Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Gibson Les Paul Studio (2012) reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Gibson Les Paul Studio (2012)
Images
1/1016
Gibson Les Paul Studio (2012)

LP-Shaped Guitar from Gibson belonging to the Les Paul series

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
warlus1 warlus1

«  A Gibson, but .... »

Published on 12/15/11 at 06:01
Familiar ground, we go.

The only difference is the color of the micro plating, mechanical .... gold.

By the finish against: blah blah: finger marks in the varnish, lacquer bavage between the junction sleeve body.

6 because of the finish.

UTILIZATION

Tip: the G string: many problem with this string:
play the string vacuum
put your finger between the nut and mcanique (so put your finger on the string at the head)
do a pressure and vacuum and then replay the rope ...
the rope is made dsaccorde .... a bend and it's new agreement ...

2nd problem, the E string (low): the hoop is not prcis: the middle octave and the notes are good but the soil and are not prcis! ! !

4 for the price because we know easily find better! ! !

SOUNDS

I find the sound rsolument modern, especially the bridge pickup is trs aggressive. I like it.

For solo and distortion, I found my guitar!

Now, if only to play chords / arpges plain, I do not think the Les Paul is the first choice, good for tl cons ...

9, I love

OVERALL OPINION

I know, I'm STRID but the fact of prs type guitar 1200 currently is not perfect finishing point of view, I find this unacceptable.

Now take an epiphone lp custom and a Gibson LP studio and you say ... "The gibson is when even something else!" Therefore, it has default but it outperforms even when other guitars.


I only play trs rarely so clear sound, its default does not often felt.

So I'd say it's a good guitar for 700 trs but not 1300, there are better views finish!

to get an ide of sound reproduction:
www.myspace.com/warlus2

all guitars are made with lp studio ..