What is the difference between contemporary music and free jazz ?
- 25 replies
- 12 participants
- 24,712 views
- 13 followers

Anonymous
0

Topic Posted on 01/27/2008 at 14:42:17What is the difference between contemporary music and free jazz ?
So what ? 

- 1
- 2

Anonymous
0

2 Posted on 01/27/2008 at 16:00:33
It reminds me of this :
"Once, it's a mistake. Twice, it's Jazz."
"Once, it's a mistake. Twice, it's Jazz."
0

Alosely_en
9

New AFfiliate
Member 17 years ago
3 Posted on 01/29/2008 at 09:10:29
Hum...
It's totally different : contemporary music is playing noise with musical instruments. Free jazz, is playing noise with musical instruments... But it's jazz
(This is a flag)
It's totally different : contemporary music is playing noise with musical instruments. Free jazz, is playing noise with musical instruments... But it's jazz

(This is a flag)
0
MySpace | "Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love" A. Einstein

liverpool
15

New AFfiliate
Member 17 years ago
4 Posted on 01/29/2008 at 15:28:35
Intellectual topics by Kloug... I love them ! 

0
The story of life is quicker than the wink of an eye/The story of Love is just hello and goodbye/Until we meet again (Jimi Hendrix)

kon-tiki
843

AFfectionate Poster
Member 19 years ago
5 Posted on 01/30/2008 at 02:12:13
Improvisation!
0

Anonymous
0

6 Posted on 01/30/2008 at 16:40:01
Not always.
Epitaph (by Mingus) was a jazz song wrote for orchestra.
http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=S86WzxIbolw

http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=S86WzxIbolw
0

Anonymous

7 Posted on 01/31/2008 at 00:56:08
The style
The name
etc...
There's a lot of things you'll never make in jazz, and its free from any other styles, so you can call it contemporary music.

The name

etc...

There's a lot of things you'll never make in jazz, and its free from any other styles, so you can call it contemporary music.

0

MrKermit
26

New AFfiliate
Member 21 years ago
8 Posted on 01/31/2008 at 01:19:24
If it's ugly and boring, it's contemporary music.
If it's just boring, it's jazz
If it's just boring, it's jazz
0

Alosely_en
9

New AFfiliate
Member 17 years ago
9 Posted on 01/31/2008 at 02:04:45

kon-tiki
843

AFfectionate Poster
Member 19 years ago
10 Posted on 01/31/2008 at 05:43:58
If it doesn't have improvisation then it isn't jazz in my book. it's just contemporary classicial music, or comtemporary whatever. jazz needs improvisation.
0

MrKermit
26

New AFfiliate
Member 21 years ago
11 Posted on 01/31/2008 at 06:35:56
And boringness 

0

kon-tiki
843

AFfectionate Poster
Member 19 years ago
12 Posted on 01/31/2008 at 07:24:10
Boring because you've mastered it or because you don't understand it? or maybe it just doesn't speak to you... but boring is a subjective notion in all cases.
0

MrKermit
26

New AFfiliate
Member 21 years ago
13 Posted on 01/31/2008 at 07:47:59
I know, I just like trolling
But being serious 2 minutes, I really have a problem with jazz. I know I should like it but it just bores me to death (except fot new orlean and manouche swing, and a few exceptions). I don't know why, maybe it relies to much on technic and not enough on emotion in my opinion
But I totally understand and respect jazz addicts, it's just not for me

But being serious 2 minutes, I really have a problem with jazz. I know I should like it but it just bores me to death (except fot new orlean and manouche swing, and a few exceptions). I don't know why, maybe it relies to much on technic and not enough on emotion in my opinion
But I totally understand and respect jazz addicts, it's just not for me
0

kon-tiki
843

AFfectionate Poster
Member 19 years ago
14 Posted on 01/31/2008 at 08:49:47
I can understand that. try listening to the "kind of blue" album by miles davis. it's more of a mood album and less of a technical album, even though there's still a lot of chops in there. but if you still don't like it after chilling out and listening to it a few times, then jazz really isn't for you. http://img.af-v4.com/images/audiofanzine/interface/smileys/icon_cry.gif(" />(" />
0

MrKermit
26

New AFfiliate
Member 21 years ago
15 Posted on 01/31/2008 at 08:56:12
Yeah, I listened a lot of Miles Davis because he is one of the exceptions I was talking about
But still, when I want to listen music I rarelly pick a Miles Davis CD. Maybe I'm allergic.

