All user reviews for the Pioneer CDJ-200

I DO NOT USE THEM YET since MARKETS ARE NOT YET BUT I HAVE TESTED ON THE STAND IN PIONEER SIEL.

WHAT IS VERY VERY VERY WELL IS .:

MP3 100% compatible with all functions
Loop adjustable real time
Loopback
CD Text
3 numriques paramtrables effects
Master Tempo
Loading the motorized slot in
renforcs the chassis vibration
Contrle the tempo
the Tempo Change: +/- 6% or +/- 10% or +/- 16%
Cue Function, Sampling using the Cue
Automatic Startup - Automatic return
Quick start
Jog Dial
Automatic Enchanement
Headphone output with adjustable level
Visualization of reading

VERY GOOD DECK BRAND PIONEER CD. All is cett time !!!!
THEY ARE BETTER THAN BCP CDJ100S

THE BIG CONCERN IS THE PRICE MUST RELY 599.00 VAT in TARGET PRICE TO BE ABLE TO THE OFFER !!!!

- How long have you use it?

Almost a year

- What is the particular feature you like best and least?

The +: Pioneer Quality. Simplicity (I begin: p). Notament play and cue buttons (I was mixing on Numark Axis 4 before. You understand !!)
The -: Not much, except for the Jog but now I'm used to. And then when you mix on mk2 mk3 or after ca seems much easier!

- Have you tried many other models before buying it?
Numark Axis 4, Pioneer cdj mk2, mk3 Pioneer CDJ400

- How would you rate the quality / price?
Excellent since I had two NEW pr 550 euros (EXCLUDING FDP). Ordered in the States!

- With experience, you do again this choice ...?
With the same budget, YES. To take there, there's no better but with a larger budget, I will opt for minimum mk2!

I use it for over 2 years.
I had a Gemini 3 has a voice before but nothing compares.

The +:
the effects of quality even if some are useless.
Product quality is solid knobs do not move a muscle !!

The -:
the filter that would better t on a single knob as 800 and DJM-700.
one more vote would have been pleasant

Price quality ratio very honest, the price for the pro stuff so if you are still too chre head to the Gemini Numark or behringer but watch out for surprises ... I find mine has 430 on thomann so good I can not find a excessive hindsight.

choice I would do well and I Videment board all Dj wanting acqurir a TRUE table quality.

How long you use it?
I use it for a year, I bought it for 150 euro on leboncoin unit, the only downside is that when I have received were the cue "touch" due to use (I put a spring bic pen below, since all is well

Did you tried many other models before buying it?
Cdj 350 and 800


What is so special that you love the most, least?

the +
That's good, pleasing to the touch, precise buttons etc. ...

the -
She does not read badly vbr (impossible to see the remaining time etc ...) and the mine appears occasionally an error E-8845 that requires me to turn them back.
She does not read either the usb but good for the price ...


How would you rate the quality / price? With experience, you do again this choice? Very good value for money and yes I would do this choice.

The Pioneer CDJ 200 is a pro cd and mp3 player. It is very compact and sleek with a very nice and stylish design that anyone can appreciate. As soon as you turn it on, it illuminates and looks great. The general use of the Pioneer cj 200 is very easy to understand. You will get it in no time without any manuals needed. The buttons on this device are very touch friendly. You don’t have to apply much pressure in order to get the function you want to work. A nice gentle push will do it, most other units similar to this one require you to put a forced pressure on the buttons to get them to operate.

The display on the Pioneer CDJ 200 is not that big though, this could be a deal breaker from some people. The unit itself isn’t very big so there really wasn’t room to put a bigger display or lcd. There are a few effects that I really like though, Zip effect is a pretty need effect if you use it properly. The Pioneer CDJ does not have to be used as a DJ tool if you don’t want it to. You can simply use it as a regular cd player if you wish. But if you are looking for a regular cd player I don’t recommend getting this because you wont need all of the effects, plus you wouldn’t want to pay that much just for a cd unit.

All in all you can expect a great quality product fro Pioneer , they normally create very powerful and stylish equipment and have a reputation for being one of the leading DJ equipment sellers across the world. You can go wrong with a Pioneer Product and the CDJ 200 will suit you just right. Grab on of these babies!

How long have you use it?

3 ½ years.


Have you tried many other models before buying it?

A function with Vestax scratch.


What is so special that you love the most, least?

+ Cue, effects (jet, wah, and zip), finish and quality of components and equipment, very robust, display ideal illumination of the buttons (it does not''Christmas tree'') /

- Loop function, although not very precise function to edit


How would you rate the quality / price?

I think Pioneer has always been expensive, this manufacturer uses its brand to inflate its prices but I have never been disappointed by this product, which is very high quality.


With experience, you do again this choice?

I would do this choice, if I was in 2008 of course. Now I will opt for the USB?

