Jackson RR3 Randy Rhoads
Jackson RR3 Randy Rhoads

RR3 Randy Rhoads, V/XPL/FB Shaped Guitar from Jackson in the Pro series.

  • Increase or decrease font size
  • Print
  • RSS

All user reviews for the Jackson RR3 Randy Rhoads

  • Like
  • Tweet
  • Submit
Average Score:4.4( 4.4/5 based on 18 reviews )
 8 reviews44 %
 9 reviews50 %
 1 user review6 %
Buy at Sweetwater

Gortch's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Jackson RR3 Randy Rhoads
It's a Japanese guitar
it has a Bolt with 22 boxes
Seymour Duncan
easel-like floyd
there is a knob for volume and two microphones for I believe
look at it is responsible, super geule!


The neck is super enjoyable, trs end, and the V-shape allows the ACCS Acute easy (even if it was not the comfort of a neck-through). It's a lightweight guitar, no back pain after 5 minutes of play. She is not hyper, but balance is not bad, a varies straps I used too. To play it is not unpleasant sitting (unlike her sister KingV), just play like a classical guitar.
S'obtiens sound without problems.


I took this guitar to play metal and it fulfills its role, it has a sound and sharp prcis that does not bleed but the pickups are pretty cool, it's going for the blast but its clear they lack the gloss . I tried on an old marshall master lead combo and a fender twin and there's not to say there is that the marshall and gain a background for it to pass. I will soon receive a randall RH150, I hope it will have a big sound microphones are the only vritable weakness of this instrument.

EDIT 20/04/08:

I changed the SETTING THE scratching for a drop of C, I also brought the microphone cords and sounds really better! the Randall (I finally REU) is also something. I'll change the note because with the most suitable rglages like scratching the road!


I use it for about 6 months. I love the look and finish, but it's a shame they do not like a better sound (maybe I'll change the pickups a few times). I bought on a whim after seeing a skyscraper of the same shape in a live Sepultura 1994. I think I will not repeat that choice. later can be, I am interested in a guitar the same shape but with other pickups.
monsieur plume04/14/2008

monsieur plume's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Jackson RR3 Randy Rhoads
CHARACTERISTICS for all t dja said.

I think that micro Contents you can find much better.


The handle is trs enjoyable, it's a pleasure to play.
CHAC is the acute impcable.
The guitar is really not lourde.La form does not impede to play by standing against sitting is unplayable! I confess that I too n'apprcie these forms even if the c ' True, the look is gnial.


I play mostly rock, punk, hard rock and metal and sometimes quieter stuff like the metal is really reggae.Pour gnial however for clean sounds There's so much better.
I think this guitar should be more rhythmic than the big solos (Angus Young style or Jani Liimatainen).
This guitar is not it trs trs versatile metal shaft, it is suitable for mtalleux parfaitement.Si you are looking for versatile guitars will rather see in Gibson.


I do not possde this guitar but I test in a store and here are the default key that I found this guitar: it is trs (too?) Axis and thus metal trs not versatile and is unplayable seat.
Beware of this guitar should mtalleux but not others (the price is just having a good Ibanez for versatility or 200 euros more you can get a Gibson).
Do not be fooled by the great look of this guitar, I think for that price, it gets better.

Tritt's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Jackson RR3 Randy Rhoads
- Guitar made in Japan
nothing special to add.

- Look
to die for, this guitar is beautiful, as soon as I saw in the window I could not resist. It is crimson red and has no pickguard (and that's good I think it's ugly). The chrome hardware is beautiful, it is even engraved on the inside, not really there's no shit in Jackson are masters in design.

- 2 humbuckers Seymour Duncan "designed"
a real shit these microphones are a disgrace to the brand Seymour Duncan, the sound is dirty and cold, I quickly rushed to exchange them against a kit EMG 81 / 85 which, really pierces your ass. After I may be unlucky because on other criticism of this guitar has some genuine Seymour Duncan which obviously changes everything.

- Floyd Jackson
Then I siterais no names but I saw a review on something like "yeah the floyd is not bad too I m'exite dessu and sometimes it takes the agreement." Frankly, this thing is crap, it is likely the same for all Floyds at least those that price (yes I am perhaps a ignard but I give my honest opinion). No but honestly, have a floyd is great in principle, I am the first to play with but does not agree so it spoils all the fun obtained during its use ... Furthermore, having a guitar made for metal and more able to change tuning without having to open it. That's why I'm as eager to block> 8D, and is the ultimate foot, I can always make the dive bomb but pull back so I do not care what his Disagree

- A single knob for volume
Yes, a single knob AND ITS JUST VERY WELL.

- 22 round boxes screwed.


