Become a member
Become a member

or
Continue with Google
Log in
Log in

or
Log in using a Google account

Thread new track advice needed

  • 6 replies
  • 2 participants
  • 1,257 views
  • 0 follower
nihility0000

nihility0000

99 posts
AFfable Poster
First post
1 Posted on 03/17/2004 at 17:34:52
i have a new track that a guitarist and i recorded. i would give great thanks for feedback on the mixing. we didnt have a drummer so i had to pull off a drum track with all of my 2 months experience playing drums so bear with it (its not that bad). i guess you could call it jazz fusion. have a listen if you please. we dont have a name for it yet so it is appropriately named "no name yet"


http://www.soundclick.com/bands/3/nihilitymusic.htm
nihility0000

nihility0000

99 posts
AFfable Poster
2 Posted on 04/06/2004 at 17:07:30
ok so i posted this to see what kind of feedback i would get with such a horrible mix, but to my surprize no-one responded. i guess that it was just so horrible that it left everyone speechless. the song that was posted was something i did about 7 months ago. this new one i have posted is hopefully alot better. i put alot of time in this one (mastering and recording, not playing) so i would surely love to get some feedback on this one. check it out here:

http://www.soundclick.com/bands/3/nihilitymusic.htm

sorry for the last song, i wanted to see what kind of listeners we have here. but again it didnt work.

feedback please!!!
Samo

Samo

31 posts
New AFfiliate
3 Posted on 04/06/2004 at 23:05:11
Dude, check your PM's.
nihility0000

nihility0000

99 posts
AFfable Poster
4 Posted on 04/07/2004 at 10:41:02
i have none. what are you talking about?
Samo

Samo

31 posts
New AFfiliate
5 Posted on 04/07/2004 at 14:13:57
I don't know what happened... I thought I sent you a PM a few days ago, but it must not have gotten to you.
Anyway, the first file you posted wasn't so bad - rough, but workable. I liked the musical idea you were laying down, nice progressive style.
The new track is definitely of better quality. Good jam, too. However, when I load the file into Nuendo, the waveform looks almost flat-peaked. That leaves no room for dynamic range, and explains why the drums have no impact. The depth seems all wrong, too. For instance, the first few seconds feel as though the listener is in the middle of a room with guitar amps along the walls and the drums far off. The change starting at 0:09 puts the power chords closer, but the drums farther. At 0:31 the closed-hat becomes the predominant image, but the drums vanish again at 0:42 (which is also where the waveform begins to be severely maxed out). The lead guitar projects nicely here, but the bass and rhythm guitars are hard to discern. 1:21 starts the sweetest part of the mix - balanced guitars and a punch in the drums. The change at 2:05 sees the toms pulling away from the listener, while the ride cymbal is right up front (which conflicts with the "distant" crash cymbal). The big build-up at 2:29 doesn't seem to go anywhere due to the lack of available dynamic range.
EQ, imaging, and balance are the main issues here. Did you record to multiple tracks, or to a two-track stereo mix? If you have multi-track files, I would love the opportunity to work on them for you. If not, perhaps I could fiddle with the mp3 file and send it back to you. Keep in touch.
Samo.
nihility0000

nihility0000

99 posts
AFfable Poster
6 Posted on 04/07/2004 at 20:06:28
good god man, you really listened didnt you. that is the best detailed response i have gotten yet.
yeah i know what you are talking about with the maxed out levels. i ahve been getting complaints about my stuff being to low in volume so i compressed the hell out of it and used the L2 limiter from waves on it and peaked it about 0.0 and set the threshold about -4.5. i acomplished what i was after but in the process i killed the dynamics.
the drums were rocorded on 4 tracks:
1 over head miced with an AT4040
1 tom track miced with the shure pg series mics
1 snare track miced with an SM57
1 bass drum track with a PG 52 (shure)

i did an a/b comparison with some nirvana songs off nevermind. i like the tonality and levels of the songs. but also understand that this was only my 5th time really trying to mix and master anything. i used the diamond bundle from waves to do all my processing but i have not become familiar with them yet. i would love for you to work with the tracks but because of lack of processing power i had to multiband compress and limit every track then render it and open in a new project. that could be where i lost all of my dynamics. so the tracks will have already been compressed and limited, but i did leave quite a bit of head room on each track. get back to me if you still wish to help me out and we will find some way of sending these 12 files back and forth. if you have AIM i could zip it and send it to you that way. anyways thanks so much for your feedback.
later.
Samo

Samo

31 posts
New AFfiliate
7 Posted on 04/08/2004 at 08:33:34
Notice my shiny new AIM button? I just signed up this morning. I'm stuck on dial-up for now, so I do not stay connected full-time, but I'm on alot.
The AIM zip idea sounds like it should work. I didn't know you could transfer files over it. Let's see what happens...
cookies
We are using cookies!

Yes, Audiofanzine is using cookies. Since the last thing that we want is disturbing your diet with too much fat or too much sugar, you'll be glad to learn that we made them ourselves with fresh, organic and fair ingredients, and with a perfect nutritional balance. What this means is that the data we store in them is used to enhance your use of our website as well as improve your user experience on our pages (learn more). To configure your cookie preferences, click here.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent
These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine and allow its optimization. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Example: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).
Google Analytics
We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it.
Advertising
This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent

These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Examples: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).

Google Analytics

We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it. When this parameter is activated, no personal information is sent to Google and the IP addresses are anonymized.

Advertising

This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest.


You can find more details on data protection in our privacy policy.
You can also find information about how Google uses personal data by following this link.