Become a member
Become a member
Continuer avec Google

or
Log in
Log in
Se connecter avec Google

or

Thread In-ear monitors... the down side....?

Light mode
  • 3 replies
  • 2 participants
  • 1,014 views
  • 2 followers
claytonian@sbcglobal.net

claytonian@sbcglobal.net

11 posts
New AFfiliate
Premier post
1 Posted on 04/19/2016 at 10:14:03
I'm watching "The Voice" which I think is the best-of-breed on the i-box right now... I hear allot of pitchy vocals and I'm thinking it might be due to the ( now ) nearly universal use of in-ear monitors...?

In the studio, I'll often recommend a singer leave at least one side of their headphones off so they can hear an uncompromised open acoustic version in addition to the feed into their ear canal ( along with the consequent resonances caused by their own unique physiology )... Most of the time with in-ear, I hear people no quite getting there when shooting for the high notes, in other words... they're singing flat.

Has anyone experienced a similar effect and do you know of any studies which might illuminate this question..?
Mike Levine

Mike Levine

1064 posts
AFicionado
2 Posted on 04/20/2016 at 07:42:23
Quote:
Has anyone experienced a similar effect and do you know of any studies which might illuminate this question..?

I haven't heard of any studies like that, but it's an interesting question. Even if what you postulate is true, the question still remains, do the benefits of in-ear monitors (quieter stage sound, less ear damage, better customization of mixes, better sound out front due to lack of monitor wedge bleed, hearing oneself louder), override the potential pitch issue? I would vote yes on that. Still, while I'm sure you're right in some cases, I think in-ears are beneficial, in most cases, from a pitch standpoint. If they caused pitchiness, why would so many major touring artists use them? After all, wedges are easier from a setup standpoint (no worries about fickle wireless frequencies), and cheaper than in-ear systems overall. My assumption is that the reason the switch has been made to in-ears is that they simply work better and provide more control than wedge-based systems.
claytonian@sbcglobal.net

claytonian@sbcglobal.net

11 posts
New AFfiliate
3 Posted on 04/21/2016 at 10:57:59
Thanks for your perspective... Those who have made the switch are certain to endorse their choice ( simple human confirmation bias ), and especially because it is new and sexy, but I'll be interested to watch over time to see if the real benefits ( and they are substantial ) do indeed override the need for a perfectly-pitched vocal...

Interestingly, you bring up another phenomenon which is the apparent lack of concern ( in some new artist's ) for a well tuned vocal... I first began hearing some of the top vocalists singing tuneless melodies about 15 years ago, and it seems to have become "a thing" in some circles... I'm a dino and things do change, so-it-goes...and I'm now remembering Bob Dylan...Hum mm...???
claytonian@sbcglobal.net

claytonian@sbcglobal.net

11 posts
New AFfiliate
4 Posted on 12/10/2020 at 11:20:25
Now, more than ever, I'm convinced in-ear monitors are degrading performance... Again, currently on "The Voice", most of the contestants who make it thru the trials have great pitch... But they are all singing out of tune, and I'm certain if they'd just leave one ear open to natural sound, and by virtue of the transmission of their voices thru their jaw-bones, they'll be better off... :P:
cookies

We are using cookies!

Yes, Audiofanzine is using cookies. Since the last thing that we want is disturbing your diet with too much fat or too much sugar, you'll be glad to learn that we made them ourselves with fresh, organic and fair ingredients, and with a perfect nutritional balance. What this means is that the data we store in them is used to enhance your use of our website as well as improve your user experience on our pages (learn more). To configure your cookie preferences, click here.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies

Cookies not subject to consent

These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine and allow its optimization. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.

Website preferences

We store your preferences so that you do not have to re-enter them every time your come back (forums options, dark or light theme, classifieds filter, standard or buzz news, newsletters popups...).

Log in

This one makes sure you don't have to re-enter your credentials every time you visit Audiofanzine.

Analytics

This data allows us to understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it.

Advertising

This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :)

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies

Cookies not subject to consent

These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine and allow its optimization. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.

Website preferences

We store your preferences so that you do not have to re-enter them every time your come back (forums options, dark or light theme, classifieds filter, standard or buzz news, newsletters popups...).

Log in

This one makes sure you don't have to re-enter your credentials every time you visit Audiofanzine.

Analytics

This data allows us to understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it.

Advertising

This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :)


You can find more details on data protection in our privacy policy.