View other reviews for this product:
Le Taz
Published on 08/17/14 at 02:30
There are several types of Orville Flying V, between the models 67 (rare in France) and 58 (even rarer), but also the manufacturing, Terada (the most common) and Fujigen Gakki. My model is a Fujigen Gakki, varnish vintage banged up and was apparently equipped with a gold Vibrola acastillage. It is apparently rare, I have only found a few identical models pictured on google.
We design Flying V normal: mahogany body and neck, rosewood fingerboard.
UTILIZATION
The C-shaped handle my Fujigen is atypical, far profiles D flat (or very flat) of Gibson Flying V current. He could recall the handles of Epiphone models of the 90's years. A very nice profile, feeling "baseball bat". Those who play on Music Man or 70s strats understand. It's very nice, especially with the thumb on top. The Vibrola was disassembled for a better grip agree, and I must say that the mechanical origin do a very good job. Stroke of luck, because that was not the case on my other Orville or Burny.
This guitar is also remarkable for its construction: the handle is shifted upwards, and therefore the key higher relative to the body, providing high sound projection of the instrument, as far as my copy of Les Paul Florentine , a half box. It does not solve the limits of sustain, suitable for all Flying V, but it gives her the dynamics of the body even in crunch or clean, with lots of bass.
The rest is comfort Flying V. No itchy head with my model, but we must get used to the comfort of playing with the lack of support for the forearm (it is surprising at first) . You can always jack stuck in his belt (to prevent it from being lifted) but it is very unsightly. At last but not least, we had a nice tool to maneuver, so be careful not to stick it to blow hot reproducing Scorpions or Randy Rhoads in his office or in his room.
SOUNDS
What surprises with this guitar is the width of the sound spectrum. If you have less sustain than a Les Paul, we have a more open sound like the SG, while retaining much of the body. We forget, but it's really a sacred guitar for blues. It did not happen once I kind of case without subjecting it to a small Baby Please Do not Go.'s Original pickups are not great. They do the minimum taf (saved by the resonance of the instrument), with its sometimes accurate, and fairly sharp treble to double. It surprises at first, but it looks close enough to render P90, and when one is in classic rock or blues, it's very nice. I left "stock" because it is the one that best matches at my head with Marshall YJM for vintage sounds.
It does not have the performance of a Les Paul, or SG, is another guitar. The limit may be compared to another "modern" Explorer. It gives me a kind of intermediary between SG and LP, in terms of body and power, I understand that a lot of guitarists have adopted the Heavy, it is less and more accurate thanks to the big saturax that a Les Paul, with more body and less "twang" than a SG. Gibson's own, this little trick is kept biting when you do vibrato on a double bend.
In short, it's not a guitar jazz or funk, it's a lead guitar, you do blues or hard. Although not a fan of SH4, I think it should perfectly suit this guitar, as Classic 57 elsewhere. I'm not a metalhead, but I think with the acoustics of the instrument, very rich, mounting kit EMG could be explosive, and offer amazing clean tones, filling the entire spectrum with power. Mounting a piezo would also I think particularly compelling about this guitar.
I put 7 because the potential is there, you just change the mic.
OVERALL OPINION
Unconvinced by the Gibson Flying V current (mainly medium and very fragile faded really), I had gone to buy a Epiphone 90s or one of 58 current Korina who seemed better than their big American sisters. In the end, I came across this Orville, by chance. I hesitated because it was not the budget I was planning to put in a second guitar (I play on Music Man and Telecaster mostly), but the profile of the handle has cracked me. I hate the ultra-flat and wide sleeves of current productions, and then I had a handle that I like, ergonomic, with just enough roundness to fit the palm of the hand without being thick, allowing fast game. We go all over: Plan tapping as big bluesy bend without fatiguing remaining compulsorily academic position.
Next, we must also take the look, it does not pass unnoticed with Flying V. So if in addition it is a rare model, a little relic patina of time, it gives you the look of a fighter rock out of a 70's attic.
