View other reviews for this product:
Tonka
Published on 10/13/09 at 23:35
Installation nickel. J'apprcie the relationship of trust that the editor offers the user: no iLock or whatnot no limitation usr version valuation, following the two rates we use the bte, no flicage ... It's rare enough to be stressed.
The manual is excellent, in English, but there is an initiative of translation in French (search the forum) ...
Software trslger, trs super stable and fast.
It is not against it by francis is updated polusieurs times a year, taking into account the suggestions of users (which would not be possible if we had to translate every time) .. I personally prfre non Frenchified version, a version hurt Francisc ...
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
Anything. My setup is not so much rcente trs powerful and not in terms of what is happening now: laptop centrino 1.2 GHz, 1 GB of memory ... (I think).
Short runs without a problem and much faster than Cubase SX for example.
OVERALL OPINION
J'tais Cubase for 18 years and I pass by Reaper for about 3 months. I tell this adventure here ( https://fr.audiofanzine.com/sequenceur-generaliste/cockos/Reaper-3/forums/t.363369,en-passage-de-cubase-vers-reaper-peut-etre.html ) ...
Difficult to say which particular feature I like most. The routing is super powerful, but I think what I like is the phlosophie gnrale software. Everything is possible, everything is configurable: it's not short the software that requires the fawn to work, but the user. Tight deadlines and to work on trs diffrent DIFFERENT projects. You can configure it for use "cubase-like" axis or a more "electro-live" ... A pleasure.
There are also a myriad of functions which can happen but they are matrise ds, open up new horizons: twelve o'clock gniaux plugins, templates of tracks, superimposed tempos DIFFERENT, routings volumes s. ..
I miss just the audio from Cubase containers, but it can be even when dbrouiller parat otherwise and it is being implmentation ... follow. A little too low for the audio edition, but it can work with an external editor.
Unlike Previous notice I did not not weak export audio (but there's a lot of options are available that allow an export in poorer quality may be one of these options silent she selected) and I think the software is recommended for use is pro.
This is not a scattering gas can not take control ... and the community (or French internationnale) around the software, though small in number seems quite dynamic.
Reaper is not only an outsider in the field of DAW, and expensive mons its class ... I would be inclined to say that it is my opinion over its competitors (Cubase, Logic, Sonar ...) on almost all points. So why not use it ... Try it. <img class="smiley" src="/images/audiofanzine/interface/smileys/icon_wink.gif" alt="wink" />
The manual is excellent, in English, but there is an initiative of translation in French (search the forum) ...
Software trslger, trs super stable and fast.
It is not against it by francis is updated polusieurs times a year, taking into account the suggestions of users (which would not be possible if we had to translate every time) .. I personally prfre non Frenchified version, a version hurt Francisc ...
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
Anything. My setup is not so much rcente trs powerful and not in terms of what is happening now: laptop centrino 1.2 GHz, 1 GB of memory ... (I think).
Short runs without a problem and much faster than Cubase SX for example.
OVERALL OPINION
J'tais Cubase for 18 years and I pass by Reaper for about 3 months. I tell this adventure here ( https://fr.audiofanzine.com/sequenceur-generaliste/cockos/Reaper-3/forums/t.363369,en-passage-de-cubase-vers-reaper-peut-etre.html ) ...
Difficult to say which particular feature I like most. The routing is super powerful, but I think what I like is the phlosophie gnrale software. Everything is possible, everything is configurable: it's not short the software that requires the fawn to work, but the user. Tight deadlines and to work on trs diffrent DIFFERENT projects. You can configure it for use "cubase-like" axis or a more "electro-live" ... A pleasure.
There are also a myriad of functions which can happen but they are matrise ds, open up new horizons: twelve o'clock gniaux plugins, templates of tracks, superimposed tempos DIFFERENT, routings volumes s. ..
I miss just the audio from Cubase containers, but it can be even when dbrouiller parat otherwise and it is being implmentation ... follow. A little too low for the audio edition, but it can work with an external editor.
Unlike Previous notice I did not not weak export audio (but there's a lot of options are available that allow an export in poorer quality may be one of these options silent she selected) and I think the software is recommended for use is pro.
This is not a scattering gas can not take control ... and the community (or French internationnale) around the software, though small in number seems quite dynamic.
Reaper is not only an outsider in the field of DAW, and expensive mons its class ... I would be inclined to say that it is my opinion over its competitors (Cubase, Logic, Sonar ...) on almost all points. So why not use it ... Try it. <img class="smiley" src="/images/audiofanzine/interface/smileys/icon_wink.gif" alt="wink" />