![Marshall 4100 JCM900 Dual Reverb [1990-1999] [2003 - ? ]](https://img.audiofanzine.com/img/product/normal/1/4/1409.jpg?fm=pjpg&w=300&h=218&fit=max&s=9462e899aea0d128602886d0f3e2c51c)
View other reviews for this product:
RaphRaymond
Published on 04/26/07 at 14:05
All-tube head 100Watt, 2 channel, reverb, loop.
UTILIZATION
Super mega simple, level and gain indépandant EQ per channel and common. It is therefore a homogeneous amp EQ does not interfere too common.
Marshall is the caricature as can be, no matter the position of the knobs for EQ, there's always the same, so 2 = 2-channel sound. The clean has a good gain margin before saturation is quite nice.
SOUNDS
Wow I'm not destester Marshall, this one I like it. The clean is worthy of a good transistor, I think I have the same on my AVT. There is no depth and little momentum, very little extent, the sound seems very tighten, narrow. However I tested it on an 4x12 ".
For saturation, I played the AC / DC and a little Led Zep ... But nothing else (though I do not lack influence and reference) I was hyper blocked. The sound is distinctive and highly inflexible, you must love the amp as the spit, but then I found it particularly dirty, rough ... And always flat and narrow, as if I was playing on a small amp while it is supposed to send the wood ... I had the same presence / power projection and the same with my AVT100 Bof bof ... everything.
OVERALL OPINION
According to the forums There is the JCM800 and JCM2000 worth every penny in Marshall, I am at least agree that the JCM900 is below the JCM2000. I've never played on a 800, but I do not miss it.
Well, this amp has disappointed me, the same day I played a JCM2000 TSL122, a C50, a Hot Rod, an AC-30 and F30 and I all found above the JCM900. You really liked, and even though I'm not a big fan of Marshall JCM2000 I found the very good and I recommend it, but this one is rather poor.
I think we can find much better for the same price, while still in his "English" type Marshall.
UTILIZATION
Super mega simple, level and gain indépandant EQ per channel and common. It is therefore a homogeneous amp EQ does not interfere too common.
Marshall is the caricature as can be, no matter the position of the knobs for EQ, there's always the same, so 2 = 2-channel sound. The clean has a good gain margin before saturation is quite nice.
SOUNDS
Wow I'm not destester Marshall, this one I like it. The clean is worthy of a good transistor, I think I have the same on my AVT. There is no depth and little momentum, very little extent, the sound seems very tighten, narrow. However I tested it on an 4x12 ".
For saturation, I played the AC / DC and a little Led Zep ... But nothing else (though I do not lack influence and reference) I was hyper blocked. The sound is distinctive and highly inflexible, you must love the amp as the spit, but then I found it particularly dirty, rough ... And always flat and narrow, as if I was playing on a small amp while it is supposed to send the wood ... I had the same presence / power projection and the same with my AVT100 Bof bof ... everything.
OVERALL OPINION
According to the forums There is the JCM800 and JCM2000 worth every penny in Marshall, I am at least agree that the JCM900 is below the JCM2000. I've never played on a 800, but I do not miss it.
Well, this amp has disappointed me, the same day I played a JCM2000 TSL122, a C50, a Hot Rod, an AC-30 and F30 and I all found above the JCM900. You really liked, and even though I'm not a big fan of Marshall JCM2000 I found the very good and I recommend it, but this one is rather poor.
I think we can find much better for the same price, while still in his "English" type Marshall.