iXtlan23
Published on 05/26/04 at 17:06
Bandepassante: 37-23 kHz (@ + /-3db 1m)
architecture two-way bass-reflex (event back)
2 woofer 15cm Esotec polypropylene (model 17w75) coil 2.5pouces!
1 dome tweeter 28mm Esotec (model D28)
power 200W RMS (500W continuous / 1000W peak-10 ms-)
volume of 17 liters firm
continuous 86dB sensitivity
Pressure level SPL 1m 130dB peak!
crossover frequency 2000Hz
6 ohms impedance
Gold-plated terminal connections
These speakers have the same Dynaudio Audience tranducteurs and the same filters as those mountains on the Dynaudio Acoustics M1 and M1.5 (I will not mention it here so the price is prohibitive for a homestudio). In addition it includes a layer of bitumen inside the cabinet for better magnetic shielding which allows to put a proximity of a computer screen without fear of the matrix to deform every 2 minutes
Personally, I'm sure I will not be alone, I find these small audience absolutely fabulous 120. its very analityque and completely linear (quality Dynaudio!) 37-23kHz (whereas M1 does not go down "only" up to 50hz (this is explained with the difference in volume of 4 liters of the firm). It is possible to couple with the Dynaudio Subwoofers SUB20A or SUB30A linearis perfect for up to 23Hz!
Hearing the 120LR offers a perfect representation of the audio spectrum both in terms of Linear dynamic than or stereo image, even at low volume or in frequencies difficult or much of the forum is likely to weaken it keeps all (on a solo bass drums, the bass drum very clearly defined through an excellent definition of the frequencies between 40 and 100 Hz while maintaining a very good dynamic.)
Passive speakers, it requires a certain power amplifier for maximum performance (sural predict an amp type CROWN Amcron, QSC, BRYSTON, or a bi-amplifier system because as you know already, a fan of Audiofanzine, to maximize a passive speaker should be "over-amplifiquot;! (predict roughly 2 times the RMS power of the amps on the speakers. (and not to fund a watts evidment
In ca also lies a great advantage of passive systems with the system active, as no system is active over-amplification (of the fariquant not take the risk, and that's understandable, of to market of systems a user can not experiment by simply explode the volume the background ...." allo SAV? bah I ruined my new pair of BM6A is to shit your thing! "(chuis on it would've reached
When we speak of a pregnant fateful question keeps coming up: "This studio speakers or hi-fi?" ds that comes out in a certain range that question is no longer necessary to be! Indeed Inquiring any speaker designer and he tells you "sound system, hi-fi, monitor, it's pipo! Ago good sound and bad sound !!"... Let me explain. Carracteristique the first in a chamber are:
What is its bandwidth (a + /-3db!), the Linear's response curve, sensitivity continuous sound pressure maxium that the enclosure can reach (in db SPL 1 meter), power (watts RMS ) in peak power handling (and for how TMPS). This applies both in stereo studio monitor.
The difference is mainly that when in the lower range (without talking about low-end) it is necessary for manufacturers to make a choice (eg bandwidth or Linear?). This choice is recess for reasons of cost. Out a good speaker monitor will not make concession (or let's say a minimum) and will carracteristiques good at both of its bandwidth as its sensitivity to the linearity and so on.
But where they are really very strong in Dynaudio is that after the famous transducer builds upon the range Esotec (directly from BEYOND ESOTAR technology team that the models most high-end has several tens of thousands of euros the enclosure!)) they use both for their hi-fi speakers (Dynaudio) in their range monitors (Dynaudio Acoustics), and while the performances are pretty much the same, prices are doubled for monitors (ca qd is expensive even just for that y'ait marked "acoustics" and more
Of course I'm talking about passive speakers, not models of assets (the price of the amp increasing the overall price of the enclosure, normal).
To illustrate my point about the use of hi-fi speakers in the studio I invite you to take a look at the different sites of major studio and see how systems use Dynaudio (Audience and Contour) in proximity monitoring cot Auratone of other B & W for both the mix, mastering the Postprod, and see how the studios, unwanted systems TAD (manufacturer of hi-fi speakers very high end) in main monitor (see (Electric Lady Studio, Studio Mega, etc.).
- In short I will not dwell long tirade but all this has only one goal, put a few things and try to silence some beliefs such as "monitor or stereo?" or it's better to say "good sound or bad sound?" And do not kid, a good speaker is expensive, so we are not saying that a pair of TRUTH B2031 is better than a pair of Dynaudio Audience or contour is seen that labeled monitor top ....
architecture two-way bass-reflex (event back)
2 woofer 15cm Esotec polypropylene (model 17w75) coil 2.5pouces!
