Log in
Log in

or

Thread Attn. DJ's - Which is better DAT or CD ???

  • 5 replies
  • 4 participants
  • 1,191 views
  • 0 follower
bobbymacbean

bobbymacbean

2 posts
New AFfiliate
First post
1 Posted on 07/12/2005 at 18:41:19
i'm looking into buying a portable DAT recorder but have come across the marantz portable CD recorder and i'm wondering which way to go.

on one hand i can get longer sessions on the DAT but recording right to a CD would save me having to burn the DAT to CD later on.

are there any quality distinctions between the two that might have me leaning more to one or the other ?

i should emphasize PORTABLE and also would appreciate recommendations for particular recorders and there pros/cons.

thanks for any input,
brian
pcs800

pcs800

22 posts
New AFfiliate
2 Posted on 07/13/2005 at 06:41:44
I am not sure about either of those, but since nobody else has replied, I thought I'd give my opinion. We use a laptop with a USB hard drive to dj with. 320kb.s mp3 files sound as good as any other solution.
Don't know if that helps but thought I'd try.
bobbymacbean

bobbymacbean

2 posts
New AFfiliate
3 Posted on 07/13/2005 at 14:23:01
LOL!!! - thanks for the reply. i'm just considering going from conventional taping to dat or cd and you suggest i jump straight to the laptop. that's a bit of a technology leap for me. i'm just an old fart who isn't quite ready to give up my turntables just yet. i also use cd decks but jumping to just a laptop is too much for me. when you play from a laptop, do you still use the mixer or do you use mixing software in the computer ? see, ........completely in the dark. ( ;> i'm just more into a more organic experience i guess. thanks anyway
pcs800

pcs800

22 posts
New AFfiliate
4 Posted on 07/13/2005 at 15:42:47
We have a small PA system for DJ-ing with an 8 channel mixing board. You simply use a cord to plug the line out of the laptop to two channels on the board. (stereo). You can then use the same eq or whatever else you used before. The laptop simply plays the music file.
If you are techy enough to find and post on this forum, you can do the laptop dj thing.
free software for playing mp3 file:
www.winamp.com
Or T-Player at https://tinyurl.com/bnxm4
It is a great free dj software application.
We currently have over 20,000 songs stored on the laptop external hard drive.
Guess how much that would weigh in cd's?
If you need to know exactly what to get (assuming you are interested), let me know.
KitC

KitC

243 posts
AFfinity Poster
5 Posted on 07/13/2005 at 20:26:26
Brian,

You have to weigh the pros and cons of both formats. Off the top of my head, these are some I could think of:

DAT

pros - 48/44.1 Khz 16/24-bit recording (depending on model), extended recording times, there are portable players/recorders out there, track naming functions on most recorders. Depending on how it's stored, your data should last forever (as long as you store the DAT player/recorder with it too).

cons - medium should be stored in temperature/humidity controlled environment to prevent fungus/mildew, exposure to strong magnetic fields could destroy data, data stored in linear fashion - fast forward or rewind does take time, try auditioning your DAT mixes in your car stereo. Depending to locale, recording media may be hard to find. Limited primarily to audio recording only.

CD/CDR

pros - readily available recording media, non-linear data access - could easily access next track within seconds, up to 74 mins recording time, could readily play in your car stereo, you could store almost any form of data on a cdr.

cons - exposure to strong sunlight/UV radiation COULD render data unreadable (though I've personally never been able to prove it), 74 mins recording time max., some older cd players do not accept track-at-once (TAO) recordings - usually disc-at-once (DAO) burns are more acceptable,

As a sidestep to the 74 min recording issue, DVD recordable media can store up to 4.7 gigabytes of data. That's equivalent to 7.2 cdr's or almost 9 hours of audio. Other portable options are mp3 players that support line-in recording; there are examples from iRiver, Archos and Creative. I checked if the iPod supported line-in recording but although the firmware supports it, it seems to require a software hack.

Best,

Kit
LooneyTunes

LooneyTunes

30 posts
New AFfiliate
6 Posted on 07/13/2005 at 20:23:56

%1$s a écrit LOL!!! - thanks for the reply. i'm just considering going from conventional taping to dat or cd and you suggest i jump straight to the laptop. that's a bit of a technology leap for me. i'm just an old fart who isn't quite ready to give up my turntables just yet.


I use a portable rack with a PreSonus MP20 Stereo Mic Preamp/Mixer and a Tascam direct to CD deck. Alternatively, you could use a pair of Focusrite Mic/Compressor strips and a Tascam deck. The Tascam deck is dead on reliable over months of use. A more complicated approach is the battery powered KORG PXR4 which uses broadcast MP2 format. The problem with the PXR4 is that it is a mixer and requires post process bouncing to stereo and transformation from the MP2 format. Anyways, these system work.
cookies
We are using cookies!

Yes, Audiofanzine is using cookies. Since the last thing that we want is disturbing your diet with too much fat or too much sugar, you'll be glad to learn that we made them ourselves with fresh, organic and fair ingredients, and with a perfect nutritional balance. What this means is that the data we store in them is used to enhance your use of our website as well as improve your user experience on our pages and show you personalised ads (learn more). To configure your cookie preferences, click here.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent
These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine and allow its optimization. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Example: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).
Google Analytics
We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it.
Advertising
This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest. We are likely to display advertisements from our own platform, from Google Advertising Products or from Adform.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent

These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Examples: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).

Google Analytics

We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it. When this parameter is activated, no personal information is sent to Google and the IP addresses are anonymized.

Advertising

This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest. We are likely to display advertisements from our own platform, from Google Advertising Products or from Adform.


You can find more details on data protection in our privacy policy.
You can also find information about how Google uses personal data by following this link.