Log in
Log in

or

Thread A mastering checklist?

  • 8 replies
  • 6 participants
  • 2,073 views
  • 6 followers
cool cat

cool cat

5 posts
New AFfiliate
First post
1 Posted on 10/15/2014 at 02:49:46
I'm still somewhat of a mastering newbie and was wondering if those of you with mastering experience tend to follow a checklist before fine-tuning anything? I.e. a workflow to help you master efficiently?

What I usually do is run the track through a sonic maximizer. Then, after ensuring there's no clipping, i send to the next plugin: Ozone. There I largely use EQ, reveb (sometimes) and the exciters and rarely use stereo widening (if I need to, it usually signifies problems to address within the original mix). Then I send this output to the sonnox limiter (far and away my favorite limiter).

After that, I'll check over everything in harbal to help give an idea of what needs to be EQ'd. Then I test my work on different speakers and mediums.

What do you guys do? Am I missing something? Would you change anything around?
angelie

angelie

350 posts
AFfluent Poster
2 Posted on 10/15/2014 at 03:15:57
Maximize or normalize is something i don't use and don't like others to do neighter.
You need enough headroom for mastering.
I personally like a headroom of -3.

Same for limmiting. You are cutting of transients and this will lead to problems while compressing when mastering.

It's not about what you got to use ....    but how you use what you got...

[ Post last edited on 10/15/2014 at 05:02:32 ]

hardknockstudios

hardknockstudios

5 posts
New AFfiliate
3 Posted on 10/15/2014 at 05:08:09
I go with a less is more approach. The headroom is a given for any quality mastering to be done, but in general, I compress, do just a bit of stereo widening, EQ, then send to my limiter.

Mastering is like cooking, there is no single recipe to make a great (or disgusting) meal. Rather, several ways to get to unique conclusions. Just gotta find your own recipe ;)
angelie

angelie

350 posts
AFfluent Poster
4 Posted on 10/15/2014 at 06:58:14
Well if the mixbowl is full it is full icon_facepalm.gif
You will not believe how many people deliver a mix to master with only -1 or -0.5 db left to mix...

But it is so true that their are only guidelines.
Every mix has its own mastering approach.

It's not about what you got to use ....    but how you use what you got...

hardknockstudios

hardknockstudios

5 posts
New AFfiliate
5 Posted on 10/15/2014 at 07:20:57
Quote from angelie:
You will not believe how many people deliver a mix to master with only -1 or -0.5 db left to mix...


Those are the assholes that don't have a clue and don't want to learn about mastering, so they put together some filthy track and send it over to us to do the hard work. DAWs should have limiters incorporated where any decisions that can adversely effect sound quality or headroom lead to a gigantic popup that says 'don't do this if you want to master this track later'
Mike Levine

Mike Levine

1065 posts
Author
6 Posted on 10/15/2014 at 09:25:43
Quote:
Those are the assholes that don't have a clue and don't want to learn about mastering, so they put together some filthy track and send it over to us to do the hard work.

I sympathize, but perhaps you're being a little rough on the people submitting tracks. I wouldn't assume that they don't want to know about mastering, but rather that they simply don't understand the need to leave the mastering engineer room to maneuver. My advice, if you're going to be mastering and are worried that clients will send overly hot mixes, is to tell them in advance that you need mixes without any master-bus limiting or master-bus compression. If they've already finished their mix and made it too hot, ask them to recall it, take those effects off, and run the mix again.
New Loops

New Loops

3 posts
New AFfiliate
7 Posted on 10/24/2015 at 12:15:45
someone asked me to make the mix "warmer bright". lol :oo:

Big discounts on pro audio loops and sample packs at NewLoops.com

XRS

XRS

1 post
New AFfiliate
8 Posted on 01/01/2016 at 17:29:13
Another good practice when mastering is using a multimeter. The RMS during most of the song should hit at -20 up to -10. I usually master -15/-16 allowing more space creating a more dynamic sound. Obviously, the peak should never go over 0 to avoid digital distortion.

When compressing it's not recommended to use a ratio over 3:1.

[ Post last edited on 01/01/2016 at 17:35:42 ]

Mike Levine

Mike Levine

1065 posts
Author
9 Posted on 01/04/2016 at 05:22:27
Quote:
When compressing it's not recommended to use a ratio over 3:1.

Good advice. One should also be careful about setting too low a threshold, as that governs the amount of compression, as well. You can really hear it when a song you're mastering is over-compressed. The transients lose their snap and there's an artificial quality to the audio that's not at all pleasing to the ear. At that point, you have to dial it back.
cookies
We are using cookies!

Yes, Audiofanzine is using cookies. Since the last thing that we want is disturbing your diet with too much fat or too much sugar, you'll be glad to learn that we made them ourselves with fresh, organic and fair ingredients, and with a perfect nutritional balance. What this means is that the data we store in them is used to enhance your use of our website as well as improve your user experience on our pages and show you personalised ads (learn more). To configure your cookie preferences, click here.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent
These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine and allow its optimization. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Example: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).
Google Analytics
We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it.
Advertising
This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest. We are likely to display advertisements from our own platform, from Google Advertising Products or from Adform.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent

These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Examples: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).

Google Analytics

We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it. When this parameter is activated, no personal information is sent to Google and the IP addresses are anonymized.

Advertising

This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest. We are likely to display advertisements from our own platform, from Google Advertising Products or from Adform.


You can find more details on data protection in our privacy policy.
You can also find information about how Google uses personal data by following this link.