Log in
Log in

or

Thread Pro Tools vs. Cubase/Cakewalk etc.

  • 4 replies
  • 5 participants
  • 3,280 views
  • 0 follower
Chardo

Chardo

21 posts
New AFfiliate
First post
1 Posted on 10/17/2004 at 22:39:50
Hey folks,
Just working on figuring out my studio setup. Does anyone have any advice or recommendations as to using Pro Tools or Cubase/Cakewalk etc.? I have heard that while Pro Tools is industry standard for a lot of things, it isn't the best when you start integrating MIDI into the setup. I figure I will be doing mostly MIDI, although some audio recording/editing will also be done. So I was wondering if rather than going for the M-Box should I go for another audio interface (such as the Edirol U8-25 or something) and Cubase? Anyone with experience or advice from both sides would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks
Chardo
manowar

manowar

161 posts
AFfinity Poster
2 Posted on 10/18/2004 at 05:04:51
I'm using Cubase for recording and for midi editing. I have halion 2.0 vst for halion files, giga sampler vst for gig files and reason rewired with cubase.
toks

toks

1 post
New AFfiliate
3 Posted on 09/17/2006 at 15:52:23
Dear Chardo,

I have been using cakwalk for a while now and find it very friendly and comfortable to use. I have become proficient in using it and would recommend it to you or anyone for that matter. Having said this I would say that most of these sequencers basically function in almost the same way since they are designed to accomplish specific tasks. I think you should use that program that u are most comfortable with and proficient in.

A lot has been said about protools as being the industry standard at this point in time and I must say that also at some points in time cubase and cakewalk were considered industry standards, so I will still ask you to go with whichever sequencer you are most comfartable with and proficient in as the term "Industry standard" is a pretty dynamics one and depends a lot on the research and new developments undertaken by the varoius software manufacturers.

As for the soundcard issue, I use a terratec EWS88MT and it has been pretty reliable so Iwill advice that any high end soundcard from a reputable manufacturer will do, the issue is likely to be your budget.

Anyway I hope that you make the right choice for you and will like to know what you resolved to do and how you progress from there.


Toks
DoA

DoA

42 posts
New AFfiliate
4 Posted on 04/16/2007 at 07:41:11
pro tools requires the hardware to function, so purely from a cost POV I would go with pro tools. I have worked / work with both and I can honestly say that there is nothing that can be done in pro tools which can't in cubase.

At home I am still using cubase LE - I have no need to increase to SX. My point of view is that you should stick with one piece of kit and get used to it. Its not always about having the latest / best stuff. Try and work with both and see which you prefer!

DoA
orsup

orsup

2 posts
New AFfiliate
5 Posted on 09/19/2007 at 12:32:57
Without question I will recomend Cubase SX. It will incorporate all of your MIDI work seemlesly. I have worked with all of the gear you mentioned and Cubase by far is more reliable and Pro.


Good Luck
cookies
We are using cookies!

Yes, Audiofanzine is using cookies. Since the last thing that we want is disturbing your diet with too much fat or too much sugar, you'll be glad to learn that we made them ourselves with fresh, organic and fair ingredients, and with a perfect nutritional balance. What this means is that the data we store in them is used to enhance your use of our website as well as improve your user experience on our pages and show you personalised ads (learn more). To configure your cookie preferences, click here.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent
These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine and allow its optimization. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Example: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).
Google Analytics
We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it.
Advertising
This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest. We are likely to display advertisements from our own platform, from Google Advertising Products or from Adform.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent

These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Examples: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).

Google Analytics

We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it. When this parameter is activated, no personal information is sent to Google and the IP addresses are anonymized.

Advertising

This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest. We are likely to display advertisements from our own platform, from Google Advertising Products or from Adform.


You can find more details on data protection in our privacy policy.
You can also find information about how Google uses personal data by following this link.