View other reviews for this product:
nico2000
Published on 03/10/05 at 15:16
The HK Audio LUCAS 1000 is an excellent product. Be careful because there are large diffrence in quality between the products in the LUCAS.
Indeed, the LUCAS XT 600 and are much cheaper (almost half price) but they are teams of piezo-electric tweeters, a small 12-inch woofer and medium HP but no more correct, with no amplification bad, but a little soft and harmonic distortion visible in the mediums. While the acute shortage of some energy. However, they are much cheaper that the system Mac Mah Triflex competitor, which also does not possde-limiting features of the processor that small Systmes intgrent dj.
With the LUCAS 1000, everything changes. Double the price, but is ay, there was real compression tweeters (Eminence APT-150), the 15-inch subwoofer is out of proportion, and amplification, which does not contain the same components, is clearly more dynamic. The sound is much thinner, clear, with much deeper bass. In fact from 1000 is changed carrment class of product.
Only downside: the finish is fragile ... plutt
LUCAS 1000 is therefore, in my opinion, every penny, even if one has reconnatre the quality of Mackie SRM-450, or Systmes behringer, when same are excellent products, APRS trying LUCAS 1000, I decided, for reasons of personal sensitivity, to adopt it.
Indeed, the LUCAS XT 600 and are much cheaper (almost half price) but they are teams of piezo-electric tweeters, a small 12-inch woofer and medium HP but no more correct, with no amplification bad, but a little soft and harmonic distortion visible in the mediums. While the acute shortage of some energy. However, they are much cheaper that the system Mac Mah Triflex competitor, which also does not possde-limiting features of the processor that small Systmes intgrent dj.
With the LUCAS 1000, everything changes. Double the price, but is ay, there was real compression tweeters (Eminence APT-150), the 15-inch subwoofer is out of proportion, and amplification, which does not contain the same components, is clearly more dynamic. The sound is much thinner, clear, with much deeper bass. In fact from 1000 is changed carrment class of product.
Only downside: the finish is fragile ... plutt
LUCAS 1000 is therefore, in my opinion, every penny, even if one has reconnatre the quality of Mackie SRM-450, or Systmes behringer, when same are excellent products, APRS trying LUCAS 1000, I decided, for reasons of personal sensitivity, to adopt it.