- 22 round boxes screwed
It took me some time to reach me up with the saw teeth but now it's really niquel. The neck is very thin, very fast and very nice, unfortunately the damage access to the latest box is really limited ... because the main bump on the tip of the handle as it is not hollowed out like a RR1 at this time and frankly it's pretty boring but hey, we get used to it ... I wish I had 24 boxes too, but hey, it already looks a bit with 22 I dare imagine with 24 ^. ^ '


- Style of music
I play metal of all kinds, but mostly i like to do like everybody solos masturbage handle, and with this guitar since I turned the microphones of shit I take my foot completely>: D.

- I play on a TonePort UX2 (external sound card special Line 6) and that's exactly what I wanted, really perfect sound we all seek in vain. Before I played on a line 6 amp and a ubermetal and it was not bad at all either.

- I like the heavy rhythm and effective (hence the micro EMG 81) solos and sweeping clean and well rounded (thus the cut 81/85)


I use it for 2 years, I am a little harsh on the criticism but it's really a beautiful instrument.
I love its look and cofortable gaming
Before I had a Peavy pourrave, what a change!
The value for money would be interresting if it was mounted with real Seymour Duncan!
With the experience I would do so this choice without hesitation.

laiho95's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Jackson RR3 Randy Rhoads
- In which country was it made?
This is a guitar made in japan!

- How many frets, what kind of micro as well as their configuration?
Unfortunately, 22 frets, the pickups are two Seymour Duncan

- What type of bridge (Floyd, Wilkinson ...)?
Floyd Rose Licensed

- What are the settings (volume, tone, micro switch ...)?
A selector 3 positions and 3 pots (2 volumes and one tone)


- The handle is it fun?
Yes, yes, the stick is more enjoyable, but coming from Jackson it does not surprise me!

- Access to acute (recent freight) is it easy?
Yes enough, despite the heel can easily go to the 22nd fret

- Ergonomics is it good (in terms of shape, weight ...)?
In terms of form ... must love! I find this guitar extremely lightweight ergonomic good enough!

- Gets it easy to sound good? ...
I find I play on a 15W Behringer jpeux and tell you that the sound is niquel, long live the seymour duncan!


- They are suitable to your style of music?
Yes totally, I play death metal!

- With what (s) amplifier (s) or effect (s) do you play?
As mentioned above, a 15W Behringer (for now)

- What kind of sound you get and with what settings ("crystalline", "bold ",....)?
Whether bold or its lens, the sound is really niquel, I really do not know what to say about this guitar!


I use it for the past 48 hours, what I like least in this guitar is a sore thigh that gives you when you play too much sitting! ^ ^ And what I like most ... sound quite versatile Duncan, the look, and especially his sleeve! Before I tried to buy a Jackson PS-3 and an LTD EX 400 black diamond (which is also a very good guitar) and I definitely took the RR3! The value for money is not good either be excellent, this guitar shows good jackson! The future will tell me if I made the right choice!

budup's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Jackson RR3 Randy Rhoads
3 position selector
Seymour Duncan Humbucker 2 Micro
2 volume knob
1 tone knob
Floyd Rose tremolo
22 Frets


The handle is it fun?
Channel End Pleasant

- Access to acute (recent freight) is it easy?
However, the frets are so légerments too big, j'obterais finest that the jumbo Eto

- Ergonomics is it good (in terms of shape, weight ...)?
The body is more or less balanced, the head slightly heavy but no more
It weighs 4.2kg ^ ^

- Gets it easy to sound good? ...
So, the harmonics are no problems, not have to strain like a patient on the ropes for much vaire ring, the more I find the tone not so good
His rather dry, but not so warm to my taste ...


- They are suitable to your style of music?
I play a little bit of spinning tops jazz, blues, but I'm more focused on the metal, so .. I can say that in terms of metal, the pickups are not best suited for nan, they released a probe Trof cold .. I have a washburn mg340 more low-end distortion and the sound is more aggressive baucoup

- With what (s) amplifier (s) or effect (s) do you play?
- Washburn VGA 30 / Leaney TF-300 / Pioner 3000 and its more or less well suited for this award but it's more the style of the guitar is the boss that his .. find it little better for her at this price

- What kind of sound you get and with what settings ("crystalline", "bold ",....)?
Not crystal clear top ... is fairly flat is too powerful especially on the treble without any pedals


- How long have you use it?
For a little over 6 months

- Have you tried many other models before buying it?
Nah not really I bought it via notices Audiofanzine

- How would you rate the quality / price?
Too expensive, as the look is great but the sound is much to see

- With experience, you do again this choice? ...
No, I would put more money in another guitar without a new look

cortzan's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Jackson RR3 Randy Rhoads
2 humbucker Seymour Duncan
A 3 position pickup selector
1 tone knob
2 volume knob
A floyd rose bridge
Unfortunately only 22 Frets


