M.Rod
Published on 11/12/07 at 14:56
Value For Money :
Excellent
I purchased this engine on the advice of Bcorde for a small two-way speaker quality for home use and small satellite. It accompanies a 8PS21.
I also trust the AF members who unanimously advise the DE10 those seeking a quality small engine.
Why do I speak of DE10? Because it is close to the ND1411-M, but the latter having a little more in the same configuration. And use is the same as it is mounted on the same flag that the DE10: ME10.
However, in such a configuration (with the ME10 is more acute than an engine of méduim-high), it is imperative to the filter, which is the case with my filter Bcorde.
Mylar diaphragm, neodymium magnet, 50 watts AES, 109dB! And what appears to be a natural attenuation beyond 10Khz.
SOUNDS
Despite a rather high sensitivity, the sound is pleasant and balanced with 94db of 8PS21. The filter is surely something
The words that come to mind are: smooth, finesse. Treble seem, I would say a little muffled, but no loss of momentum. In comparison, I would say a high quality tweeter but with more presence.
OVERALL OPINION
Utlisation for a little over a month, the time to do my impression to post this notice.
Not least, just a little regret: I heard on a house such as H100 or H101 of FCR, but there is something else ...
Just before, I had APT80, but even if it is a good tweeter, I do not think you can compare them. Otherwise, high-end, I had the opportunity to listen to RCF ART 312.
Good quality / price ratio when you consider that the equivalent in terms of characteristic at B & C costs about the same price.
I would do if this choice? I already know which engine to use for the treble of the three-way speaker that I will be ...
I give 9 / 10 to remain objective, 9 / 10 is already the maximum for me and I stop here my novel, because it's true that I'm pretty excited about this engine ...
I also trust the AF members who unanimously advise the DE10 those seeking a quality small engine.
Why do I speak of DE10? Because it is close to the ND1411-M, but the latter having a little more in the same configuration. And use is the same as it is mounted on the same flag that the DE10: ME10.
However, in such a configuration (with the ME10 is more acute than an engine of méduim-high), it is imperative to the filter, which is the case with my filter Bcorde.
Mylar diaphragm, neodymium magnet, 50 watts AES, 109dB! And what appears to be a natural attenuation beyond 10Khz.
SOUNDS
Despite a rather high sensitivity, the sound is pleasant and balanced with 94db of 8PS21. The filter is surely something
The words that come to mind are: smooth, finesse. Treble seem, I would say a little muffled, but no loss of momentum. In comparison, I would say a high quality tweeter but with more presence.
OVERALL OPINION
Utlisation for a little over a month, the time to do my impression to post this notice.
Not least, just a little regret: I heard on a house such as H100 or H101 of FCR, but there is something else ...
Just before, I had APT80, but even if it is a good tweeter, I do not think you can compare them. Otherwise, high-end, I had the opportunity to listen to RCF ART 312.
Good quality / price ratio when you consider that the equivalent in terms of characteristic at B & C costs about the same price.
I would do if this choice? I already know which engine to use for the treble of the three-way speaker that I will be ...
I give 9 / 10 to remain objective, 9 / 10 is already the maximum for me and I stop here my novel, because it's true that I'm pretty excited about this engine ...