Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
EN
FR
Marshall 4500 JCM900 Dual Reverb [1990-1999]
(7)
Write a user review
Where to buy 4500 JCM900 Dual Reverb [1990-1999]?
Less
No retailers are offering this product at this time.
Availability alert
There are no classified ads for this product.
New ad alert
View all user reviews
Higher Gain Higher Gain
Published on 06/23/09 at 01:14
Head lamps 50w amp switchable to 25w which is very practical for playing in a small room, a room for example.
this amp has only two channels: a light that goes to a crunch with the gain, a distortion, and then there's a little reverb.

UTILIZATION

The configuration is super simple, with a single against qualisation for 2 channels.
we get the sound very easy there is no sound 36.

SOUNDS

So I play especially rock, metal. This receiver is suitable for rock but not mtal
I used a gibson sg standard, it was rock and roll sound good draft, not even one arrives at ACDC, too dgueu.
used with a marshall 1960a, the whole is more than baveu, the slurry is sound, it's really ingrable.
it is only exploitable clean and crunch, and as I am not fan of crunch ..
the knobs have little effect on the sound.
Finally really dung.

OVERALL OPINION

Really sound, including saturation, even that of my micro cube is better.
I had the 400th vieu of 13 years, I changed all the lights but nothing has to do is not the right vieu his marshall ==> rather see jcm 800.

edit 2009: APRS euphoria of the beginning, and more than a year of use, I changed my mind, a marshall stack what is more beautiful? OK but the sound was really clean except for the chi, one disto dribbling, pass the volume a 3, a slurry ingrable sound really dgueu, impossible to do anything especially in groups.
Has this amp up dgout me the guitar for several months, luckily I have since replaced.
I understand better why it is the cheapest jcm, marshall some are good yes but not the.
with distortion pedals is that huh, but it is useless to have a marshall amp crit.
my worst experience guitar.