sygwel
Note : 4 sur 10
Published on 05/19/08 at 03:10
It is a condenser microphone with tape Intgr 2x100W amp. not bad, right?
but not see other reviews for this micro CHARACTERISTICS classic.
OVERALL OPINION
Like many, I always used the SM58 repeating and scnes (small) without asking me too many questions.
reading the other reviews here Submitted, I bought a t-bone MB85 to compare, because I had a hard sound to correct the singer of my group.
APRS 2 / 3 permutations, the shure seemed so closed that repeats it ended with the t-bone and that it will remain in place for our configuration.
may be we can take the good with the shure if we have the-ing sound and the gear that goes well, but it is not our case, and it is not for rsolument all voices.
if the SM58 DGIG a lot of quality, it is not adapted at all, and not resume notament a shrill voice clear and Submitted fawn over a mix.
to use a different view: take time to choose the microphone that is your purpose, without jump on this "standard" that displays a report qualitprix questionable.
but not see other reviews for this micro CHARACTERISTICS classic.
OVERALL OPINION
Like many, I always used the SM58 repeating and scnes (small) without asking me too many questions.
reading the other reviews here Submitted, I bought a t-bone MB85 to compare, because I had a hard sound to correct the singer of my group.
APRS 2 / 3 permutations, the shure seemed so closed that repeats it ended with the t-bone and that it will remain in place for our configuration.
may be we can take the good with the shure if we have the-ing sound and the gear that goes well, but it is not our case, and it is not for rsolument all voices.
if the SM58 DGIG a lot of quality, it is not adapted at all, and not resume notament a shrill voice clear and Submitted fawn over a mix.
to use a different view: take time to choose the microphone that is your purpose, without jump on this "standard" that displays a report qualitprix questionable.