View other reviews for this product:
zako
Published on 12/09/05 at 06:41
I board in use for nine years a fleet of 12 112 for Mtd home of dance, theater and acoustic music - trad jazz - in a national stage. It was very difficult to find fault, whether in front or back use. I love color, the return of the diabolical coherence and spectral transition brings the coaxial system - to bring the Tannoy. I board not had the opportunity to try the big sister Mtd 115, and so I can try to compare. However, I board did a lot of shelf rock back as manager and I know the Martin LE-400 and Nexo PS-15 which tend to replace them in recent years. I personally do not like the bowls but I think I understand the reason for their use and comparison with recurrent BAT 112 can be interesting. It seems that when an engineer taking on the design of an economic forum, he have to choose between performance or focus improve spectral accuracy. I think this is the difference between the most and the PS15 Mtd112.
The Nexo has the "ball" but it is very hard, even aggressive in the upper-medium and its response curve is on the edge of fantasy - I board tried one day where I had broadcast front-sic - of analyze and correct: the result was unusable, Eq my graph 'like a mountain course Russian. However the pressure delivered and directivity asymmetrical tightly controlled effectively allows to work at home on a rock plateau that often reaches 100 dBA, as in this case the mix must be returned utility to avoid escalation decibel and where we should concentrate on giving each zicos just what he needs.
L-Acoustic is very thin and strong respectuese signal that is sent. on the other hand, it has not the "ball" and its directivity 90 ° makes it "dicey" in a rock'n roll with a lot of microphones in return mix. However, it will do wonders in an acoustic which allows high accuracy at low volume work and respect the habit of listening to each other musicians on traditional instruments, non-amplified. I board had virtually no criticism in this specific context, while I was doing the mix often return from the front. Yes it may seem a little expensive when you consider the price of a pair of the amp and processor. The latter is expensive and absolutely necessary: Not only it has a "sense" of return and protection of the couple amp / speaker but the linear aspect of the response curve seemed vested: BAT 112 without the process 'is no longer a Mtd! on the other hand, it's a choice of first order in time because the build quality is the quasi-military sweep all concurrent endurance and reliability issue over time. At about 1000 Euros unity, this gives vraimment thinking - Argus Sonomag.
I would like the opportunity to test the 115fm appears to have characteristics more suited to the constraints of amplified music back in use. But this is not the same price, and should then be compared with models more active high-end home Adamson, Meyer, D & B or Apogee. Models rare in our country but well known across the Rhine and Belgium, where equipment budgets are not the same as here. QED!
The Nexo has the "ball" but it is very hard, even aggressive in the upper-medium and its response curve is on the edge of fantasy - I board tried one day where I had broadcast front-sic - of analyze and correct: the result was unusable, Eq my graph 'like a mountain course Russian. However the pressure delivered and directivity asymmetrical tightly controlled effectively allows to work at home on a rock plateau that often reaches 100 dBA, as in this case the mix must be returned utility to avoid escalation decibel and where we should concentrate on giving each zicos just what he needs.
L-Acoustic is very thin and strong respectuese signal that is sent. on the other hand, it has not the "ball" and its directivity 90 ° makes it "dicey" in a rock'n roll with a lot of microphones in return mix. However, it will do wonders in an acoustic which allows high accuracy at low volume work and respect the habit of listening to each other musicians on traditional instruments, non-amplified. I board had virtually no criticism in this specific context, while I was doing the mix often return from the front. Yes it may seem a little expensive when you consider the price of a pair of the amp and processor. The latter is expensive and absolutely necessary: Not only it has a "sense" of return and protection of the couple amp / speaker but the linear aspect of the response curve seemed vested: BAT 112 without the process 'is no longer a Mtd! on the other hand, it's a choice of first order in time because the build quality is the quasi-military sweep all concurrent endurance and reliability issue over time. At about 1000 Euros unity, this gives vraimment thinking - Argus Sonomag.
I would like the opportunity to test the 115fm appears to have characteristics more suited to the constraints of amplified music back in use. But this is not the same price, and should then be compared with models more active high-end home Adamson, Meyer, D & B or Apogee. Models rare in our country but well known across the Rhine and Belgium, where equipment budgets are not the same as here. QED!