View other reviews for this product:
musinfoarts
Published on 08/05/06 at 12:08
- The installation is done it without problems?
Yes, I is not met dificult.
- Have you experienced any incompatibilities?
No, cubase is designed to accept all types of equipment, Hardware and Software appoints.
- The general configuration is easy?
Yes, the manual tells us the good implementations.
- The manual is clear and sufficient?
The manual is very clear and effective for a quick start. However, for deeper, I recommend the official guide published by Eyrolles where there are all detailed functions and documentation on the mixing and mastering.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
- What is the configuration of your computer?
PC Windows XP Pro SP1 and Intel 2.4 Ghz
Motherboard: MSI 648 Max
Hard Drives: Internal 80 GB Seagate and Lacie external USB 160 GB
RAM: 1 GB DDR
External Audio Interface: Terratec Phase 26 USB
- The software works he correctly on this configuration?
I have some time, but it is rare, close the program without notice. So I have to save Souvant. But this is not the fault of Cubase. Bian is my config. My CPU is not powerful Assé (a 3 GHz would be very good) and j'aurrais need a minimum of 2 GB of Ram. This course depands amounts of tracks and effects used in the project.
I have a master keyboard "Midistudio" and my sound card "Terratec Phase 26" work perfectly.
OVERALL OPINION
- How long have you use it?
I have been using on 01/03/2006
- What is so special that you like most and least?
Its versatility. I make recordings, the arrangement with virtual instruments, mixing. it does not Bonche. We can work with audio files without any problems. it is not as flexible in this area that Samplitude, but when you know it well, no worries.
there some feature I miss from SX2: The inability to insert plug-in effects directly in the library, there is no track In, and a lack of convenient options in the console set for all channels simultaneously (ie the option "extended console." This concerns all EQ settings and effects). To do this, we must make these settings for each track separately. The imposibilité also to an effect only in the middle of a track. Either we dupplique track, or we create an effect send.
But these annoyances can also be passed when you know Sufis its software for users and does not go SX known.
I chose Cubase for compatibility with Mac.
Very bein for the Home Studio.
- Have you tried many other models before buying it?
I tried Magix Studio, Samplitude, FL Studio Producer Edition, Cubase SX and have used it. I was really seduced by Cubase SL3 for that usability, flexibility and level of work.
- How would you rate the quality / price?
Really excellent!
- With experience, you do again this choice? ...
Sometimes twice a day and the next version will be SX to find the little details sity above.
Yes, I is not met dificult.
- Have you experienced any incompatibilities?
No, cubase is designed to accept all types of equipment, Hardware and Software appoints.
- The general configuration is easy?
Yes, the manual tells us the good implementations.
- The manual is clear and sufficient?
The manual is very clear and effective for a quick start. However, for deeper, I recommend the official guide published by Eyrolles where there are all detailed functions and documentation on the mixing and mastering.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
- What is the configuration of your computer?
PC Windows XP Pro SP1 and Intel 2.4 Ghz
Motherboard: MSI 648 Max
Hard Drives: Internal 80 GB Seagate and Lacie external USB 160 GB
RAM: 1 GB DDR
External Audio Interface: Terratec Phase 26 USB
- The software works he correctly on this configuration?
I have some time, but it is rare, close the program without notice. So I have to save Souvant. But this is not the fault of Cubase. Bian is my config. My CPU is not powerful Assé (a 3 GHz would be very good) and j'aurrais need a minimum of 2 GB of Ram. This course depands amounts of tracks and effects used in the project.
I have a master keyboard "Midistudio" and my sound card "Terratec Phase 26" work perfectly.
OVERALL OPINION
- How long have you use it?
I have been using on 01/03/2006
- What is so special that you like most and least?
Its versatility. I make recordings, the arrangement with virtual instruments, mixing. it does not Bonche. We can work with audio files without any problems. it is not as flexible in this area that Samplitude, but when you know it well, no worries.
there some feature I miss from SX2: The inability to insert plug-in effects directly in the library, there is no track In, and a lack of convenient options in the console set for all channels simultaneously (ie the option "extended console." This concerns all EQ settings and effects). To do this, we must make these settings for each track separately. The imposibilité also to an effect only in the middle of a track. Either we dupplique track, or we create an effect send.
But these annoyances can also be passed when you know Sufis its software for users and does not go SX known.
I chose Cubase for compatibility with Mac.
Very bein for the Home Studio.
- Have you tried many other models before buying it?
I tried Magix Studio, Samplitude, FL Studio Producer Edition, Cubase SX and have used it. I was really seduced by Cubase SL3 for that usability, flexibility and level of work.
- How would you rate the quality / price?
Really excellent!
- With experience, you do again this choice? ...
Sometimes twice a day and the next version will be SX to find the little details sity above.