View other reviews for this product:
alba7
Published on 01/31/07 at 14:34
I have a MacBook Pro Processor 2.13 and 2GB of RAM memory
APRS many hsitation, I opt for the solution pro-tools. So for digidiseign. The mbox 2 as poorly plutt ct digi 002 and a bit too expensive for me, I DCID this Mbox2 pro (with the factory option).
I record my voice and my main guitar and think to use it to record concerts and RPTES
UTILIZATION
The instalation is trs peinible and long (I'm telling trs to have invested 150 euro more for the professional help in the Contents!). They protgent and they are right, but suddenly the number of codes of conduct containing opration is fastudieuse trs.
For plug-in requires a factory iLock cl. Think cre an account with them before starting any facilities pro-tools. we did not do right away and when we enter the user name iLock in pro-tools, we put one unaware that could be used dj (which is I glimpse later when I made my account iLock!). L is the galre since digidiseign will send the security code on the wrong account!
So many difficulties in the rtable situation.
on the other hand after the installation completes, a real rgale, worked wonderfully! Too bad the program does not be translated into French! But the manual is provided on Franais CDrom trs is clear and intuitive program trs
By using a ingnieur / IT professional I normment economy of time and I do not regret the investment
GETTING STARTED
I currently only pro-tools, which emplement enough for me to compose arrange and record.
The latency of dpend rglages performed in pro-tools. For me the latency is inaudible.
The recording quality surprised me for good! With microphones lctronique Se 3 and a beta 58. Is your exact thunder!
My folk guitar plugs directly into the mbox has allucinant sound, beautiful! The classic Gitare takes a little more work APRS correction record.
I record my voice with the beta 58 (no budget at this time for a real studio vocal mic). The result is not too bad, but still a quality of work and I would not mock him. The lack of precision voice, sounds a bit dull and is somewhat artificially colored. Many rglage APRS shot for drinking something (for a rest against a beautiful micro scne for!)
Save is a breeze, by reworking its application against a sacred exprience that I have not yet
OVERALL OPINION
I've had a month and I rgale.
She surely a default, but for me and I asked her, she is perfect. If I record a CD option studio seems to me essential. The advantage is that I can go with the track dj commplter registered to me and what I could not do. The mastrisation is not my mtier and even with pro-tools HD home and a super stuff I need to call the professionals.
So this pro Mbox2 Fully completed its rle:
- Lgre and transportable
- The quality of registration satisfies me (from the classical music world, I have a sensitive ear plutt Sonxai natutels)
- Pro-tools is a enjoyable utilisbr trs />
Voil there are cheaper on the market and we Digidiseign nibbles of all sub cts ... but I would do this same choice with eyes closed
APRS many hsitation, I opt for the solution pro-tools. So for digidiseign. The mbox 2 as poorly plutt ct digi 002 and a bit too expensive for me, I DCID this Mbox2 pro (with the factory option).
I record my voice and my main guitar and think to use it to record concerts and RPTES
UTILIZATION
The instalation is trs peinible and long (I'm telling trs to have invested 150 euro more for the professional help in the Contents!). They protgent and they are right, but suddenly the number of codes of conduct containing opration is fastudieuse trs.
For plug-in requires a factory iLock cl. Think cre an account with them before starting any facilities pro-tools. we did not do right away and when we enter the user name iLock in pro-tools, we put one unaware that could be used dj (which is I glimpse later when I made my account iLock!). L is the galre since digidiseign will send the security code on the wrong account!
So many difficulties in the rtable situation.
on the other hand after the installation completes, a real rgale, worked wonderfully! Too bad the program does not be translated into French! But the manual is provided on Franais CDrom trs is clear and intuitive program trs
By using a ingnieur / IT professional I normment economy of time and I do not regret the investment
GETTING STARTED
I currently only pro-tools, which emplement enough for me to compose arrange and record.
The latency of dpend rglages performed in pro-tools. For me the latency is inaudible.
The recording quality surprised me for good! With microphones lctronique Se 3 and a beta 58. Is your exact thunder!
My folk guitar plugs directly into the mbox has allucinant sound, beautiful! The classic Gitare takes a little more work APRS correction record.
I record my voice with the beta 58 (no budget at this time for a real studio vocal mic). The result is not too bad, but still a quality of work and I would not mock him. The lack of precision voice, sounds a bit dull and is somewhat artificially colored. Many rglage APRS shot for drinking something (for a rest against a beautiful micro scne for!)
Save is a breeze, by reworking its application against a sacred exprience that I have not yet
OVERALL OPINION
I've had a month and I rgale.
She surely a default, but for me and I asked her, she is perfect. If I record a CD option studio seems to me essential. The advantage is that I can go with the track dj commplter registered to me and what I could not do. The mastrisation is not my mtier and even with pro-tools HD home and a super stuff I need to call the professionals.
So this pro Mbox2 Fully completed its rle:
- Lgre and transportable
- The quality of registration satisfies me (from the classical music world, I have a sensitive ear plutt Sonxai natutels)
- Pro-tools is a enjoyable utilisbr trs />
Voil there are cheaper on the market and we Digidiseign nibbles of all sub cts ... but I would do this same choice with eyes closed