View other reviews for this product:
Wozzeck
Published on 07/12/09 at 10:51
The installation is done it without problems?
Very easy installation, updates and even more (which is far from always the case)
on the other hand, as always, the inevitable event of the permit on-line m'insupporte (thus failing grade).
I do not accept that forces me to connect to allow me to use a product I bought,
I think it's illegal (although they are almost all that's not why it's good).
The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
The manual is incomplete because (unless I am mistaken), they do not
need X-Gear (free download) to assign "exchange controls".
In addition, they explain how to assign "automation" without explaining how to use them later.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
What is the configuration of your computer? (Motherboard / CPU / Ram / Disk / sound card ..)
PC Core2 (2x3Ghz), 4GB Ram, Sound card RME Multiface, Windows XP sp3
The software works he correctly on this configuration?
yes, no problem, but it's greedy, Amplitube before I could adjust my sound card on 0.7 m (with large as VST
East West Symphonic Orchestra for example), since Amplitube Fender, I have to turn 3ms, and the CPU is
to 2 / 3 (Cubase SX3), if I drop below 3 ms, I get cracking.
OVERALL OPINION
I use Amplitube Fender only with keyboards (Rhodes, Clavinet VST), and frankly (apart from consumption
CPU), it works very well.
Directly, it warms the sound, gives a new light, giving it a grain, a presence, making it aggressive or as needed
with one of his Clavinet, we can make dozens of very different, like the Rhodes;
However, we must tweak a lot (because it is primarily for players), but it's nice to handle,
the result is direct and shape the sound to suit the mood, groove, of the need.
Before I use a lot of the virtual guitar amp in wave (very low fuel consumption and also next to Amplitube)
but it seems to reach its desired faster with Amplitube, and I find it much more
pleasant to handle (and look).
What is so special that you like most and least?
I particularly like:
-When I get tired of her (we never tire of it long ago), I change my amp and boom, it's horizons, a desire
to play different ...
- Version 1.1, the new pedal wha seems better suited to my clavinet sounds (Plugsound, native instr).
-Interface with clear line of sound through the microphone button (the atmosphere).
I like least:
-The automation badly explained, the assignment of "exchange controls" very very very limited.
Support-who had claimed before buying Amplitube Receptor turned on, and of course, is not the case
With experience, you do again this choice? ...
Yes, although I originally bought this app for my Receptor and once again, its not working,
it's a very nice program, very close to the player, I do not regret at all
Very easy installation, updates and even more (which is far from always the case)
on the other hand, as always, the inevitable event of the permit on-line m'insupporte (thus failing grade).
I do not accept that forces me to connect to allow me to use a product I bought,
I think it's illegal (although they are almost all that's not why it's good).
The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
The manual is incomplete because (unless I am mistaken), they do not
need X-Gear (free download) to assign "exchange controls".
In addition, they explain how to assign "automation" without explaining how to use them later.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
What is the configuration of your computer? (Motherboard / CPU / Ram / Disk / sound card ..)
PC Core2 (2x3Ghz), 4GB Ram, Sound card RME Multiface, Windows XP sp3
The software works he correctly on this configuration?
yes, no problem, but it's greedy, Amplitube before I could adjust my sound card on 0.7 m (with large as VST
East West Symphonic Orchestra for example), since Amplitube Fender, I have to turn 3ms, and the CPU is
to 2 / 3 (Cubase SX3), if I drop below 3 ms, I get cracking.
OVERALL OPINION
I use Amplitube Fender only with keyboards (Rhodes, Clavinet VST), and frankly (apart from consumption
CPU), it works very well.
Directly, it warms the sound, gives a new light, giving it a grain, a presence, making it aggressive or as needed
with one of his Clavinet, we can make dozens of very different, like the Rhodes;
However, we must tweak a lot (because it is primarily for players), but it's nice to handle,
the result is direct and shape the sound to suit the mood, groove, of the need.
Before I use a lot of the virtual guitar amp in wave (very low fuel consumption and also next to Amplitube)
but it seems to reach its desired faster with Amplitube, and I find it much more
pleasant to handle (and look).
What is so special that you like most and least?
I particularly like:
-When I get tired of her (we never tire of it long ago), I change my amp and boom, it's horizons, a desire
to play different ...
- Version 1.1, the new pedal wha seems better suited to my clavinet sounds (Plugsound, native instr).
-Interface with clear line of sound through the microphone button (the atmosphere).
I like least:
-The automation badly explained, the assignment of "exchange controls" very very very limited.
Support-who had claimed before buying Amplitube Receptor turned on, and of course, is not the case
With experience, you do again this choice? ...
Yes, although I originally bought this app for my Receptor and once again, its not working,
it's a very nice program, very close to the player, I do not regret at all