tibo67
Note : 8 sur 10
Published on 10/10/04 at 03:33
I will not dwell on the characteristics given that everybody has already described.
UTILIZATION
The use is intuitive. There's just plug and change settings as QLQ a head amp to approach what we want.
I find the level that happens to approach the Mode Four (which for me is the only powerful in its Marshall). Apart from that we get the Marshall sound without big surprise. (I'm a fan of Mesa).
I board no manual as I bought used, but this machine is so intuitive it's not like a TriAxis (full of subtleties him).
SOUNDS
I'm more metal-oriented (different kinds) but I also rock the blues and a little pop rock.Ce preamp is not the one I use most since I board of other stuff in stock. Now I think he can be versatile enough (even if I place it below the TriAx tjs).
I play guitar so I get proper sound easy, it helps.
The sound I like most is the dynamic type fatty Mode Four qd I play the rhythm.
on the other hand for solo I do not like the Marshall distortion (too bland for me).
I do not use it either in its clean (except exeptions) because I board anything for that.
OVERALL OPINION
I do not since ais super longtps not bad but I board her bosse's.
I like the fact that we get a big distortion (like Neo) but must be behind the rest of the stuff I guess that makes him no less.
What I like least is that this lack of precision in the reglages.Autant TriAxis head can be taken because of that (for some) as sometimes I find it lacks a little something to get a QLQ I want exactly.
I found a TriAxis before buying and it is therefore back up this dernier.Je say that it is a good compromise qd can not go on to get the big Mesa son.Ca is cheaper and easier to implement.
As I bought a friend ais I board had the time to decide to buy it. So I think I will take it (especially if I had not Mesa).
UTILIZATION
The use is intuitive. There's just plug and change settings as QLQ a head amp to approach what we want.
I find the level that happens to approach the Mode Four (which for me is the only powerful in its Marshall). Apart from that we get the Marshall sound without big surprise. (I'm a fan of Mesa).
I board no manual as I bought used, but this machine is so intuitive it's not like a TriAxis (full of subtleties him).
SOUNDS
I'm more metal-oriented (different kinds) but I also rock the blues and a little pop rock.Ce preamp is not the one I use most since I board of other stuff in stock. Now I think he can be versatile enough (even if I place it below the TriAx tjs).
I play guitar so I get proper sound easy, it helps.
The sound I like most is the dynamic type fatty Mode Four qd I play the rhythm.
on the other hand for solo I do not like the Marshall distortion (too bland for me).
I do not use it either in its clean (except exeptions) because I board anything for that.
OVERALL OPINION
I do not since ais super longtps not bad but I board her bosse's.
I like the fact that we get a big distortion (like Neo) but must be behind the rest of the stuff I guess that makes him no less.
What I like least is that this lack of precision in the reglages.Autant TriAxis head can be taken because of that (for some) as sometimes I find it lacks a little something to get a QLQ I want exactly.
I found a TriAxis before buying and it is therefore back up this dernier.Je say that it is a good compromise qd can not go on to get the big Mesa son.Ca is cheaper and easier to implement.
As I bought a friend ais I board had the time to decide to buy it. So I think I will take it (especially if I had not Mesa).