All user reviews for the Pioneer DJM-800

Hello everyone,

A console DJM 800 arrived in my loc Park, I unpack the matter is some details make me cringe:

- 2 mic channels, but only one common setting !!! Really rotten ...
- Setting serious, acute on the road and nothing else, it's super or medium?
- Average quality workmanship.
- A sound better than the 600 (there have not been many bad).
- Fader and crossfader very hard.
- She not bad breath.
- The connection is economic.

I plug the youngest, the sound is Boffe, the average manufacturing quality and IS DEFECTIVE, ROUTE MICRO CRAQUE, PRE-AMP IS HS !!!

Good going I but instead of an individual who buys it, I freak out !!!

My problem is that in a rental fleet reliability of the product is a number, I rent, I not praise?

I go but 3 of 10 to encourage Pioneer (he is doing better than the poor 600), if you bought a try before the small advises friends.

USE

See above.

SOUNDS

See above.

NOTICE GLOBAL

See above.

Beat Effects Delay, Echo, Reverse Delay, Pan, Trnace, Filter, Flanger, Phaser, Reverb, Robot, Chorus, Roll, Reverse Roll

Harmonic effects, Sweep, Crush, Filter

Control MIDI / HID MIDI controls (61 fully assignable)

Number of channels 4

Frequency / Color Depth 96 kHz / 24-bit digital mixer
* 3-band EQ per channel -26 ~ +6
* Optional Rotary Faders
* Meter Individual level 15 segments

* CD Input / Line (RCA) 5
* PHONO (RCA) 3
* S / PDIF (RCA) 4
* MIC Input (XLR) 1
* MIC Input (6.35) 1
* RETURN (Jack 6.35) 1

* Master Output (XLR) 1
* Master Output (RCA) 1
* Output (Jack 6.35) 1 (TRS)
* Rec Out (RCA) 1
* Digital output (coaxial) 1 (48 kHz or 96 kHz)
* Digital Output (RCA) x 1 (SP / DIF) (48kHz or 96kHz)
* Send (Jack 6.35) 1
* Monitor Output Yes

# Mic Connection Neutrik Combo (x2), Phone (x1)
# 2-band EQ microphone
# Mic EQ band -6 to +6 dB
# Talkover Switch 3 positions
# Talkover automatic

* Dimensions (L x W x D) 320 x 108 x 381 mm
* 8 kg
* Power Consumption 30 Watt
* SN Ratio: Line 105 dB
* SN Ratio: Phono 88 dB
* SN Ratio: Mic 84 dB
* Harmonic Distortion 0.005%
* Crosstalk: 82 dB dB Line

UTILIZATION

Simple, easy to learn, very nice to mix with.

SOUNDS

Very quiet, very effective. One of the best mixer of the decade in my opinion.

OVERALL OPINION

I do not use very little at all and even more these days because I work on the DJM 900.
It completely worth it because it has maximum functionality to the mix.

At the top, the reference for years.

I still have some regrets at the features:
- Can not adjust the resonance filters (sometimes a little too present)
- Can filter effect (an echo for example) without filtering music at the same time (unlike his sister DJM700)
- The Master side of the headset is connected to the output Master1 not the REC, so that the master level plays on the headphone, impossible to listen to the master in the headphones when the level is low, for example . Bit annoying club table because often high, but mobile disco it can be annoying (at least to adjust the level to max 7/10 instead of 0 in light meter, and down behind the system, but loss of accuracy in light meter and loss of sound quality). This is valid for all consoles Pioneer 4 ways.

UTILIZATION

Very simple configuration, everything is easily accessible, Pioneer ergonomics nothing to say.

SOUNDS

Despite some negative reviews about the sound, I find the console completely transparent, without breath, no change in the sound. In addition, one of the only console market with digital inputs, I admit to not having felt the obvious difference, but it avoids multiple conversions NAC NAC.

OVERALL OPINION

I bought used some time ago because I wanted a sturdy table and ergonomic, so Pioneer came out ahead. I did not find any interest in using the brand new consoles because I mix in CDJ, so I do not need the integrated sound card. Apart from that, I find the DJM850 lower due to the elimination of the digital inputs (beat despite the effects color quite nice), and DJM900 little better, because the only differences are the improved effects (I use shortly), the quantize on the effects (+ +), Ethernet jack to also have a Cue from rekordbox (cable-rca jack does the same thing on a free channel), and 4 positions per input switches ( + +).

If you want a table like this, I really advise you to buy this one, used as the new range and the emergence of controllers, many people sell it at prices that finally become quality / price!

I put 10/10 only for the price that I paid!

Everything has been said about which patterns.

UTILIZATION

Pioneer does not belie its aura of quality. The faders are solid, the knobs too. I had a little fear on the coating lacquer which could have easily wear but it is nothing other than a few fingerprints, AC will be the only concern! This console also features adjustable crossfader and headphone handy.

SOUNDS

The equalize is correct but rather at the box of color and sound effects that we enjoy. Ultra accessible and adjustable in the blink of an eye, the sound quality is present.

OVERALL OPINION

It's been two years since I'm on it, I was 10 years on a DJM500. Simply place your hands on one of these models to understand why there are references in the field. Indestructible and easy to access. The only downside is its price, high but you have to at least 10 years old and meet new models, the DJM800 yet filled all the necessary functions perfectly.

