View other reviews for this product:
« Disappointed! ... »
Published on 08/30/12 at 02:5322/08/11: Nothing transcends add this chapter. The small size is sympathique.8/10
UTILIZATION
22/08/11: RAS (analog pedal without menu inexitant manual, 3 portards to turn the basic ... in basic) - 7/10
SOUND QUALITY
22/08/11: Ouch, that's where it gets tough! ... The sound quality ... View my opinion global.Sinon, I try to use it with either simple (Fender Custom Shop 69 Tele and MIK) or double (Kit of Langcaster Humbuckers). Or in one case or the other I do not remember what I was expecting. Explanation below:
2/10
OVERALL OPINION
22/08/11: In 1977, I had been offered a U.S. Big Muff. Like a triple fool, I lost in a move that I made myself (I'm never recovered). I remember a very cumbersome pedal, but with its insane, so organic.
Fell on the Little Big Muff Reissue with its pocket size, I plunged. Result, I cry more than before the disappearance of my Muff 77. It is light years ahead of the original. It is simple, it is absolutely not the same product, and the effect is, in my eyes (well, my ears) simply sucks.
It fuzz cold (I almost wrote "digital"), where 77 fuzzait warm sustain it a little, where 77 sustainait to death, it compresses madness, where 77 would compress more intelligent or reasoned, and especially the distortion product as a turning signal, a kind of oscillation which, in addition, the effect prématurément.J breath, I put it first on account of the stack. At the same time, the consolidated stack of 77 was ridiculous, so why the news boufferait more? But anyway, stripped of its battery and plugged into my PSU Powerplant is the same story.
This is clearly a purchase that I regret, and has the big drawback to heighten my remorse for having lost my jewel of the time. 3/10
UTILIZATION
22/08/11: RAS (analog pedal without menu inexitant manual, 3 portards to turn the basic ... in basic) - 7/10
SOUND QUALITY
22/08/11: Ouch, that's where it gets tough! ... The sound quality ... View my opinion global.Sinon, I try to use it with either simple (Fender Custom Shop 69 Tele and MIK) or double (Kit of Langcaster Humbuckers). Or in one case or the other I do not remember what I was expecting. Explanation below:
2/10
OVERALL OPINION
22/08/11: In 1977, I had been offered a U.S. Big Muff. Like a triple fool, I lost in a move that I made myself (I'm never recovered). I remember a very cumbersome pedal, but with its insane, so organic.
Fell on the Little Big Muff Reissue with its pocket size, I plunged. Result, I cry more than before the disappearance of my Muff 77. It is light years ahead of the original. It is simple, it is absolutely not the same product, and the effect is, in my eyes (well, my ears) simply sucks.
It fuzz cold (I almost wrote "digital"), where 77 fuzzait warm sustain it a little, where 77 sustainait to death, it compresses madness, where 77 would compress more intelligent or reasoned, and especially the distortion product as a turning signal, a kind of oscillation which, in addition, the effect prématurément.J breath, I put it first on account of the stack. At the same time, the consolidated stack of 77 was ridiculous, so why the news boufferait more? But anyway, stripped of its battery and plugged into my PSU Powerplant is the same story.
This is clearly a purchase that I regret, and has the big drawback to heighten my remorse for having lost my jewel of the time. 3/10