View other reviews for this product:
SlapKid
Published on 07/07/07 at 13:33
What a conversation pieces ... Make no illusions, it's not as killer machine.
Goodies: tlcommande taking the bypass transparent and silent, the noise almost absent, the contour control.
Cons: the main transformer SPECIFICATIONS, lack of controls for each mode spars, and especially of yapa equalizer. Also, the ACCS lamp is so ch ... they dare not. This is especially bad as simply changing the lamp can do so many things.
Finally, the price is overdone given the lack of the machine. The tubeman is just more expensive and so much more usable.
UTILIZATION
Rgler the trick is frustrating, a gain for two modes is very wrong. Be the crunch sound is louder than the lead or the lead is stronger but the crunch is almost clean. Duty. CHARACTERISTICS of course desirable for the legalization of lead have not seen those desirable for the crunch you get the picture ...
Dceptions in chain, and the price dbours the whole empire.
2 volumes, 2 contours, 2 drives, and global eq is what it would actually.
Or it is used as a simple pedals sound but the same was wrong, the sound is always too full in the bass, not the best and more.
I put zero, pan
SOUND QUALITY
Positivons now ... The tube factor produces clean sounds great, by the way Frank Nimsgern Himself uses it as a direct box of luxury for its acoustic sets. It is the only aspect missing or does not arise.
The gain lead tone and contour trs corner is fun, with double hearing. Trs player in this case the tube factor.
I could not have ar crunch blame the lack of true equalizer, still too fat, seriously hard.
On a bassman has not sound too stiff Pabo. Such a deluxe reverb. Amp transistors on worse.
With a vox class A, class A is a boogie that the ESG the excess fat the least. Class seems to round the corners of the tube trs spicy factor. But hey it's still not great, I know not what they think the lamp as a hideout, with another on a would sound better.
So I found a compromise bypass-crunch-lead on my Class A amps, so I can finally use the pedals.
I also put my APRS compressor when I take the electro acoustic sound amlioration trs net in this case, and the simplicity works wonders.
OVERALL OPINION
99-2000 for the very first, without a change against the original amp, trs good deal for me ...
Then I bought the current version of a buddy ultra dcu by the gear. Sounds like that the era.
The classic amp is not much better, more natural and everything. Hardness level of the tube is at the same level as the Tech21 GT2. In fact, this all sounds dernire allows the factor and much more, I know since I use both. But I think the best choice is the tri-tech ac 21, softer and ultra flexible, and consolidated 3CH ridiculous (more than one hundred hours with 9volts energizer, mind-blowing!
Finally you're INFORMS. The brainwashing is not good for the wallet eh
Goodies: tlcommande taking the bypass transparent and silent, the noise almost absent, the contour control.
Cons: the main transformer SPECIFICATIONS, lack of controls for each mode spars, and especially of yapa equalizer. Also, the ACCS lamp is so ch ... they dare not. This is especially bad as simply changing the lamp can do so many things.
Finally, the price is overdone given the lack of the machine. The tubeman is just more expensive and so much more usable.
UTILIZATION
Rgler the trick is frustrating, a gain for two modes is very wrong. Be the crunch sound is louder than the lead or the lead is stronger but the crunch is almost clean. Duty. CHARACTERISTICS of course desirable for the legalization of lead have not seen those desirable for the crunch you get the picture ...
Dceptions in chain, and the price dbours the whole empire.
2 volumes, 2 contours, 2 drives, and global eq is what it would actually.
Or it is used as a simple pedals sound but the same was wrong, the sound is always too full in the bass, not the best and more.
I put zero, pan
SOUND QUALITY
Positivons now ... The tube factor produces clean sounds great, by the way Frank Nimsgern Himself uses it as a direct box of luxury for its acoustic sets. It is the only aspect missing or does not arise.
The gain lead tone and contour trs corner is fun, with double hearing. Trs player in this case the tube factor.
I could not have ar crunch blame the lack of true equalizer, still too fat, seriously hard.
On a bassman has not sound too stiff Pabo. Such a deluxe reverb. Amp transistors on worse.
With a vox class A, class A is a boogie that the ESG the excess fat the least. Class seems to round the corners of the tube trs spicy factor. But hey it's still not great, I know not what they think the lamp as a hideout, with another on a would sound better.
So I found a compromise bypass-crunch-lead on my Class A amps, so I can finally use the pedals.
I also put my APRS compressor when I take the electro acoustic sound amlioration trs net in this case, and the simplicity works wonders.
OVERALL OPINION
99-2000 for the very first, without a change against the original amp, trs good deal for me ...
Then I bought the current version of a buddy ultra dcu by the gear. Sounds like that the era.
The classic amp is not much better, more natural and everything. Hardness level of the tube is at the same level as the Tech21 GT2. In fact, this all sounds dernire allows the factor and much more, I know since I use both. But I think the best choice is the tri-tech ac 21, softer and ultra flexible, and consolidated 3CH ridiculous (more than one hundred hours with 9volts energizer, mind-blowing!
Finally you're INFORMS. The brainwashing is not good for the wallet eh