic and specially not much less).
I would do this because I want to choose a keyboard 2000 that is as versatile a good piano, circa 2000, even if I would be sad not being able to take the Roland RD700nx.
UTILIZATION
Touch is enjoyable even if it is too lightweight and lacking certain sensations hammers. 10 to touch
The configuration gnrale is affordable but the organization and configuration are trsdsagrables or even dsesprantes when discovering the device. The presets are stored haphazardly. We do not know what you're gonna drop or what to change to get the desired sound. I have to try everything by trial and error and now I use it almost a dozen that I took. Sucks when compared to the simplicity of competition o we choose a CATEGORY and then the instrument and the instrument o default effects that go well. I will not m'tendre: test them to understand what I mean.
SOUNDS
Excellent sounds of piano, electric piano and organ. Everything you need. Low helpful. Groundwater and drinking leads. For other instruments (string, brass, choir ...) blah, blah, but I've never seen a machine that makes for my taste.
The term is - say (well this is how understand it) the link between ll'intention pianist when he supported and the volume and timbre of the sound that comes out is better than the Roland , Korg and Nord. For me it is normal that Yamaha is the matre the above has always done since only Yamaha acoustic pianos.
He yaa priori any effect you need and they are trs convincing. Qualiseurs amps and pianos are from two samples only (conccurrence to sell more) lots of pianos Different. And rotary speakers are amazing organs.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for a year and a half.
Before buying it I tried several times MODELS Korg, Roland and Nord around 2000. I also compared to CP1 without understanding how CP1 could be twice as expensive.
As I said above I like his pianos, organs and pianos reading. J'apprcie not necessarily rhythm box and the physical potentiomtres.
Trs good quality price ratio either from competition as compared to other models in the range (CP1 me trs expensive just to give the impression that it is much better and CP50 Economic and specially not much less).
I would do this because I want to choose a keyboard 2000 that is as versatile a good piano, circa 2000, even if I would be sad not being able to take the Roland RD700nx.