But still, when I want to listen music I rarelly pick a Miles Davis CD. Maybe I'm allergic.
0

Dr Pouet
4

New AFfiliate
Member 21 years ago
16 Posted on 01/31/2008 at 17:40:38
Quote: new orlean and manouche swing
How boring !

There are so many types of jazz that it's impossible (I think) to like everyone.
But :
Quote: I should like it
Why should you ?
By the way : new orleans and manouche are amongst the most technical ones (let's add Be Bop) so your remark is a bit ironic.
I don't know well the kind of music you use to listen to (as mentioned in your french profile), but I see Radiohead -> try John Zorn ?
Amon tobin -> try "Time 4 change" or "Organics" by Laurent de Wilde, or "Gambit" by Julien Lourau
Or anything from Medeski Martin & Wood...
Hope you''l like some of them !

0

MrKermit
26

New AFfiliate
Member 21 years ago
17 Posted on 02/01/2008 at 00:32:57
Yeah, I know manouche and new orlean are very technical, but it seems to me that it is more "living", there's something I feel in that I don't feel in bebop for example.
I know John Zorn and Julien Loureau, and I really like them, but as I said, when I want to listen something, I very rarelly listen to them.
And when I say I should like Jazz, it's more that I'd like to like jazz. When I see the amount of stuff I could discover and love, it just seems endless, but it just doesn't speak to me...
I know John Zorn and Julien Loureau, and I really like them, but as I said, when I want to listen something, I very rarelly listen to them.
And when I say I should like Jazz, it's more that I'd like to like jazz. When I see the amount of stuff I could discover and love, it just seems endless, but it just doesn't speak to me...
0

Dr Pouet
4

New AFfiliate
Member 21 years ago
18 Posted on 02/03/2008 at 10:35:38
Quote: When I see the amount of stuff I could discover and love, it just seems endless
That's right !
Quote: I know manouche and new orlean are very technical, but it seems to me that it is more "living", there's something I feel in that I don't feel in bebop for example.
It makes me think of a friend who desperatly try to make me love be-bop !

For these styles (manouche, New-Orleans, Bebop...), I'm like you : I rarely chose them for listening.
I think that the trick is to find something that you really like (= decide to listen to frequently) ; and then discover other disks whose style is similar. So the goal (and th difficulty !) is to find the golden vein !
You should try things close to what you already like. Some other suggestions :
Amon Tobin -> General Electrics, US3 (hand on the torch, well not really jazz, but a bunch of samples from Blue Note), Herbie Hancock (Future2future, head hunters...)
Bebop rock : Happy Apple
Strange and funny bebop : Les Double six
Very different, real jazz, subtle : "Colonel Skopj" from Henry Texier, or "Remparts d'argile" which is beautiful.
Destructured, rock, free, strange : "En attendant Marcel" or "Dentiste" from Laurent Dehors
Close to New Orleans : "Joe Cool's blues" from Wynton Marsalis & family
Almost funk : "In Crowd Anthology" by Ramsey lewis, "Live in Europe" by Bill Evans
Close to world Music : Hadouk Trio, "Blue Camel" from Rabuh Abou Khalil
Beautiful voice, lot of emotion, somewhat New orleans "Live in New Morning" from Dianne Reeves
Hope this helps !

Listen to some samples on Amzaon, and select the one which strikes you...
0

MrKermit
26

New AFfiliate
Member 21 years ago
19 Posted on 02/04/2008 at 00:19:25
Thanks 

0

Dr Pouet
4

New AFfiliate
Member 21 years ago
20 Posted on 02/04/2008 at 11:56:36
You're welcome !
Ha, and have a listening to Thelonious Monk ( "brilliant corners" for instance). Lots of people "shouldn't like him" (for instance they like only english punk / noisy pop), but happen to love it. Hard to explain, except tht he brought new possibilities in harmony, like Ravel or Bartok.

