View other reviews for this product:
lgdas
Published on 03/17/06 at 13:41
APRS utlisation two months, it is still thundering Systm: I can not believe that the fate of these little things (the satellites are really, really small).
The subwoofer is good: it does not get any as Submitted Obviously done everything, and we can rgler the bass simply by positioning the chamber Different.
The main quality of this Systm is large enough in its neutrality. A little hollow in mdiums, sr good, but no effect of U qualisation flateuses as some speakers. C'tait what I wanted: something that is close to the monitor speakers while remaining speakers of living ... and small to have room.
This quality is also a default: trs is flat!
Moreover, without being an authorized specialist in I feel the subwoofer eats a lot of power, and I have rgler my amp with my speakers louder Previous yet The same impdance.
Question qualitprix ... it means. We pay a clear design and brand, not acoustics.
I cost a lot of speakers before buying them, including monitoring.
I have especially comparing Boses classic (201 and 301). The 201 is really rather weak: good for a small room, not a salon. The 301 is pretty cool, fairly low / high, but all the same qulibres. I would have taken if the wind did not t the bass reflex rear, forcing the position at least 50 cm from a wall, under penalty of spray acoustics.
The Acoustimass finally another advantage: it is well Dfine (compare Systm of the same range), and the Stereo is very well made even when hair cell is not between the two satellites (they are not directional, which should also contribute to the sense of lower performance).
Other things also galls (budget and place), then I would do the same choice.
With another budget and fewer children home ... not say it!
Oh yes by the way, is a nice thing: taking the hide of the prcaution caison low, the head of friends who believe that the sound comes out as the two satellites ... it's pretty fun
The subwoofer is good: it does not get any as Submitted Obviously done everything, and we can rgler the bass simply by positioning the chamber Different.
The main quality of this Systm is large enough in its neutrality. A little hollow in mdiums, sr good, but no effect of U qualisation flateuses as some speakers. C'tait what I wanted: something that is close to the monitor speakers while remaining speakers of living ... and small to have room.
This quality is also a default: trs is flat!
Moreover, without being an authorized specialist in I feel the subwoofer eats a lot of power, and I have rgler my amp with my speakers louder Previous yet The same impdance.
Question qualitprix ... it means. We pay a clear design and brand, not acoustics.
I cost a lot of speakers before buying them, including monitoring.
I have especially comparing Boses classic (201 and 301). The 201 is really rather weak: good for a small room, not a salon. The 301 is pretty cool, fairly low / high, but all the same qulibres. I would have taken if the wind did not t the bass reflex rear, forcing the position at least 50 cm from a wall, under penalty of spray acoustics.
The Acoustimass finally another advantage: it is well Dfine (compare Systm of the same range), and the Stereo is very well made even when hair cell is not between the two satellites (they are not directional, which should also contribute to the sense of lower performance).
Other things also galls (budget and place), then I would do the same choice.
With another budget and fewer children home ... not say it!
Oh yes by the way, is a nice thing: taking the hide of the prcaution caison low, the head of friends who believe that the sound comes out as the two satellites ... it's pretty fun