greg1824
Published on 02/11/05 at 11:02
Best value:
Excellent
Possdant only a Creative Audigy ES, I used the drivers for the KX ASIO. Now I had some compatibility problems in some programs. I was looking for a small price and ASIO j'tais interested by an Audigy 2 ZS when I Discoveries EMU 0404 with effect processor Intgr Jack O 6.35. Exactly what I wanted. And seeking advice on the card I Discoveries Proteus X also offers a powerful software synthtiseur supplmentaire for 50 euros: this is a great deal and I cracked.
My hardware: PC Athlon 2600 + on MSI motherboard 1 GB Ram and 160 hard drive (8MB cache)
Synthtiseur Technics SX-WSA1, Boss SE50, sound mixing with Hinsley.
UTILIZATION
The installation is done in several steps since There's drivers, the program Proteus X sound banks, the updates ... Systm is the easiest but passes without problem.
I had no compatibility problems I run under XP SP1.
Gnrale configuration and a bit complex and it is better for a walk on the documentation provided on the CD. This one is more complete but I have not had time to STUDY for all whether it is complete.
GETTING STARTED
After installation of drivers I immediately added the updates and I have no worries as well.
I am using Cubase SX but I have not done anything with him and Proteus X. Using Proteus X 4ms I go down alone (I can not follow in polyphony 2ms)
OVERALL OPINION
It's been only three days that I have but I wanted to give an opinion quickly because they are rare. Overall I think the are real but not enough trs Varis despite the amount. I think by the bank against General Midi not great. I want to return to the piano sound bank with a t dom Dj assz critical unlike what it sounds There are several piano sounds and I have not any breath. I have even found it quite good. It is somewhat difficult to compare a real piano but compared to other synthtiseur I think he is doing well trs. So I found a lment comparison with my Technics piano sound is superb for a camera in 1996.
On the report quality price EMU has done something fantastic and it is clear that I do not regret my purchase. J'espre able to find other sound banks to see what the Proteus X is still in the wind because they provided, without being bad, are incompltes, especially hip hop east.
My hardware: PC Athlon 2600 + on MSI motherboard 1 GB Ram and 160 hard drive (8MB cache)
Synthtiseur Technics SX-WSA1, Boss SE50, sound mixing with Hinsley.
UTILIZATION
The installation is done in several steps since There's drivers, the program Proteus X sound banks, the updates ... Systm is the easiest but passes without problem.
I had no compatibility problems I run under XP SP1.
Gnrale configuration and a bit complex and it is better for a walk on the documentation provided on the CD. This one is more complete but I have not had time to STUDY for all whether it is complete.
GETTING STARTED
After installation of drivers I immediately added the updates and I have no worries as well.
I am using Cubase SX but I have not done anything with him and Proteus X. Using Proteus X 4ms I go down alone (I can not follow in polyphony 2ms)
OVERALL OPINION
It's been only three days that I have but I wanted to give an opinion quickly because they are rare. Overall I think the are real but not enough trs Varis despite the amount. I think by the bank against General Midi not great. I want to return to the piano sound bank with a t dom Dj assz critical unlike what it sounds There are several piano sounds and I have not any breath. I have even found it quite good. It is somewhat difficult to compare a real piano but compared to other synthtiseur I think he is doing well trs. So I found a lment comparison with my Technics piano sound is superb for a camera in 1996.
On the report quality price EMU has done something fantastic and it is clear that I do not regret my purchase. J'espre able to find other sound banks to see what the Proteus X is still in the wind because they provided, without being bad, are incompltes, especially hip hop east.