Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
Our members also liked:
Users reviews
- ebrianPublished on 03/03/10 at 09:09 (This content has been automatically translated from French)The review covers 2 Standart Telecaster USA 1986 and 1992. Non-vintage bridge. Rosewood. 21 cases.L one is black (1986) and one sunburst (1992). Alder body. Good violin.
UTILIZATION
All 2 have a handle "modern c", nothing special, it's typical telecaster with its qualities and its defects.
SOUNDS
We can play little part prs all styles of metal, but it's empty even when the instrument is a distortion intressant with metal.
However a diffrence between the 2:
The 1986: beautiful sound, his foot on a Roland Jazz Chorus with a little chorus precisely. It has everything you would expect from a tele. Dynamic and twang with this unique sound.
The 1992: dcevant. Sounds po…Read moreThe review covers 2 Standart Telecaster USA 1986 and 1992. Non-vintage bridge. Rosewood. 21 cases.L one is black (1986) and one sunburst (1992). Alder body. Good violin.
UTILIZATION
All 2 have a handle "modern c", nothing special, it's typical telecaster with its qualities and its defects.
SOUNDS
We can play little part prs all styles of metal, but it's empty even when the instrument is a distortion intressant with metal.
However a diffrence between the 2:
The 1986: beautiful sound, his foot on a Roland Jazz Chorus with a little chorus precisely. It has everything you would expect from a tele. Dynamic and twang with this unique sound.
The 1992: dcevant. Sounds poor because not enough expressive (though the pickups are original). Why? I do not know but it is true that the Fender vintages are not equal all.
OVERALL OPINION
Like what the surprises are not lacking. Particular attention as some models of the 70s/80s. Anmiques sounds and body is in 5 parts! As for the price one pays the USA logo and the term but it is less foutage of mouth than Gibson.See less00