planetslide
Published on 09/13/06 at 08:15
I know the 1960 having only jou over quite often in the studio. So I think have a fairly objective view, because it tends to praise his gear.
Whatever anyone says, I would simply say that one is a REFERENCE in the minds of Contents 4 * 12 cabinet for heavy rock / hard rock. The sound and the ergonomics of the device are unanimously.
Marshall sound is typical, with screaming highs and low plutt not great decision. We love it or hate it: it must realize even at home, by testing the amps each other ct, is the only way.
There are a lot of competitors dsormais this cabinet, some of which are both less and more convincing onreux play mtal modern (the sharper, more heat, etc.).. It is mainly a history of bowls in fact ... and what is sent in!
I find the price of nine plutt from undue competition. There is also a lil ct "archi known / not original" trs not fun, but it is secondary to the sound.
Conclusion: it's good stuff typical hard rock, but plutt the price of the occasion ...
Whatever anyone says, I would simply say that one is a REFERENCE in the minds of Contents 4 * 12 cabinet for heavy rock / hard rock. The sound and the ergonomics of the device are unanimously.
Marshall sound is typical, with screaming highs and low plutt not great decision. We love it or hate it: it must realize even at home, by testing the amps each other ct, is the only way.
There are a lot of competitors dsormais this cabinet, some of which are both less and more convincing onreux play mtal modern (the sharper, more heat, etc.).. It is mainly a history of bowls in fact ... and what is sent in!
I find the price of nine plutt from undue competition. There is also a lil ct "archi known / not original" trs not fun, but it is secondary to the sound.
Conclusion: it's good stuff typical hard rock, but plutt the price of the occasion ...