Nice round end
The access to acute, is fairly easy, it's a normal flying
That will be a flying, it is a little hard to play sitting but when we found the technique is good;)

Rather well-balanced guitar, it looks a little annoying but c'es pa ... it weighs 4.2 kg I think

On the treble when you got the fingers of potatoes is not terrible, but the power of the pickups are excellent

Only problem is with the floyd rose, as when any change in diameter of rope, you got the floyd derived by a rather boring background and c


Personally I am a bottom, and company in the metal, but it happens, from time to time to touch the blues.
It suits my style, it fits very well in the rock 'n roll, metal, and other ...
Even if it is not made to play jazz and another, it still gives a good sound.
I play on a 30 amp washburn vga
It disting real difference between the microphone near the handle and one near the bridge.

It has a sound that stands out, but you can do better on it ca


I use it for 4 months
I like its looks (I have black)
I can not say I try to open before falling over, I relied on the opinion of each
I bought € 420 (excluding tax & shipping not live on the mainland)
So I can say it has a good value for money

With experience, I would contribute more to another guitar, but with a budget of less than € 500 I n'ésiterez not

Anonymous 's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Jackson RR3 Randy Rhoads
I RR3 with the head "reverse" and Seymour Duncan design
(See photos on my profile ...)
made in Japan.
22 boxes
bought new about 6000 francs 3 years ago


The handle is pleasant trs, trs wide end, ideal for sweeping! it requires an adjustment period for those who used to play on the neck like Gibson.
Then, for Access in acute .... frankly, I find it terrible ca.
this guitar is relatively lgre and despite its particular form can even play sitting on (set to "classic"). it is not too bad equilibrated (given the shape!), but AC looks a little bit of the head of the cot when you are playing up and we loose the handle ... but hey, it's really not Gnant as you play! (no relation to a BC Rich "Iron Bird / Injouabledebout!")
the floyd is the road I never support it as a sick but even using it often takes the tuning ca nikel!


The sound?
for metal saturation is excellent for most acute with the microphone, frankly ca "crash" and it's clean! Revenge in the micro serious lack of "punch" of grain and PersonAll. (As a result I almost never use it: damages for solos!)
except for the metal autrechose that is not even bother!
the clean sound is really not great (better have a good multi-effects to correct AC), it sounds "flat", not brilliant, and acute micro saturates quickly ... but good anyway this guitar n ' no t designed for the "blues / jazz man".
even the handle, which is more oriented "modern games" (sweeping, taping, jumping rope) that "traditional games rock" (run off and end no question of passing the thumb over the neck except for ... big hands!)


I have this guitar for about three years. I had other guitars and I test a lot since then.

good, you really have to be blind and deaf to not realize that this guitar is for a unique style of music.

report quality price ... I think these guitars (Jackson, BC Rich ... etc) is way over priced for what it is! you pays particular look and brand, everyone plays jackson and prices escalated ... cot manufacturing is the big industry, Scher left the wood just 4 months and they'll back a guitar with that! for those who are fond of the look, I advise them to move (for the same price) instead of LAG or MOSQUITO.

we can not say whether it be a guitar shit but anyway I would do not have that choice! next time, I will buy a "real" instrument, like Vigier Excalibur, or a MusicMan GAUDIN ....( good on it ... it's not the same price ...)

+ what I love: the look, the handle, the microphone saturation in acute ... excellent for metal and hard rock
what I like least: no trs versatile, micro serious (but hey, you can always change it!), clear sound

I put as global rating 7 / 10 for the report MAKING METAL / qualitPRIX
if I were to note the report VERSATILITY / quality / price I would have put a note of 5 / 10

morgoth's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Jackson RR3 Randy Rhoads
Made in Korea
Alder body
Handle Saddle al vissbr /> Buttons Rosewood
22 jumbo frtes
Neck pickup Seymour Duncan Detonator humbucker
Same as pickup
Floyd Rose tremolo
Volume knobs neck pickup and bridge, Ring gnrale


Channel TRS end, giga enjoyable play
Access in acute super easy since it's a guitar style flying
Ergonomics of a guitar flying can not be very easy to play while sitting or must have the technical
Level weight more lightweight than my strat tom delonge less than 3kg
Its crazy especially for fans of hard rock and mtal
But the guitar is versatile qd same trs trs trs and behaves well in tt styles


Fits any style of music but with a versatile trs prdominance mtal for hard rock and it's a Randy Rhoads (guitarist who played with Ozzy Osbourne)
Behringer Blue Devil GX 112, V-AMP2


4 months of use and I'm crazy about this guitar (maybe not as much as my girlfriend even qd)
+ Points: guitar head
Points -: no
Price not trs trs lev for a guitar of this quality 800 euros
IT'S THE BALL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!