Le Taz
Published on 05/25/07 at 09:04
I know the Rocket II, but that I should be the same, if not the form (threats at Gibson no doubt)
So theoretically, mahogany and alder COTP, fixed bridge, 3-position selector, volume and tone peculiar since it appears to assay the marriage of each of the coils 2 humbuckers: a kind of progressive split.
Must assume the look (especially in black and white for allergic Scorpions) ...
It has the look of the flying V
UTILIZATION
The handle is reminiscent of the paul (ie distance from the flying V), ^ ^ ot pleased vintage.
Can we do better access to acute issue?
Lighter than a gibson (because of alder for the body) but it is well balanced.
SOUNDS
It is obvious that with such a look, it is matter in the universe gibson sound. There are fat, but the sound is more defined, less loaded down media, we have much more attack. I did not check, but it seems to me that Duesenberg had a tuning fork-type fender, which explains the side of the punchy guitar.
However, I read in the press that it was a guitar-oriented metal ...
Disagree: it is a guitar that deserves to be played in styles ranging from blues to heavy rock. Electronics is a marvel that gives, if not the versatility of a huge range of sounds at hand. Lovers of the British blues boom, Hendrix will be over the moon.
OVERALL OPINION
I put him 7 because I have not had time to buy it (it was about 1000 euro) and in addition it was only available in black and white. Model out of the catalog, but I bet the Rocket II is as well. Even if the new asymmetrical design makes it even less attractive to my taste. Excellent guitar.
So theoretically, mahogany and alder COTP, fixed bridge, 3-position selector, volume and tone peculiar since it appears to assay the marriage of each of the coils 2 humbuckers: a kind of progressive split.
Must assume the look (especially in black and white for allergic Scorpions) ...
It has the look of the flying V
UTILIZATION
The handle is reminiscent of the paul (ie distance from the flying V), ^ ^ ot pleased vintage.
Can we do better access to acute issue?
Lighter than a gibson (because of alder for the body) but it is well balanced.
SOUNDS
It is obvious that with such a look, it is matter in the universe gibson sound. There are fat, but the sound is more defined, less loaded down media, we have much more attack. I did not check, but it seems to me that Duesenberg had a tuning fork-type fender, which explains the side of the punchy guitar.
However, I read in the press that it was a guitar-oriented metal ...
Disagree: it is a guitar that deserves to be played in styles ranging from blues to heavy rock. Electronics is a marvel that gives, if not the versatility of a huge range of sounds at hand. Lovers of the British blues boom, Hendrix will be over the moon.
OVERALL OPINION
I put him 7 because I have not had time to buy it (it was about 1000 euro) and in addition it was only available in black and white. Model out of the catalog, but I bet the Rocket II is as well. Even if the new asymmetrical design makes it even less attractive to my taste. Excellent guitar.