View other reviews for this product:
zograme
Published on 07/05/08 at 20:00
The award does THE FIRST motivation. Thomann 500 shipping included for a system that 2.1, is theft ... But in a good way ^ ^
I was looking for a system that flat (as usual), which does not bleed in the lower mdiums like so many others, that is truly Fidler in restitution and that allows me to find my mix across .
I work at home in my room, dim = 4 * 3 * 3m (hot, hot trs).
The placement of the sub is quite dlicat couraging, as always in the end, but it is well worth the effort. To get the best, I urge you to avoid the traditional home studio configs, ie against the wall. Conversely, if you can, you put 2-3 meters of the wall, with the sub in the face, pressed against the wall.
Note that Bluesky provides a lot of doc on its website to help with good positioning of the gear.
SOUNDS
The curve frequency drives ad is always idyllic my mind on paper. APRS, say it is Systm ultra flat, I would be quite incapable, as the acoustics at home is terrible. However, I really want to say that yes, the Medidesk is one of the flat I've had the opportunity to test. First thanks the absence of bass reflex. The coupling box satellite is underway. No abusive frequency drives, particularly down mdiums pushed back to me in many MODELS.
Stereo image is large trs, trs prcise. I could fault this Systm not have enough momentum. In my case, I verifies the CRITERIA on my headphone (a SONY MDR 7506). Some dtails tend not to be put forward enough, but I'm not that much of PRTSR my sound (2.5 sec in the 2-frisette 3kz, hell ).
OVERALL OPINION
I have this Systm since late January.
I prfre is its ability to reproduce the spectral balance of my mix. I found the same thing (apart from each Systm inhrentes colors, of course) everywhere, and that's exactly what I wanted, especially for a price as drisoire. It is very practical to enhance the timbre of different instruments, and make a mix that will enhance your components. To the real mix, I would advise however plutt throw an ear on his great ERRF the Prodesk (APRS costs far sr ^ ^).
The dynamic range is less tense than on other Systmes (OBS Far instance, or BM 6A), but it is quite difficult I think to work effectively on this CRITERIA without at least two costs Different.
I test a lot of stuff before buying, ie, Fostex PM1, the Genelec 1029, FAR OBS, the ADAM (I remember the MODEL c'tait but the input e-end), the Alesis, and still others a few years. I do not regret my choice. We must lend an ear to make a good mix, but trs honntement, they are of a report-quality unbeatable price. For that price, it seems to me difficult to get better.
Update of 06/07/08: This is actually Systm trs reliable, insofar as I find the balance and color of the mix on all points Coutes tested. However, they sound trs neutral and s'quiper of a system that will parallle hifi in the icing on the gteau.
I was looking for a system that flat (as usual), which does not bleed in the lower mdiums like so many others, that is truly Fidler in restitution and that allows me to find my mix across .
I work at home in my room, dim = 4 * 3 * 3m (hot, hot trs).
The placement of the sub is quite dlicat couraging, as always in the end, but it is well worth the effort. To get the best, I urge you to avoid the traditional home studio configs, ie against the wall. Conversely, if you can, you put 2-3 meters of the wall, with the sub in the face, pressed against the wall.
Note that Bluesky provides a lot of doc on its website to help with good positioning of the gear.
SOUNDS
The curve frequency drives ad is always idyllic my mind on paper. APRS, say it is Systm ultra flat, I would be quite incapable, as the acoustics at home is terrible. However, I really want to say that yes, the Medidesk is one of the flat I've had the opportunity to test. First thanks the absence of bass reflex. The coupling box satellite is underway. No abusive frequency drives, particularly down mdiums pushed back to me in many MODELS.
Stereo image is large trs, trs prcise. I could fault this Systm not have enough momentum. In my case, I verifies the CRITERIA on my headphone (a SONY MDR 7506). Some dtails tend not to be put forward enough, but I'm not that much of PRTSR my sound (2.5 sec in the 2-frisette 3kz, hell ).
OVERALL OPINION
I have this Systm since late January.
I prfre is its ability to reproduce the spectral balance of my mix. I found the same thing (apart from each Systm inhrentes colors, of course) everywhere, and that's exactly what I wanted, especially for a price as drisoire. It is very practical to enhance the timbre of different instruments, and make a mix that will enhance your components. To the real mix, I would advise however plutt throw an ear on his great ERRF the Prodesk (APRS costs far sr ^ ^).
The dynamic range is less tense than on other Systmes (OBS Far instance, or BM 6A), but it is quite difficult I think to work effectively on this CRITERIA without at least two costs Different.
I test a lot of stuff before buying, ie, Fostex PM1, the Genelec 1029, FAR OBS, the ADAM (I remember the MODEL c'tait but the input e-end), the Alesis, and still others a few years. I do not regret my choice. We must lend an ear to make a good mix, but trs honntement, they are of a report-quality unbeatable price. For that price, it seems to me difficult to get better.
Update of 06/07/08: This is actually Systm trs reliable, insofar as I find the balance and color of the mix on all points Coutes tested. However, they sound trs neutral and s'quiper of a system that will parallle hifi in the icing on the gteau.