krisan
Note : 8 sur 10
« A MUST! »
Published on 01/31/12 at 03:44Hi all.
I own one for my H4n taken from his outdoors. My regret was the lack of protection of embedded microphones (I am including journalism), and I found that the protective housing was impractical.
Then came the H2n!
A marvel (with certain reservations)
The audio-in is impeccable (breathtaking, no pun intended).
The audio-out (speaker), however, is limited, provided that either require (as is my case).
Perfect ergonomics for Journalism (up to place it on a table without accessories and record four tracks - only. Wav).
Settings and trigger / stop recording at the top.
The accessory kit is in my opinion essential. The silicone cover dedicated on the other hand, is not practical and I recommend the purchase (I immediately removed after test).
That's it. If not what else to say it does not duplicate the H4n, which is superior in features, but is a bit fragile (in case of journalism) from the H 2 N (micro).
When I compare to my old Sony MX20 (indeed, much older): there is no photo.
Very good material for an affordable price for the one that makes the mobile audio, and wants quality and ergonomics.
A small spot of shade, however: its brilliant shell tends to scratch easily. But after all, what, compared to the performace of this product unique?
I own one for my H4n taken from his outdoors. My regret was the lack of protection of embedded microphones (I am including journalism), and I found that the protective housing was impractical.
Then came the H2n!
A marvel (with certain reservations)
The audio-in is impeccable (breathtaking, no pun intended).
The audio-out (speaker), however, is limited, provided that either require (as is my case).
Perfect ergonomics for Journalism (up to place it on a table without accessories and record four tracks - only. Wav).
Settings and trigger / stop recording at the top.
The accessory kit is in my opinion essential. The silicone cover dedicated on the other hand, is not practical and I recommend the purchase (I immediately removed after test).
That's it. If not what else to say it does not duplicate the H4n, which is superior in features, but is a bit fragile (in case of journalism) from the H 2 N (micro).
When I compare to my old Sony MX20 (indeed, much older): there is no photo.
Very good material for an affordable price for the one that makes the mobile audio, and wants quality and ergonomics.
A small spot of shade, however: its brilliant shell tends to scratch easily. But after all, what, compared to the performace of this product unique?