nicolasjag
Published on 04/07/08 at 12:26
40 watt combo amp lamps, tweed covering, vintage wish, just for aesthetics, I'm in love dja!
40 watts is not much you say? I was a performer 1000 (100 watts transistor) and this one in terms of volume the itch for it.
Moreover, for heat lamps without dcoller your neighbor's bed, possibility to add a volume box in the effects loop, which will replace the lack of a "post gain".
UTILIZATION
The config can be simpler, with a volume (the light), a drive, trebble, middle and bass, and reverb prsence.
Too bad there's no headphone jack, post gain (or even the knob for the volume of the CONTRL effects loop).
SOUNDS
The sound is terrible! For clean sounds, crystal clear sound that blends well with my scratch trs (a Fat Start us), the drive is trslger, do not expect a Marshall drive type! However, the amp cash pedals extremely well (for my part, I have a maxon od 9 and a big muff).
It's a typical fender trs, some even in the prfrent twin!
Extra.
OVERALL OPINION
Gnial end to end, the amp that made me RVer, and although I'm not.
40 watts is not much you say? I was a performer 1000 (100 watts transistor) and this one in terms of volume the itch for it.
Moreover, for heat lamps without dcoller your neighbor's bed, possibility to add a volume box in the effects loop, which will replace the lack of a "post gain".
UTILIZATION
The config can be simpler, with a volume (the light), a drive, trebble, middle and bass, and reverb prsence.
Too bad there's no headphone jack, post gain (or even the knob for the volume of the CONTRL effects loop).
SOUNDS
The sound is terrible! For clean sounds, crystal clear sound that blends well with my scratch trs (a Fat Start us), the drive is trslger, do not expect a Marshall drive type! However, the amp cash pedals extremely well (for my part, I have a maxon od 9 and a big muff).
It's a typical fender trs, some even in the prfrent twin!
Extra.
OVERALL OPINION
Gnial end to end, the amp that made me RVer, and although I'm not.