View other reviews for this product:
Negens
Published on 02/05/08 at 07:26
This is a super cardioid dynamic microphone directivity of German design, the application is primarily intended voice.
Rponse in frquence 40-18000 Hz
Sensitivity 2.0 mV / Pa 3 Db
Rjection rear (1kHz and 120)> 20db
Weight 365 g
46.6 mm Diameter
Length 186 mm
The design is solid is the micro looks robust, the grip is quite comfortable.
The grid is a dark blue that has its charm.
Being dynamic, sennheiser not jug useful to have a on / off button, which I regret all the same because it can be good sometimes cut off from his when scne is on. Particularly during installation / Uninstallation of stuff. (Yes, there's the nags that do not pay attention, then it is better that prvenir Larsen).
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for 6 months
This song has a micro Submitted particularity of a bump in the high level of its rponse curve, which can bring the presence, clarity of voice.
All voices will not fit this particular feature. But is your exact effective trs
Perconnellement, it suits me perfectly.
Voice (at least mine) seems hot Submitted in the micro and dynamism.
By making the grave a little qualisation, we get a good foundation for voice, these would not appear at all deaf.
The grave also seem better than Defines an SM58.
I feel good all changes in my singing through this microphone. (As part of a dynamic course).
In terms of the feedback rjection I d face once a dconvenue. Because of its sensitivity probably more important than SM58, ds in the rgisseur opened even if that only the portion of the console (a Yamaha 01V), the silent norm and feedback t was impossible to use. We fall back on an ad SM58 (which I like a little less ). May be this is he one of its super-cardioid directivity (which is against the SM58 cardioid)? I expect to have the opportunity to other rooms, other places, in order to be more catgories on this and whether it is a problem for the Feedback rjection or level of Output from the microphone.
The effect of proximity of the microphone is quite surprising to beginners and requires a little getting used to because it is far from being linear. But once again taken, this does parat drang over and all natural.
Another particularity is sensitive enough to dsaxage therefore Avoid as possible to have too much on the move.
If you dsaxez, senior mediums emerge more and you will have little effect nasal enjoyable, something like "a cold voice." It is even possible that your exact is violent.
Enjoyable surprise on a recording of electro-acoustic guitar strings steel. I placed the sennheiser junction sleeve / case. Render silent Fidler, balanced trs. However, it works hard enough condition to play (power chords) because the output level will not be enough for arpges softer, o an electro-static will be better suited.
He excels in return to electric guitar amp. I place it between the center of HP and the HP board and I have a good balance frquentiel trs. Fidler is trs sound of the amp, the bass does not drool, the mids are warm and prcis, treble are not made of fawn aggressive. The attacks are clearly apparent. I believe that this use is that I prfre more than singing.
I who complain about not finding my happiness between SM 57 and the Sennheiser E609, I am satisfied.
The E945 seems to me much warmer and has more serious Defines the SM58 that I have used on or in studio scne rpt. The SM58 microphone as a good but not suitable for my voice.
I needed a microphone with which I would feel good and what brought me sennheiser ds
the "first cries" this comfort. You know, that little thrill when playing a unique instrument that makes you want to push a "wooow", and not to arrter.
Regarding the report qualitprix, I would say it is worth its price, which certainly is not given but is fully justified. You for your money with this microphone.
With exprience, I would do without hsiter choice.
It is well suited to singing on scne, provided that the acoustics of the room is at least correct, otherwise it becomes ingrable trs feedback and went on quickly.
And I recommend TRS sincrement to use a guitar amp.
However, I feel obliged to me rquiper an SM58 in case o. Whatever is said, can always be counted anyway, the robustness and reliability of SM57 and SM58 in sound recording. (When things are not right, fortunately they are the
Rponse in frquence 40-18000 Hz
Sensitivity 2.0 mV / Pa 3 Db
Rjection rear (1kHz and 120)> 20db
Weight 365 g
46.6 mm Diameter
Length 186 mm
The design is solid is the micro looks robust, the grip is quite comfortable.
The grid is a dark blue that has its charm.
Being dynamic, sennheiser not jug useful to have a on / off button, which I regret all the same because it can be good sometimes cut off from his when scne is on. Particularly during installation / Uninstallation of stuff. (Yes, there's the nags that do not pay attention, then it is better that prvenir Larsen).
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for 6 months
This song has a micro Submitted particularity of a bump in the high level of its rponse curve, which can bring the presence, clarity of voice.
All voices will not fit this particular feature. But is your exact effective trs
Perconnellement, it suits me perfectly.
Voice (at least mine) seems hot Submitted in the micro and dynamism.
By making the grave a little qualisation, we get a good foundation for voice, these would not appear at all deaf.
The grave also seem better than Defines an SM58.
I feel good all changes in my singing through this microphone. (As part of a dynamic course).
In terms of the feedback rjection I d face once a dconvenue. Because of its sensitivity probably more important than SM58, ds in the rgisseur opened even if that only the portion of the console (a Yamaha 01V), the silent norm and feedback t was impossible to use. We fall back on an ad SM58 (which I like a little less ). May be this is he one of its super-cardioid directivity (which is against the SM58 cardioid)? I expect to have the opportunity to other rooms, other places, in order to be more catgories on this and whether it is a problem for the Feedback rjection or level of Output from the microphone.
The effect of proximity of the microphone is quite surprising to beginners and requires a little getting used to because it is far from being linear. But once again taken, this does parat drang over and all natural.
Another particularity is sensitive enough to dsaxage therefore Avoid as possible to have too much on the move.
If you dsaxez, senior mediums emerge more and you will have little effect nasal enjoyable, something like "a cold voice." It is even possible that your exact is violent.
Enjoyable surprise on a recording of electro-acoustic guitar strings steel. I placed the sennheiser junction sleeve / case. Render silent Fidler, balanced trs. However, it works hard enough condition to play (power chords) because the output level will not be enough for arpges softer, o an electro-static will be better suited.
He excels in return to electric guitar amp. I place it between the center of HP and the HP board and I have a good balance frquentiel trs. Fidler is trs sound of the amp, the bass does not drool, the mids are warm and prcis, treble are not made of fawn aggressive. The attacks are clearly apparent. I believe that this use is that I prfre more than singing.
I who complain about not finding my happiness between SM 57 and the Sennheiser E609, I am satisfied.
The E945 seems to me much warmer and has more serious Defines the SM58 that I have used on or in studio scne rpt. The SM58 microphone as a good but not suitable for my voice.
I needed a microphone with which I would feel good and what brought me sennheiser ds
the "first cries" this comfort. You know, that little thrill when playing a unique instrument that makes you want to push a "wooow", and not to arrter.
Regarding the report qualitprix, I would say it is worth its price, which certainly is not given but is fully justified. You for your money with this microphone.
With exprience, I would do without hsiter choice.
It is well suited to singing on scne, provided that the acoustics of the room is at least correct, otherwise it becomes ingrable trs feedback and went on quickly.
And I recommend TRS sincrement to use a guitar amp.
However, I feel obliged to me rquiper an SM58 in case o. Whatever is said, can always be counted anyway, the robustness and reliability of SM57 and SM58 in sound recording. (When things are not right, fortunately they are the