View other reviews for this product:
Sebounet
Published on 10/13/03 at 03:12
The 2600 MDX is a two-channel dynamics processor. In my opinion, this small miracle boi-box contains everything you need to compress or ExpanDrive a mix or sound: Section expander / gate, compressor section / limit and correction of the beep, the de-esser and peak limiter form a harmonious whole, worthy of a Swiss army knife. The connector is in front of the rear jack or XLR 6.35. In short, are all in a 1U rack trs cheap.
UTILIZATION
First default: I like Behringer, but their arrangement of keys requested to have tiny fingers! It is true that many CHARACTERISTICS fit in a 1U rack has requested a fairly extreme miniaturization.
2nd default: The manual is too light ...
Otherwise, everything is OK - I use the MDX 2600 in my home studio and I am satisfied. I never had before rack expander / gate / compressor / limiter / de-esser / limiter peak, and I do not feel lost!
If only meant well a Behringer MDX 2600 in a 2U rack ...
SOUND QUALITY
Efficient sound quality, trs satisfactory. The 2600 MDX file a potato can not be my mix! It's all good! However, it should be remembered that a compressor is not a cache-Misri: A good mix should sound good even before the transition to the compressor.
A BMOL for rglage enhancer and the "light tube": for me, these accessories are useless if the sound source is good enough, and I have some apprhensions for the management of the acute MDX. I usually do mix quite soft, and I think that the enhancer and the "tube" rajoutent treble aggressive dplaisent me.
OVERALL OPINION
For the price, it's amazing what we find today. Of course, I immediately Rasht one if mine breaks. I do not be facing a professional instrument, but a good deal effectively Swiss army knife that will delight home studios, but that did not take the road in a professional studio.
Another plus: the capacity of the MDX to handle a signal that stro plutt two mono signals.
The little less: rglages "tube" and enhancer are useless if I think it was a good mix.
UTILIZATION
First default: I like Behringer, but their arrangement of keys requested to have tiny fingers! It is true that many CHARACTERISTICS fit in a 1U rack has requested a fairly extreme miniaturization.
2nd default: The manual is too light ...
Otherwise, everything is OK - I use the MDX 2600 in my home studio and I am satisfied. I never had before rack expander / gate / compressor / limiter / de-esser / limiter peak, and I do not feel lost!
If only meant well a Behringer MDX 2600 in a 2U rack ...
SOUND QUALITY
Efficient sound quality, trs satisfactory. The 2600 MDX file a potato can not be my mix! It's all good! However, it should be remembered that a compressor is not a cache-Misri: A good mix should sound good even before the transition to the compressor.
A BMOL for rglage enhancer and the "light tube": for me, these accessories are useless if the sound source is good enough, and I have some apprhensions for the management of the acute MDX. I usually do mix quite soft, and I think that the enhancer and the "tube" rajoutent treble aggressive dplaisent me.
OVERALL OPINION
For the price, it's amazing what we find today. Of course, I immediately Rasht one if mine breaks. I do not be facing a professional instrument, but a good deal effectively Swiss army knife that will delight home studios, but that did not take the road in a professional studio.
Another plus: the capacity of the MDX to handle a signal that stro plutt two mono signals.
The little less: rglages "tube" and enhancer are useless if I think it was a good mix.