View other reviews for this product:
tiffa59 « I like this mic but ... »
Published on 11/17/11 at 13:37
Best value:
Excellent
See other opinions
OVERALL OPINION
For this it will be a micro 6 / 10, or "correct".
Explanation: it does not dnature voice, which is not bad dj when used for singing. Small dtail I love: the on / off button. I also put myself in the XLR for the microphone, and I must say it is not so bad, I who used to play with my wireless, at least he does not micro or dcroche the enclosure, and is better! The thing I dislike, and I speak for singers: put yourself ct of the battery, look derrire you, the amp is 100 watts of your guitar: good, bah s going to have to stick the microphone, because we will not be able to mount the enclosure Eternal. It leaves me less freedom of movement from my old, which ignores the lowest range that exists, he had no mm mark, I had bought ads on a site (do no ads).
We will our answer to the question of Audiofanzine when same:
How long have you use it? It's been two months rpt (rock band, has help for those).
Have you tried many before acqurir MODELS? Well my old microphone, and one of the range Shure, but in the shop, and I felt no diffrence its really, I ended up taking it because the cage and not silent bomb on the other, and Dranga me because of my habit.
What is the particular feature you like best and least? Most is not quil dnature not my voice, the less is the fact that it loses power, so to speak thus, when my group goes the sound of the instrumentals.
How do you report quality price? Even when good! PSE if the pros and cons, ultimately, to 50, is a frankly, are more for than against.
With the exprience, this choice would you do? Yes, I think, because like many zikos, I have a budget, and that the microphone is not as dgueulasse that has, for its price. I will be in against trsdgoute for 30 more. However, I do not know yet if I will ascend with scne has it's clear.
OVERALL OPINION
For this it will be a micro 6 / 10, or "correct".
Explanation: it does not dnature voice, which is not bad dj when used for singing. Small dtail I love: the on / off button. I also put myself in the XLR for the microphone, and I must say it is not so bad, I who used to play with my wireless, at least he does not micro or dcroche the enclosure, and is better! The thing I dislike, and I speak for singers: put yourself ct of the battery, look derrire you, the amp is 100 watts of your guitar: good, bah s going to have to stick the microphone, because we will not be able to mount the enclosure Eternal. It leaves me less freedom of movement from my old, which ignores the lowest range that exists, he had no mm mark, I had bought ads on a site (do no ads).
We will our answer to the question of Audiofanzine when same:
How long have you use it? It's been two months rpt (rock band, has help for those).
Have you tried many before acqurir MODELS? Well my old microphone, and one of the range Shure, but in the shop, and I felt no diffrence its really, I ended up taking it because the cage and not silent bomb on the other, and Dranga me because of my habit.
What is the particular feature you like best and least? Most is not quil dnature not my voice, the less is the fact that it loses power, so to speak thus, when my group goes the sound of the instrumentals.
How do you report quality price? Even when good! PSE if the pros and cons, ultimately, to 50, is a frankly, are more for than against.
With the exprience, this choice would you do? Yes, I think, because like many zikos, I have a budget, and that the microphone is not as dgueulasse that has, for its price. I will be in against trsdgoute for 30 more. However, I do not know yet if I will ascend with scne has it's clear.