Ha, and have a listening to Thelonious Monk ( "brilliant corners" for instance). Lots of people "shouldn't like him" (for instance they like only english punk / noisy pop), but happen to love it. Hard to explain, except tht he brought new possibilities in harmony, like Ravel or Bartok.

0

MrKermit
26

New AFfiliate
Member 21 years ago
21 Posted on 02/05/2008 at 03:46:11
Yeah, I love Monk
When I listen to him, I feel like he didn't have any choice but to play exactly that music. No calculation, nothing artificial, only him playing what he knows he has to play. May sound silly but that's what I most like about his music, there's a real person behind it...And that's a thing I don't feel about bebop for example
Quote: Hard to explain, except tht he brought new possibilities in harmony, like Ravel or Bartok.
When I listen to him, I feel like he didn't have any choice but to play exactly that music. No calculation, nothing artificial, only him playing what he knows he has to play. May sound silly but that's what I most like about his music, there's a real person behind it...And that's a thing I don't feel about bebop for example
0

Inusable™
2

New AFfiliate
Member 22 years ago
22 Posted on 03/03/2008 at 13:49:49
There is a word that can make the link between the french version of AF and this thread :
cliché
That's just what I can see here...
cliché
That's just what I can see here...
0

MrKermit
26

New AFfiliate
Member 21 years ago
23 Posted on 03/04/2008 at 00:41:39
If it's a post from kloug, it's a call for cliché
AF rule n°127
AF rule n°127
0

Head Minerve
4

New AFfiliate
Member 19 years ago
24 Posted on 12/30/2008 at 09:39:49
If I take Reich's link a few posts before, I can hear typical Reich : contemporan architecture with very classical harmony, right ?
Reich is easy listening to me, like Django is in what we strangely call "jazz" (obvious because of improvisation in it, but far from the other main styles).
Because 90% gipsy guitar is common harmonies and cadences (word in english ?), it could be sold next to pop music in our fnacs. See Sanseverino...
Contemporan music may be very close to classical composition to me, even though there's no melodic instrument in the piece of music. But jazz consantly try to break the rules, no ? (contemporan guys do the same, dammit)
But rules (and limits) are something we have if we close our mind to other uncommon rules. Like Kermit, I have trouble with some kinds of music, but that's not especially jazz, I'd rather say music that never follow a common rule we can find in mainstream music.
When I have trouble with that kind of music (Miles Davis is an example), I try to listen it as an experience, not like a commonly built piece of music. If I try, I won't get the point and appreciate the shit.
It's the same with contemporan, if I don't understand it, I try to listen it as if it wasn't music, but a listenable phenomen... Sorry I'm OT !
And actually I find common points instead of differences... Muhaha. But I wasn't the first to talk about boring shit, that IS off-topic.
Reich is easy listening to me, like Django is in what we strangely call "jazz" (obvious because of improvisation in it, but far from the other main styles).
Because 90% gipsy guitar is common harmonies and cadences (word in english ?), it could be sold next to pop music in our fnacs. See Sanseverino...
Contemporan music may be very close to classical composition to me, even though there's no melodic instrument in the piece of music. But jazz consantly try to break the rules, no ? (contemporan guys do the same, dammit)
But rules (and limits) are something we have if we close our mind to other uncommon rules. Like Kermit, I have trouble with some kinds of music, but that's not especially jazz, I'd rather say music that never follow a common rule we can find in mainstream music.
When I have trouble with that kind of music (Miles Davis is an example), I try to listen it as an experience, not like a commonly built piece of music. If I try, I won't get the point and appreciate the shit.
It's the same with contemporan, if I don't understand it, I try to listen it as if it wasn't music, but a listenable phenomen... Sorry I'm OT !

And actually I find common points instead of differences... Muhaha. But I wasn't the first to talk about boring shit, that IS off-topic.

0

Richard22
1

New AFfiliate
Member 15 years ago
25 Posted on 06/01/2010 at 04:37:40
Hi I'm Richard!
New to this forum, I'm nuts about music!
Looking forward to sharing some tips with you guys

0
- < Thread list
- Rules
- 1
- 2