All user reviews for the The T.bone SCT700

Large diaphragm condenser microphone lamp.
Cardioid.
Comes in a luxurious and sturdy metal case (that is well protected, it's been reassuring and pro)
Micro comes with all accessories: suspension effective windscreen, power supply unit, cable 7-pin 10 meter ... faut.Il everything that's missing is the XLR cable and anti-pop.

Edit: I take off one point because the lamp is welded, not clipped, very stupid, even for low-end Chinese ...

OVERALL OPINION

It's been a month since I use it.
For now, I have used with voice (especially mine). I have to do more tests.

What I can say for now is that the sound is pretty amazing (at attractive price that I paid compared to what it is).
Coupled with the Mindprint TRIO, it delivers a precise, clear, warm, rather open and balanced, neutral, which enhances the voice without actually coloring or turn by providing "some sort of grain" when is placed at a safe distance from the microphone to take: At least 25/30 cm.
Below, There are a proximity effect, that is to say a reinforcement in the bass and midrange, which can be interesting if it is used I guess (but I have not yet done enough testing to say anything).

Otherwise, I could not see which model of lamp is, but it is not a 12AX7 I think.
Anyway, I have no problem souffle.Un very good signal / noise ratio so.

Defects in the ... especially considering the price ... not much.
Serious, even if they are well defined and precise, this too can be, but it is more or less control by positioning relatively far.
Treble, if they are not aggressive (hissing problem ...), deserve to win yet defined, even if they are well.
Finally, the sound can be slightly warped, but it's very minimal.

Compared to Rodes, Studio Project, Behringer in this price range and above ... SCT700 on the outclass everyone and it costs less too.

Case to be continued ...
At least for 159 euros, you have a high quality microphone, but not irresistible and pretty effective (sound)

Edit 23/03/07: I sold it because I have the opportunity to equip myself of SCT2000 (at multidirectivité) ps and I can not help me keep this one, which would be redundant.
Otherwise, know also that this model, the lamp is sealed, and given the fragility of the PCB, it is very difficult to change it without going into details.
Personally, I gave up.

As you know, it's a micro studio lamp. Essenteillement for taking singing. Why not instruents type guitar ... Omnidirectional

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for a month.
I am posting this notice because I have to say I'm bluffing! Recall that the friend has the same price as the behringer B1, which sounds pretty good (this one I use until now). Well it has nothing to do: much fuller, much warmer, much more now. Simply amazing at the value!
FYI: I'm recording in home studio and I have a friend who meuilleurs results recorded in a studio with a Neumann pro! (I do not sell, he said quil ... He listened to me and say, with all the subjectivity that I can make the result of T-Bone is really close to the Neumann ... € 3000!)

Warning! the microphone is not perfect: No low cut! So many "Pheu" midrange and bass (which tend to saturate if one is too close to the mic. At the same time it is the job of the lamp: warm sound lol). This suggests to reduce your serious input table or Cuter below 100Hz to the mix. (Yes, I know I tell it a bit technical, I learned what a low-cut this morning: D)
Also, leave a light heat 2 hours to a good result ... But it's worth the wait!
Anyway, I think it's a value for money out of the ordinary. I hope that will hold the microphone distance and time. As a rule, small price to pay in terms of strength and endurance apparaeils.

Micro singing lamp, sisi there really I disassemble made by a pro because I had a short juice.
I use it even in the overhead drum (above and in front APRS I double).

I also dpann a friend who made the theater and recorded voices, piano, percussion, great sound. for voice speak, it is exceptional carrment prsence and heat. TB also sche guitar.
not suitable for absolutely against times for guitar amp (prffer a 57 or 58 SM which you remove the capsule)

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for a little over a year.
the sound is quite warm, bright, and I think he sounds a bit dull when even so I drop the bass and treble up a little
but it's a real micro registration, stunning for the price
I made dj enrefistrements in studios with microphones much more expensive and there is no shame ben

I would do without this choice hsiter

attention to the Power Box not go wrong: the choice between 110 and 220, and verifies before connecting to light.

