View other reviews for this product:
Pi r
Published on 06/18/07 at 05:59
Value For Money :
Excellent
My Roxanne date of 1997 and was manufactured in France.
This guitar has 22 frets and is equipped with two Seymour Duncan humbuckers sh1 and sh4 (Jeff Beck), and split via the tone button (on my model, as it has evolved, I believe it). Bridge and tailpiece, Les Paul type. 2 volumes, 1 tone, 1 3-position selector.
UTILIZATION
Handle very fine and pleasant, for that kind of guitar (it's still not a Super Start '), access to acute is very easy. The ergonomics are excellent, whether sitting or carried rather low (which is my case). Lighter than a Les Paul, it's still a good piece of wood.
We get easily a good sound. My style is mostly serious split micro switch for crystal clear sound and sharp micro double-bottom, for the distorted sounds paulien.
SOUNDS
Perfect for playing rock Péchu, pop, see the very heavy. Neo metal fans will be delighted too.
Plugged into a marshall or a mesa boogie, it is a treat.
The sound of the scratching carcatéristique pulls to the Les Paul, but with a personality all its own. Hot bite at a time, a lot of power and sustain. Guitar rock! Sounds amazing with mic splitter, fenderiens or telecasteriens, with its slamming amazing.
We can therefore switch crystal clear sound and saturated dense.
Micro acute Rhythmic saturated or solo rock n roll, it has little to envy to the great.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it happily for 10 years. I love the sound of saturated micro acute and ergonomics, the look of the guitar. I have no complaints, except to depend on some conditions in which it is played: amp, sound system ...
Now I can compare it to a real Les Paul (custom shop). Lag is a little trick in less, for sure. The Les Paul dripping harmonic sounds and whatever the conditions (almost). But the lag has nothing to be ashamed of, considering the price. It has more to it a touch of originality, versatility and playability (sharpness and ergonomics of the handle). It is also less straight than a PRS, but has much more sustain, and feels more rock n roll.
An excellent price / quality ratio. With experience, it is a choice to do it again, before going to the Les Paul (by doubling the price).
Note: my guitar is 10 years old. It is said that now sounds less Lag ... It must be quite the same.
This guitar has 22 frets and is equipped with two Seymour Duncan humbuckers sh1 and sh4 (Jeff Beck), and split via the tone button (on my model, as it has evolved, I believe it). Bridge and tailpiece, Les Paul type. 2 volumes, 1 tone, 1 3-position selector.
UTILIZATION
Handle very fine and pleasant, for that kind of guitar (it's still not a Super Start '), access to acute is very easy. The ergonomics are excellent, whether sitting or carried rather low (which is my case). Lighter than a Les Paul, it's still a good piece of wood.
We get easily a good sound. My style is mostly serious split micro switch for crystal clear sound and sharp micro double-bottom, for the distorted sounds paulien.
SOUNDS
Perfect for playing rock Péchu, pop, see the very heavy. Neo metal fans will be delighted too.
Plugged into a marshall or a mesa boogie, it is a treat.
The sound of the scratching carcatéristique pulls to the Les Paul, but with a personality all its own. Hot bite at a time, a lot of power and sustain. Guitar rock! Sounds amazing with mic splitter, fenderiens or telecasteriens, with its slamming amazing.
We can therefore switch crystal clear sound and saturated dense.
Micro acute Rhythmic saturated or solo rock n roll, it has little to envy to the great.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it happily for 10 years. I love the sound of saturated micro acute and ergonomics, the look of the guitar. I have no complaints, except to depend on some conditions in which it is played: amp, sound system ...
Now I can compare it to a real Les Paul (custom shop). Lag is a little trick in less, for sure. The Les Paul dripping harmonic sounds and whatever the conditions (almost). But the lag has nothing to be ashamed of, considering the price. It has more to it a touch of originality, versatility and playability (sharpness and ergonomics of the handle). It is also less straight than a PRS, but has much more sustain, and feels more rock n roll.
An excellent price / quality ratio. With experience, it is a choice to do it again, before going to the Les Paul (by doubling the price).
Note: my guitar is 10 years old. It is said that now sounds less Lag ... It must be quite the same.