View other reviews for this product:
Davedoudou
Published on 03/31/08 at 13:40
Same as above
UTILIZATION
The config is a mathesis universalis: c of a paradigm in its time, a technological species to synthtiseur!
Fast Fashion The sound is complex, a basic knowledge of both analog modlisation Year at the level acoustic / physical VL with sound combinations of AWM2, couples or not, including the selected algorithms offer sound reproduction still virtual fab. The edition is fairly simple for a novice, for example.
The effects are good trs.
I emphasize that this is a synth sound of Fast Fashion more than a workstation! Synth rich o one can extract textures grazed, fat, round, or vice versa, endless ... And that can mimic a lot of sources such as simulating the synths of yesteryear from the best-known brands, American or Japanese ... 70/80!
The manual is a little "catch-all" less likely explanations clear and distinct that help: a jumble sometimes insufficient as it passes most of ct, much information in a sluggish translation for so little about the use of clear!
SOUNDS
All sound sources are authentic and less like what we hear today: that synthtiseur possde primarily a singular grain, a crude state of treatment, by which we can adapt any course Fast Fashion of Sound, a music game whatsoever.
Groundwater is he, as opposed to gnrations postrieures dpourvues since they are constantly reworked as hobbies Stril the game, what is not found in longer Yam today!
The EX5 is not a gas plant: it is just dlicat, effects such as provide the monstrous FDSP, limiting treatment, including treatment of c limits the effect supplmentaire : Synthse overkill but dvor all!
The term is itself sensitive trs: VLOC impressive.
The Sampling type of A3000, yep, blah ... No need for this type of instrument that focused more on the solidity of its synthses that this tool is not exhaustive.
All sound (1 trs BIG BMOL: some piano sounds are catastrophic!) A Z (sf also for drum kits that can be amliors with a little modification sound) is EX-CEL-LENT!
But what happened to this synth moves away from the workstation, so that it dsintresse much?
OVERALL OPINION
I tried some synths in the same era, especially before and also during, and then today, of all latest generation which are sometimes large PRFA 'clone s, but not an own signature sound! And this finitude is progressing from year to year with these entities increasingly labores whose fallacy musical identity no longer has any sound, unless it is an instrument that possde Difference them as the EX5 and many others, the nature of sound, identifiable, has its own characters!
I consider this a synthtiseur intrt paradigmatic (use + 9 years) who served as an example for other future forcment synths but not with the original color, or even with original architecture of the late 90's, which nanmoins food sublimely successful gnrations postrieurement of synths, calls the sweet name of Barbary: workstation!
UTILIZATION
The config is a mathesis universalis: c of a paradigm in its time, a technological species to synthtiseur!
Fast Fashion The sound is complex, a basic knowledge of both analog modlisation Year at the level acoustic / physical VL with sound combinations of AWM2, couples or not, including the selected algorithms offer sound reproduction still virtual fab. The edition is fairly simple for a novice, for example.
The effects are good trs.
I emphasize that this is a synth sound of Fast Fashion more than a workstation! Synth rich o one can extract textures grazed, fat, round, or vice versa, endless ... And that can mimic a lot of sources such as simulating the synths of yesteryear from the best-known brands, American or Japanese ... 70/80!
The manual is a little "catch-all" less likely explanations clear and distinct that help: a jumble sometimes insufficient as it passes most of ct, much information in a sluggish translation for so little about the use of clear!
SOUNDS
All sound sources are authentic and less like what we hear today: that synthtiseur possde primarily a singular grain, a crude state of treatment, by which we can adapt any course Fast Fashion of Sound, a music game whatsoever.
Groundwater is he, as opposed to gnrations postrieures dpourvues since they are constantly reworked as hobbies Stril the game, what is not found in longer Yam today!
The EX5 is not a gas plant: it is just dlicat, effects such as provide the monstrous FDSP, limiting treatment, including treatment of c limits the effect supplmentaire : Synthse overkill but dvor all!
The term is itself sensitive trs: VLOC impressive.
The Sampling type of A3000, yep, blah ... No need for this type of instrument that focused more on the solidity of its synthses that this tool is not exhaustive.
All sound (1 trs BIG BMOL: some piano sounds are catastrophic!) A Z (sf also for drum kits that can be amliors with a little modification sound) is EX-CEL-LENT!
But what happened to this synth moves away from the workstation, so that it dsintresse much?
OVERALL OPINION
I tried some synths in the same era, especially before and also during, and then today, of all latest generation which are sometimes large PRFA 'clone s, but not an own signature sound! And this finitude is progressing from year to year with these entities increasingly labores whose fallacy musical identity no longer has any sound, unless it is an instrument that possde Difference them as the EX5 and many others, the nature of sound, identifiable, has its own characters!
I consider this a synthtiseur intrt paradigmatic (use + 9 years) who served as an example for other future forcment synths but not with the original color, or even with original architecture of the late 90's, which nanmoins food sublimely successful gnrations postrieurement of synths, calls the sweet name of Barbary: workstation!