IDAL not ruinous to the models that can be refined once the same

good, it is best to make you listen to what I do for my group:
SM 58 GC and CC
T BONE for OH
Fender precision Bass US sr live well in the map (Firepod)
Start with a 58 in front of the amp

www.myspace.com / myindeed (2 songs: SPA and registered with BASTILLE NATION)

Tube microphone.
I use it mainly for vocals and guitar folk in homestudio.
For voice, no complaints, very clean, warm, and quite right (or objective).
Not recommended for a guitar amp, I tried and it is not very suitable, it "flattened" a little sound.
Sure, it's quite a low cut at the entrance, especially for local plops voice, but it's actually quite normal.

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?
I use it for 6 months.
- What is so special that you like most and least?
I love the quality / price ratio, of course, its sound, but also very handy suitcase with all accessories included.
But its price may be a cache lifetime limited!

In conclusion, I would do without hesitation that choice, because for the price and quality it's worth, I think it has very little to envy to the most expensive. I have a home studio, and it's great to get gear by hand, but also to work more "professionally". In a sound recording, there are 10,000 factors to consider before you go after his stuff.
Do not hesitate.

Micro exclusively for making singing sound studio pro. Singing - Men / Women / chorus etc ....
Can not understand how the mic can be compared to the greatest worth a fortune .... Yes, it is cheap, so we say that it is light .... But the lamp is so yucky that it does more harm than good.
When I first made I thought it was Pete and I had to return to the supplier ... I tried several singers, some famous .... I then change the amp EQ, compressor, etc. .... deeseur Yuck ..... drooling and it's not cool to sing in the studio deddans as the singer realizes immediately that it is not clean ..... let alone mixer or arrange ............ ...........

OVERALL OPINION

Used once in two days non-stop test
greatest flaw: everything except the look .... Its practical and solid box
The value for money is correct because it is cheap, provided that it is for a beginner who wants to make some models for bar or pub and cabaret show basta.

Studio condenser microphone is a lamp in T. Bone SCT = Studio Condenser Tube

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for two weeks, it comes in mtalique briefcase with Power + cable, cable 5-pin XLR SPECIFICATIONS (10 meters), the spider suspension and microphone. The unit is robust trs, the microphone is a good size and trs heavy. At first it was worth the money. Then come the tests and trials, the beginners I used the following config Presonus Firestudio Project and Cubase, no micro amp. Your exact own no more, I have almost everything back because at Thomann TRS little diffrence with my old SC400 j'tais trsdu 50 Euros. Then I tried it on my old config, Art Tube MP Amp, religious table yam, Emu 0404 sound card and sonar squenseur. And it is not the same thing with an amplification (lamp + table) returns the microphone in dtails voice, it just remains neutral by providing heat lamps, and no not to drool a bit contrary to what some say is trs own. This is a microphone made in China, so the problem remains a quality trs unstable, it is probably the cause of dissatisfaction, they fall into bad duent MODELS. Mine is good at low rev, correct the mids and highs, it does not dnature. Strength, without saturating it cash, I also like his cot asse directional finally, that the chopper quickly frquences lies environmental control. I adopt it, but watch this micro really need to be supported by one or amplifications to rveler. But to compare a del Neumann, EXAGRES should not either. I think it can compete with micro light or no less than 300 euros and it is not so bad dj. Remains if the quality holds up over 5 years, will be perfect.
I tried other pickups: Rodhe NT1 (bof) Eagletone CM90 (bof), SCT in 2000 (very good but more expensive) AKG C3000B (without proper) 2200 SE (trs bof) , APEX 460 (I almost buy that, I just have a bit of remorse), Neumann TLM 103 (good but expensive)
Less than 150 Euros all is carrment excellent.

singing, making his violin, acoustic guitar
Everything has been said about the technical characteristics but Me, the Power Box, I think it's super heavy ( https://www.zikinf.com/forums )

( https://www.zikinf.com/forums )

OVERALL OPINION

for 1 year
I have a Neumann U87ai, Prodipe STC GrooveTube a prodipe Ribon
I read the above flattering comparison between e Tbone and U87,
it's a joke ?????
- Or he must change Neumann (it's down to a number of times)
- Is it necessary to change preamp,
- Or he must change EARS <img class="smiley" src="/images/audiofanzine/interface/smileys/icon_mrgreen.gif" alt="mrgreen" />
we will not discuss prices for 2300 Euros 150 course is not the game <img class="smiley" src="/images/audiofanzine/interface/smileys/icon_wink.gif" alt="wink" />
Tbone is the super pinched in the midrange, not very accurate in the acute and absent in the lower
good, mixes it in time for their money, so I will stop breaking.
Biz