Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Marshall 2210 JCM800 Split Channel Reverb [1982-1989] reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Marshall 2210 JCM800 Split Channel Reverb [1982-1989]
Images
1/774
Marshall 2210 JCM800 Split Channel Reverb [1982-1989]

Tube Guitar Amp Head from Marshall belonging to the JCM800 series

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
MGR/Eric MGR/Eric

« Marshall JCM 800 2210 Series »

Published on 01/03/02 at 15:00
Bought used from a private party in NYC with a Carvin 4X12 cabinet for $650. He obviously had no idea what he had. His loss. This is the 100-watt 2-channel lead head.

This amp is a 2210 series JCM-800 circa 1988. HUGE Marshall sound. LOUD doesn't begin to describe this amp. Try ear-splitting, deafening, I could go on.

Seriously, I can't put the volume past 2 in a medium-sized practice room because it completely buries the drums....and we have a hard-hitting drummer. It's that good.

Versatile, 2-channel with a footswitch. Clean, it's warm as can be. Distorted, it will rip your head clean off. I play a variety of guitars (Fender custom shop Strat, Les Paul, and Hamer Explorer) through this amp and they all sound great. I use a small-clone chorus pedal and that's all you need.

Nothing. It's the be-all end all. Period.
Nothing even comes close. I've tried the new Marshalls (puke), Randalls, Crate, etc. and they're all pretenders.

It's an old amp and it's been kicked around a lot. I have to have it re-tubed every 6 months or so, but that's the story with tube amps. It's held its own like a champ. It weighs about a ton.

Don't waste your money on the new Marshalls. They suck. Get one of these today...seriously...they truly don't make 'em like this anymore.

The only amp that even comes close is a Mesa Boogie triple-rectifier and hey if you've got $1500 to drop on one of those more power to ya.

I like the JCM 800 better and you can get them cheap since they're older and most people don't know what they have when they have one.

This review was originally published on http://www.musicgearreview.com