Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Oktava MK-319 reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Oktava MK-319
Images
1/143
Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
Bernard Ancèze Bernard Ancèze
Published on 01/24/08 at 07:30
See the reviews previous ones.
Russian Construction is bizarre, but is. The connectors are not terrible. no bote or soft suspension.

OVERALL OPINION

5 months. In the studio, I'm not excited about this microphone. It may be useful for work LGERS models of voice, piano, or a couple stro example. To isolate some of rsonances serious and the counsel of Plastok2, I put the microphone in a room air bike - engine and it works, it's much cleaner. It's the Oktava, soft, not too much clicking, clean, but not characters. It goes well on many instruments, but blah, no major or class. The voice, it is usually lack a little finesse and intelligibility of flesh. Ds that the mix is ​​complicated a little softness is lost and there is a poor man's lack of prsence. on the other hand I used to scne with a vocal ensemble, 2 Oktava 319 and an AKG C414 BXLII. Easy to work, clean, no mush in the grave. Its default, the bass should be cut drastically imprcis, lack of prsence of mdium, and treble a bit volatile but not aggressive scne render service. I got enough aisment trs natural sound and allows great freedom of movement artists. The C414 with 5 directional filters and is much more practical course, but the Oktava is not bad. It is not expensive. I have two, I do not take a troisime.