View other reviews for this product:
OcinProd
Published on 03/01/06 at 03:59
The installation of this software and no problems Submitted automatically installed and rev quickly, the box Magix Music Studio Deluxe 2006 includes 3 software for the sound: Magix Music Studio Deluxe 2006, Magix MIDI Studio Deluxe 2006 and multimedia player if it also contains software for viewing photos, etc ... But I do not know and do not use them.
It is possible to have some incompatibility or with other software or with the configuration of the pc. (For example: on my pc I do not know of or have this incompatibility, but I can not make use of MAGIX MIDI studio was part of the package when I double click on the icons, the software You Started but closes after 3 seconds).
Other than that the configuration is almost intuitive gnrale (if adj some knowledge in this area) but do not get lost and many connatre the configuration of your PC. (There are vidos tutorial on the installation CD if necessary ...)
Regarding the manual I think it focuses too much on using Magix MIDI Studio Deluxe 2006 and not enough on Magix Music Studio Deluxe 2006, but it is perfectly clear and explicit understanding of reading THE FIRST . (I for one hardly ever uses the manual, I prfre me "walk" in the software and learn all alone, it is quite easy to use)
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
My PC config:
-Motherboard: As rock-880 Dual 775 Pro
-Processor: Intel Pentium 4 Processor 630 @ 3Ghz, LGA775 Pkg, 2MB L2 cache, 800 MHz FSB.
-Memory: 1x 512 MB PC3200 400 + 1 x 256MB PC3200 400
-Hard Drive: 160 GB Samsung
-Sound Card: Hercules Muse 5.1 DVD full duplex
-Video card: ATI Radon 64MB
Writer-cdr / cdrw: Sony
-DVD / DVDRAM: Samsung
With this config software Magix Music Studio Deluxe 2006 trs works well except when there is: too many track reading too much effect in this case CPU utilization Exceeds 100% and gives the equivalence of a trs ray disc but this is easily remdiable by increasing the memory buffer (a function available from the software) but the handling inconvnients as the loading time of a piece reading and the addition or rglage effect in real time no longer exists.
OVERALL OPINION
I use Magix Music Studio Deluxe 2006 since November or December 2005 but for me that does not rev up good day because I use a year since DJ Magix Music Studio Deluxe 2005.
In the software Magix Music Studio Deluxe 2006 I really like are intuitive and quite nice, I like the effect in real time, which allows her SETTING THE quicker and better, more feature of Does mastering have addition from the 2005 version, also it is possible to add VST effect pluggins audio but plays a rle Whereas as a good reading of the song so much track it y a.
against this by a little less I like is the constant use of the CPU when recording or playing, more when recording multiple tracks should be the dj rgler ACCS path recorded files or know where he is put in place a change of the file container, as it happened to me several times to lose files saved in which case the software does not know there are no more or pick them up or so the song is damn rsultat.
So today I set up following a system that ranking with a record spcial source files by piece so I lose nothing (everyone's mthode).
Finally I think, no, I'm sure the software is to report / quality excellent.
Its price is largely infrieur from the capacity of Fast Fashion offered by this software (I'll put a 10/10 ...)
A choice of software I do not regret at all, but I did not test the other.
It is possible to have some incompatibility or with other software or with the configuration of the pc. (For example: on my pc I do not know of or have this incompatibility, but I can not make use of MAGIX MIDI studio was part of the package when I double click on the icons, the software You Started but closes after 3 seconds).
Other than that the configuration is almost intuitive gnrale (if adj some knowledge in this area) but do not get lost and many connatre the configuration of your PC. (There are vidos tutorial on the installation CD if necessary ...)
Regarding the manual I think it focuses too much on using Magix MIDI Studio Deluxe 2006 and not enough on Magix Music Studio Deluxe 2006, but it is perfectly clear and explicit understanding of reading THE FIRST . (I for one hardly ever uses the manual, I prfre me "walk" in the software and learn all alone, it is quite easy to use)
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
My PC config:
-Motherboard: As rock-880 Dual 775 Pro
-Processor: Intel Pentium 4 Processor 630 @ 3Ghz, LGA775 Pkg, 2MB L2 cache, 800 MHz FSB.
-Memory: 1x 512 MB PC3200 400 + 1 x 256MB PC3200 400
-Hard Drive: 160 GB Samsung
-Sound Card: Hercules Muse 5.1 DVD full duplex
-Video card: ATI Radon 64MB
Writer-cdr / cdrw: Sony
-DVD / DVDRAM: Samsung
With this config software Magix Music Studio Deluxe 2006 trs works well except when there is: too many track reading too much effect in this case CPU utilization Exceeds 100% and gives the equivalence of a trs ray disc but this is easily remdiable by increasing the memory buffer (a function available from the software) but the handling inconvnients as the loading time of a piece reading and the addition or rglage effect in real time no longer exists.
OVERALL OPINION
I use Magix Music Studio Deluxe 2006 since November or December 2005 but for me that does not rev up good day because I use a year since DJ Magix Music Studio Deluxe 2005.
In the software Magix Music Studio Deluxe 2006 I really like are intuitive and quite nice, I like the effect in real time, which allows her SETTING THE quicker and better, more feature of Does mastering have addition from the 2005 version, also it is possible to add VST effect pluggins audio but plays a rle Whereas as a good reading of the song so much track it y a.
against this by a little less I like is the constant use of the CPU when recording or playing, more when recording multiple tracks should be the dj rgler ACCS path recorded files or know where he is put in place a change of the file container, as it happened to me several times to lose files saved in which case the software does not know there are no more or pick them up or so the song is damn rsultat.
So today I set up following a system that ranking with a record spcial source files by piece so I lose nothing (everyone's mthode).
Finally I think, no, I'm sure the software is to report / quality excellent.
Its price is largely infrieur from the capacity of Fast Fashion offered by this software (I'll put a 10/10 ...)
A choice of software I do not regret at all, but I did not test the other.