Those who have an opinion DSIR Global test of a person with both the denon DNS-1000/3000/5000 CDJ-100/200/1000 Pioneer DMP-550 and it is here: Here I come acqurir of the CDJ-200, I am not a follower of one brand or another, at least for Pioneer and Denon, but there are particularities according to the same two brands: Denon pr decision, pioneer (except DMP-550) robustness and reliability. There's nothing to do, all the Denon I had hands, it was sooner or later the problem mcaniques (heavy use). Never had this kind of problem with pioneer (certainly the oil shock and efficient trs mchanisme loading cd). The big difference between pio and denon certainly is almost forced to use the jog in pio (and price!). drrange which often adept denon. But then I started APRS MP3, I admit that none of all existing products meet me! denon lack of precision mp3 (and some effect not available for MP3, slow loading, and more especially vibrate strongly with the original cd: ineligible for products in this range! rem: when using CD-ROM pc must not ask for more). ditto for Pioneer DMP-550 a total dooope!. That's when j'apris out of the Pioneer CDJ-200 pseudo successor to the 100 with MP3, LOOP and more! I thought why not, you never know! your exact more than surprising! no vibration, mcanisme loading the same as the CDJ-100 (as well say incomparable), charging whatever the cd (orig, MP3, CDs are engraved with a rapidity unparalleled! short, cdj-100 more AND INTEGRATION precision of total mp3, they are used just like a original cd! conclusion: Exceeds all that exists (and say that I swore by the DNS-5000) in robustness, fast and precision! endurance level, I used for 12 hours now, without any stress. On or report Qualitprix superb. However, those who like scratching and other effects will dcu. Now all dpend what you want to do!

How long have you use it?
3 months

What is the particular feature you like best and least?
very easy to use, intuitive, robust and fast access to the beaches (even mp3)
self loop c is not bad but better to do by hand.
effects nont doriginal nothing but more than sufficient to isolate sounds interesting.

Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
Axis2: no, no Intrets, buttons without rponse .... numark koi!
AXIS9: the same, more features, but not reading any burned CDs not top! numark worse is the look really ugly!
CDJ100S: Very good entry-level, robust reliable, pioneer koi!
DNS5000: Platinum excellent but too complicated, such ment functions kon sy lost!

How do you report qualitprix?
excellent! for 400 euros to us was a really good deck that has nothing (if not the look) to envy the cdj1000mk2 if you do not scratch!

Exprience with, you will do again this choice? ..
without hsiter!

I use it recently (2 months).

I was looking for a platinum cd complment my turntables to play from time to time a sound that I possde on cd.
I turned to Pioneer for trs in good reputable Contents platinum cd.
Never mix on CD before, I find it quite difficult to catch a mix cd sound when compared to vinyl mix. But with a little practice you end it!

For this stage CHARACTERISTICS:
It possde 3 numriques effects simply gniaux.
A hold button keeps the effect RALIS.
The loops are gniales too!
A button is used to divide the loops, it can pretty couraging
effects, especially if you combine this with the effects numriques!
Pioneer is still same pain for the effects REALLY!

Regarding the recognition of CD, either one ORIGINAL cd, mp3, grav (whatever brand) recognition of the cd is trs fast, perfect on this!
The "surf" the cd is as fast trs.
The buttons also behave well trs!

the pitch is adjustable: 6 / 10 / 16%, which is INTERESTED in any type of mix.

Master tempo button can not PForm music when bcp pitch a song.

The Joggler can acclrer or slow music, or change an effect numrique.

Compar of other models in ranges infrieur (numark, gemini), Pioneer has positioned itself well above. Unfortunately I have not had the chance to test other models.

However, I find the price plutt lev. But as usual the quality is paid for ...!

If I had to redo this choice so why not!
Discoveries I have nothing better at the moment.

on the other hand, for the followers of scratch, rather to orient you a CDJ800 or 1000, as
with the CDJ-200 scratch is impossible, but it's not what I wanted.

Oh, and finally, this plate is really pretty trs!

The CDJ-200 is simply a beautiful platinum on both the design as its features. I wanted to share my exprience, so you make the right choice. Looking for a deck for beginners? The CDJ-200 will take you far!

Cue function, 3 effects (flange (jet), brake (zip) and hi-pass <-> low-pass (Wah)), perfect loop (or so depending on the reliability of self BPM) and loop with manual adjustment thanks to jog, master tempo or pitch trs large (high amplitude setting), auto cue, however, adjustable ... Many features for such a small jewelery! In addition, the keys are trsractives, the search folder with folder names, titles and artists makes using trs ease.

I noticed, however, some default. BPM is not prcis trs. Compared to my other platinum (vestax cdx-05) the bpm is totally DIFFERENT. / \ WARNING / \ display shows the dial just three digits for BPM -> ex: 128. No commas, no more precision unfortunately! You will have to work your ears.
The jog wheel (the ring) is a little too touchy my taste: you must turn it on pain of trsdlicatement drgler the dj cal pieces and say goodbye the mix! No pitch bend button to solve this little inconvnient. Do not worry it will come with training.
There is only one point of rprage, and it will eventually block you if you make a title DSIR mconnaissable or spend a breack pieces.
Another default trs minimal: the swallower disk does not have much Aptit! Must be pushed far enough disk before it enters the machine, which I think can be time consuming. This is a default but my comment is ridiculous trsdtaill!

I only say one thing: if you do not have money to pay the Pioneer CDJ-200, continue to SAVE, the purchase will not be a mistake.

find a video of the test plate on http://www.djresource.nl/Downloads/

It's been 3 months that I mix on Pioneer cdj 200 and I'm pretty happy.

First, it is beautiful at night as during the day. The many features are: auto-cue, three effects, precise pitch, seamless loop, master tempo and more. However, the grip is not easy at the pitch and jog lorqu'on particular is used to mix with another plate, unlike a CDJ800 or cdj 1000.
In summary, this is a perfect stage for home given its size, its price (480 €) and its functions, but rather turn to the cdj 800 if you have a large budget.