Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Fender Super 112 reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Fender Super 112
Images
1/97
Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
h3fix h3fix
Published on 01/09/06 at 01:38
The Super 112 is an all-tube amp 60 watts.
Between two bright and one standard (really a difference of power and sound)
Two channels one clean and saturated with (hard drive ...) an equalization policy.
Two push-pull of a presence (Jore of potentiometer) and the volume of clean, pull the spush achieves an even more bright.
Standart configuration even though I still find the effects loop (which appears he has a yen)
7 for joint equalization

UTILIZATION

Nothing more simple you touch the knobs and two minutes was a huge clean sound. Active equalization (if you turn the knobs to zero you do not have sound) allows adjustment really prcis (you turn a knob and you hear the difference. The only problem is that it takes a little search to obtain a sound corresponding to the distortion common with the equalization clean. Let me explain the distortion channel does not have its own equalization was a common equalization (I stress a lot but it's boring in the beginning) which means settled that when the light was his fiddle and it goes into the distortion and the battle is all ugly ..... I mean by that is set to channel distortion and then back on the clean sound and so on until a good compromise between two channels els. Voila independently but good channels are really good.

SOUNDS

I jous mainly rock and I already have a jcm 800 so I can compare the two amp. I jou a telecaster and no messing about jcm 800 (I know what I mean) the sound is limited caraille, attention is authentic and it's roots rock n roll but c'e (ts frankly not nice. the sound of the marshall distortion ets he has my love but it's not the amp that is spoken here. From the point of view the clear / clean sound els between the two fender amps Aoccdrnig to win me it offers a greater range of its Alant sound rough and polished to a soft, fat really great in bright sonn. disto by the cons without being frankly degeulasse (as 70% of the fender) is how to say, a lot of low !!!!!! Hh indeed it is really good and fill filled with hormones, ca drool STRID but it was a style that I like my These and edge ( telecaster what ...) So I prefer that of the marshall but again it was really a matter of style. auytant On adding more than a foot of equalization was simultaneously activated the channel distortion is quite controllable but I REQUESTS branch of the amp directly to the guitar and footswitch. a foot auxiliary distortion is therefore seen with a small pedal of equalization plus it was deadly ... I put 10 becaufe be no messing around I got a 500 euro ca overwritten or a classic 50 classic 30 that costs the same price to see OCCAZ (I speak for classqiue 50)

OVERALL OPINION

I am quite happy with this amp. I got a 500 euros OCCAZ with new lamps and a new state and sincerely I would do everything els day that choice. It gives me a really cool alternative to marshall and they complettent perfectly (I will soon try to plug in stereo Nothing working) I try to nombrteux rivera amp from 32 to 50 peavey classic. It is and I repeat TOUSDES GOOD AMPS! It is only a matter of taste. But the fender ets parafaitement be very smooth in my style (rock) I've seen friends and jazz blues funkyman jous over they were very happy that explains its great Polivalente good and then when it was due the same feneder . To test urgently if you find one yet.