.

UTILIZATION

.

SOUNDS

.

OVERALL OPINION

So it's been that I heard about this famous "ghost" and it's been awhile so I wanted to try for Roland and me it's a love story that has lasted 20 years (I had Juno 2, D20, an XP50 ....)
I always liked the grain Roland, hot enough ......
Well, the Fantom .... I finally tried today ....... and I'm sorry, it hurts me to say that the faithful, but very very very disappointing!! oh yes there very disappointed and this is the first time Roland disappoint me ....
Why disappointed? not that the sound is bad, but the evolution between the generation and XP50 fantom is minimal in small! I make the comparison with the Korg Triton, and again I know what I mean to have had the full range (M1, 01w, Trinity, Triton ).... and now I am a faithful Korg too! )
And although the sounds of the ghosts are really no better than the XP50 / 80! it looks the same! and for the price it costs, and although it's super disappointing! this account, I strongly advice to keep his or XP50 JV1080 ...... a guy who knows not much range for Roland Fantom can crack, it makes sense ..... but this much we know qd brand, and although there is now little progress ....

By Trintity and cons between a Triton, it's not the same story ....... and what's the Triton! So to all those who still hesitate between the two bikes, I slice literally Triton !!!!!!! (And yet I Necora once said, I love Roland)

Here you soon ...... ls zycos!

ps: my rating 2 / 10 does not match the sound quality itself, but the evolution over its Roland synths before ....