A very good guitar that deserves a change of pickups, and whose handle will be appreciated by all body hand. If the playability of the present Flying V gives you trouble, it's a great alternative.
We design Flying V normal: mahogany body and neck, rosewood fingerboard.
UTILIZATION
The C-shaped handle my Fujigen is atypical, far profiles D flat (or very flat) of Gibson Flying V current. He could recall the handles of Epiphone models of the 90's years. A very nice profile, feeling "baseball bat". Those who play on Music Man or 70s strats understand. It's very nice, especially with the thumb on top. The Vibrola was disassembled for a better grip agree, and I must say that the mechanical origin do a very good job. Stroke of luck, because that was not the case on my other Orville or Burny.
This guitar is also remarkable for its construction: the handle is shifted upwards, and therefore the key higher relative to the body, providing high sound projection of the instrument, as far as my copy of Les Paul Florentine , a half box. It does not solve the limits of sustain, suitable for all Flying V, but it gives her the dynamics of the body even in crunch or clean, with lots of bass.
The rest is comfort Flying V. No itchy head with my model, but we must get used to the comfort of playing with the lack of support for the forearm (it is surprising at first) . You can always jack stuck in his belt (to prevent it from being lifted) but it is very unsightly. At last but not least, we had a nice tool to maneuver, so be careful not to stick it to blow hot reproducing Scorpions or Randy Rhoads in his office or in his room.
SOUNDS
What surprises with this guitar is the width of the sound spectrum. If you have less sustain than a Les Paul, we have a more open sound like the SG, while retaining much of the body. We forget, but it's really a sacred guitar for blues. It did not happen once I kind of case without subjecting it to a small Baby Please Do not Go.'s Original pickups are not great. They do the minimum taf (saved by the resonance of the instrument), with its sometimes accurate, and fairly sharp treble to double. It surprises at first, but it looks close enough to render P90, and when one is in classic rock or blues, it's very nice. I left "stock" because it is the one that best matches at my head with Marshall YJM for vintage sounds.
It does not have the performance of a Les Paul, or SG, is another guitar. The limit may be compared to another "modern" Explorer. It gives me a kind of intermediary between SG and LP, in terms of body and power, I understand that a lot of guitarists have adopted the Heavy, it is less and more accurate thanks to the big saturax that a Les Paul, with more body and less "twang" than a SG. Gibson's own, this little trick is kept biting when you do vibrato on a double bend.
In short, it's not a guitar jazz or funk, it's a lead guitar, you do blues or hard. Although not a fan of SH4, I think it should perfectly suit this guitar, as Classic 57 elsewhere. I'm not a metalhead, but I think with the acoustics of the instrument, very rich, mounting kit EMG could be explosive, and offer amazing clean tones, filling the entire spectrum with power. Mounting a piezo would also I think particularly compelling about this guitar.
I put 7 because the potential is there, you just change the mic.
OVERALL OPINION
Unconvinced by the Gibson Flying V current (mainly medium and very fragile faded really), I had gone to buy a Epiphone 90s or one of 58 current Korina who seemed better than their big American sisters. In the end, I came across this Orville, by chance. I hesitated because it was not the budget I was planning to put in a second guitar (I play on Music Man and Telecaster mostly), but the profile of the handle has cracked me. I hate the ultra-flat and wide sleeves of current productions, and then I had a handle that I like, ergonomic, with just enough roundness to fit the palm of the hand without being thick, allowing fast game. We go all over: Plan tapping as big bluesy bend without fatiguing remaining compulsorily academic position.
Next, we must also take the look, it does not pass unnoticed with Flying V. So if in addition it is a rare model, a little relic patina of time, it gives you the look of a fighter rock out of a 70's attic.
A very good guitar that deserves a change of pickups, and whose handle will be appreciated by all body hand. If the playability of the present Flying V gives you trouble, it's a great alternative.