Log in
Log in

or

Thread Studio Projects B1 - Rode NT1 etc opinions please!

  • 4 replies
  • 5 participants
  • 4,055 views
  • 0 follower
dlo

dlo

2 posts
New AFfiliate
First post
1 Posted on 07/15/2004 at 04:33:21
Hi

I used to own a Rode NT1 to record vocals through a JoeMeek VC3 into a fostex FD8 with Lexicon effects...it all had to be sold a long time ago... now i am down to a PC with a Tascam US122 and want to buy a decent mic again. I was considering the Rode again because it was perfect for my needs and i already know that mic but i have noticed some budget mics that may compare well, save money, and tide me over until i save the extra for the Rode...

How does the Studio Projects B1 compare on male vocals?? Or any other cheaper condenser mic for that matter.

Apologies if it's a bit of an open question but your thoughts are appreciated.,

8)
REDStudios

REDStudios

5 posts
New AFfiliate
2 Posted on 08/11/2004 at 15:55:03
akg c3000b is a good mic, a friend of mine, however, uses the rode nt1 in recording acoustic guitars and likes it better (for acoustic gtr) than some of his $1000 mics (blueberry etc) of course he uses more than 1 mic to get the perfect sound but the rode nt1 is usually used in the setup.. i have the akg.. good mic, workhorse, as they say, i suggest the akg, good company etc.. but my ears still have years to go before developing a distinct taste for the sounds of the different mics
elamberth

elamberth

15 posts
New AFfiliate
3 Posted on 10/29/2004 at 04:53:56
I'm not sure if this will help, but I currently use a Studio Projects B1 quite a bit for vocals, guitar cab mic'ing (stopped using the SM57), and acoustic guitar. I can't compare to the Rode, but I am very pleased with the B1. I'll use it with the Joe Meek VC3, or for a little cleaner sound, to a studio projects VTB1, which I think is a good consideration if you are looking for a mic pre in that price range. Hope this helped.
probedms

probedms

4 posts
New AFfiliate
4 Posted on 12/02/2004 at 19:25:30
i just got a b1, ive been using the 414 tl2 for years, the b1 compared to that is brighter and more susceptible to air hitting the mic and killing the b's and p's. you need a ver good wind guard with this mic. i think the jomeek with this mic would be ill. the 100 b1 sounds dope just a little bright and you may need to scoop out some mid lows to get it to sound natural. b1 dope mic
sta-koen

sta-koen

2 posts
New AFfiliate
5 Posted on 07/06/2005 at 02:30:55
You might want to check this out:

http://www.studioprojects.com/pdf/SOS_B1.pdf

It is a review bij Sound On Sound on the Studio Projects B1. Might be helpful.
cookies
We are using cookies!

Yes, Audiofanzine is using cookies. Since the last thing that we want is disturbing your diet with too much fat or too much sugar, you'll be glad to learn that we made them ourselves with fresh, organic and fair ingredients, and with a perfect nutritional balance. What this means is that the data we store in them is used to enhance your use of our website as well as improve your user experience on our pages and show you personalised ads (learn more). To configure your cookie preferences, click here.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent
These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine and allow its optimization. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Example: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).
Google Analytics
We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it.
Advertising
This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest. We are likely to display advertisements from our own platform, from Google Advertising Products or from Adform.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent

These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Examples: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).

Google Analytics

We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it. When this parameter is activated, no personal information is sent to Google and the IP addresses are anonymized.

Advertising

This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest. We are likely to display advertisements from our own platform, from Google Advertising Products or from Adform.


You can find more details on data protection in our privacy policy.
You can also find information about how Google uses personal data by following this link.