I have this mic a great Les Paul copy Sandard (Burny) in the neck position, without cover, and it shows a standard prsence highs, a lot of bass but nothing more. In his clear, it's too clean for me and a lack of body. It plays jazz arrangements, but the great delicacy and great precision is not enough to mask the lack of heat and spice I love all of the same chorus heard in jazz. I put on a Epiphone Les Paul Custom that sounds right to move freely even less to 2 times more expensive, and as the ear is less rich and Dfine, we have a sound is more neutral, less typ. Ca ca dpanne and catches up some of the default of the guitar. It's a good point! In saturation, however it is not bad at all, but there is no good crunch. So niet for the blues, a bad fall, that's what I loved in my heart. I switched to a classic 57 gibson APRS trying an SD 59 neck better suited my taste. It's still a good trs microphone, especially in live as well acute prcis going well in the mix but we play clean, arpges, jazz arrangements, or saturated! like what ... NB, with time and a change of knobs, handle the microphone on the epi LP custom strings and jazz mesh dish is really not bad at all for playing jazz ... and split, gave her an almost sound (see review above) trs cool. Micro trs end and centered on AIGS.

I finally put this microphone in combination with an epiphone SG SH4 a well made a good ten years ... It's great, everything passes, even with the split but still rocks like a guitar blues.Il be 100% mahogany, and is trs trs well. if a table stocky, the sound will be harder and too focused on the treble. Obviously we are talking good violin.
But what have I put on my epi custom jazz? leosound of classic '57 ... a killing.