1 dome tweeter 28mm Esotec (model D28)
power 200W RMS (500W continuous / 1000W peak-10 ms-)
volume of 17 liters firm
continuous 86dB sensitivity
Pressure level SPL 1m 130dB peak!
crossover frequency 2000Hz
6 ohms impedance
Gold-plated terminal connections
These speakers have the same Dynaudio Audience tranducteurs and the same filters as those mountains on the Dynaudio Acoustics M1 and M1.5 (I will not mention it here so the price is prohibitive for a homestudio). In addition it includes a layer of bitumen inside the cabinet for better magnetic shielding which allows to put a proximity of a computer screen without fear of the matrix to deform every 2 minutes
Personally, I'm sure I will not be alone, I find these small audience absolutely fabulous 120. its very analityque and completely linear (quality Dynaudio!) 37-23kHz (whereas M1 does not go down "only" up to 50hz (this is explained with the difference in volume of 4 liters of the firm). It is possible to couple with the Dynaudio Subwoofers SUB20A or SUB30A linearis perfect for up to 23Hz!
Hearing the 120LR offers a perfect representation of the audio spectrum both in terms of Linear dynamic than or stereo image, even at low volume or in frequencies difficult or much of the forum is likely to weaken it keeps all (on a solo bass drums, the bass drum very clearly defined through an excellent definition of the frequencies between 40 and 100 Hz while maintaining a very good dynamic.)
Passive speakers, it requires a certain power amplifier for maximum performance (sural predict an amp type CROWN Amcron, QSC, BRYSTON, or a bi-amplifier system because as you know already, a fan of Audiofanzine, to maximize a passive speaker should be "over-amplifiquot;! (predict roughly 2 times the RMS power of the amps on the speakers. (and not to fund a watts evidment
In ca also lies a great advantage of passive systems with the system active, as no system is active over-amplification (of the fariquant not take the risk, and that's understandable, of to market of systems a user can not experiment by simply explode the volume the background ...." allo SAV? bah I ruined my new pair of BM6A is to shit your thing! "(chuis on it would've reached
When we speak of a pregnant fateful question keeps coming up: "This studio speakers or hi-fi?" ds that comes out in a certain range that question is no longer necessary to be! Indeed Inquiring any speaker designer and he tells you "sound system, hi-fi, monitor, it's pipo! Ago good sound and bad sound !!"... Let me explain. Carracteristique the first in a chamber are:
What is its bandwidth (a + /-3db!), the Linear's response curve, sensitivity continuous sound pressure maxium that the enclosure can reach (in db SPL 1 meter), power (watts RMS ) in peak power handling (and for how TMPS). This applies both in stereo studio monitor.
The difference is mainly that when in the lower range (without talking about low-end) it is necessary for manufacturers to make a choice (eg bandwidth or Linear?). This choice is recess for reasons of cost. Out a good speaker monitor will not make concession (or let's say a minimum) and will carracteristiques good at both of its bandwidth as its sensitivity to the linearity and so on.
But where they are really very strong in Dynaudio is that after the famous transducer builds upon the range Esotec (directly from BEYOND ESOTAR technology team that the models most high-end has several tens of thousands of euros the enclosure!)) they use both for their hi-fi speakers (Dynaudio) in their range monitors (Dynaudio Acoustics), and while the performances are pretty much the same, prices are doubled for monitors (ca qd is expensive even just for that y'ait marked "acoustics" and more
Of course I'm talking about passive speakers, not models of assets (the price of the amp increasing the overall price of the enclosure, normal).
To illustrate my point about the use of hi-fi speakers in the studio I invite you to take a look at the different sites of major studio and see how systems use Dynaudio (Audience and Contour) in proximity monitoring cot Auratone of other B & W for both the mix, mastering the Postprod, and see how the studios, unwanted systems TAD (manufacturer of hi-fi speakers very high end) in main monitor (see (Electric Lady Studio, Studio Mega, etc.).
- In short I will not dwell long tirade but all this has only one goal, put a few things and try to silence some beliefs such as "monitor or stereo?" or it's better to say "good sound or bad sound?" And do not kid, a good speaker is expensive, so we are not saying that a pair of TRUTH B2031 is better than a pair of Dynaudio Audience or contour is seen that labeled monitor top ....