Yes the console rack is identical in size to the 600
the number of votes c is the same as the 600 but little more than think the master is no longer next to the other fader is at the top he saw the master meters which is faster when you mix the acroché
effect of the box is well designed there is a digital display that parameter much like the 600, with some effects as well as the reverse rev they are really thinking
But I will still wait till it drops a bit before investing is a bit expensive is finally normal c and c is the launch of qualitée

UTILIZATION

Having used a djm 600 for me before getting started is fairly simple sy it is faster for the short time I've tried it in the lounge siel
we find the same function as the cross 600 is still better, will satisfy those who scratch and I think others will be delighted to discover the new effects and more and move the master

SOUNDS

The table has a good sound c is really a good product it just get between the 1000 is really expensive and where to invest in boxes of 600 and aditional effect that begins to age a bit, now the ideal and versatile tools is the expected lower prices

OVERALL OPINION

I've tried in the siel with 2 cdj 800 c which attracted me is the grip the cross which is not bad at all, the Master moving (finally) because it had to get a lot of you who are mixing with the 600 or 500 to find the master misplaced when using the voice 4 and then the different effects and the display is well done
quality / price ratio should not be out of illusion in some weeks it will be a 1600 euros, it's worth because there is all the investment made on design and construction that must be profitable but for the next year it should fall well
and c is the light that it drops I bought the

DJM 800 bought last month. It is a vritable killing ...
Console DJM 600 format, it is the rack if achte Querre to put in 19 inches.
- 2-way and 4-channel mic music (ph - line and digital)
- Output on XLR and jack symtrique 6.35 assymtrique for dpart / return and exit the cabin.
- The eq is not paramtrique (all fawn, I have rarely seen a DJ mixer). It cuts the low / medium / high until-26dB, but the dates do ls that a + 6 (???), finally limit the damage to DJ a little nag at the edges ...
- A double Intgr multi-effect: the walk! left a blue call "color FX" which features a LPF Filter, Notch Filter one (which looks more like a band-pass for me, a bit Krusher, and a pitch. Everything RULES is with the color knob on each channel .... Although jou pioneer.
- A second multi-purpose, like the 600 on algorithms with good year. We have available: delay, echo (with maintenance of the feedback of the cutoff Unlike the DJM 600), reverse delay, auto pan, transfer, filter (with LFO), flanger, PAHs, Robot (with pitch an LFO), reverb (with maintenance of cutting off the sustain effect), and Back Roll Roll + a send / return for connecting all types of multi-purpose filter or eg ...
The sampler of the DJM 600 is here replaced by the function t Roll back and Roll. It is well thought out and much faster than the grate 600. Imagine a loop as you can dcouper (in the tempo up to 1 / 64. ... Terrible To this end, I nanmoins prfr an on / type of push is to say that when the support effect lights, and when released, the effect s'teint. It's handy when you wish to make an on / off F trs is fast. It is only dtail and fawn any, the mixer n'xiste yet lol.
Small BMOL also for the reverb which really is not super clean ...
- For a console numrique, I find her really hot and dynamic, they have put the package on the A / D and D / A. At this price it may be logical.
- They also make pens console Fully MIDI is that the buttons and knobs are all automated.

UTILIZATION

- The config gnrale is really simple and intuitive. Not need the doc to understand. Everything is accessible and well located. The same master silent changes place from the 600 and now it is a rotating top right (we do not move more recklessly ...). We can also assign all channels to Croos fader.
Among the new features, note also the possibility to adjust the curve of growth and the cross fader. It's really because of a default of 600 to have silent type linear fader: the position is a well tended dja sound. L is corrected on the 800, you can choose a logarithmic progression as the Rodec / Ecler etc..

SOUNDS

- The console is transparent? Months, she is black lacquer ... lol.
The sound is really great my good taste. It is warm and well dynamics.
- No wind output.
- The qualiseur is it effective? ... read above

OVERALL OPINION

- I use my home for a month. I do it again the same choice without hsiter second. This is the new DJ in REFERENCE happens ..!!!
- The price may be a bit expensive to buy, but I think it is justified.

Hello, DJM800 purchased today. then yum yum ...
Is Rack?
yes, but the options are quite expensive I crois.www.fxsystem.fr
How many lanes, bus attendant, departures, returns ...)?
4 channels + mic, digital inputs, good just read the features lol.
A departure, a return.
What is the type of connection (RCA, Jack, XLR ...)?
rca yes (I / O)
jack yes (I / O send / return)
Yes XLR (out)
The parametric equalizer is it?
no, the setting made a cut but not kill, at least for me.
Otherwise the settings are very precise and clean, it cuts really well anyway, with effects anyway There's colors that make the case the above!
An effects section is it integrated? ...
oooh yes, better than 600 in any case, the function for the effects bpm is terrible, even the sound cut the bpm takes over when the sound reviend.
To see the effects of available features.
What is the accuracy of the sample (bits / kHz)?
24/96, exit 41 or 96
Automation is supported? *
I do not understand the word automation sorry, I hold the rest ... lol
What type of sync are supported? ...
bin guys, MIDI sync ALL knobs for use ext kind Ableton Live / Reason.

UTILIZATION

The general configuration is it simple?
yes, certainly, no doc, and all functions ok, nikel!
The usual functions are they easily accessible?
yes, the mix of basic problem-free, color effects available direct effects
on the right application 5 to 10 min of adaptation.
The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
french (or other), clear patterns, some have read them 2 times lol, but in the essemble is well treated

SOUNDS

The console is transparent?
yes, I took myself clear, lol.
Seriously, the sound is a very good ear, I'm not pro audio pros, but we are pleased the ear.
She introduced the breath?
no, nikel
The equalizer is effective? ...
as mentioned above is the cut for me, not the kill, something arranged by color effects. Let's not kill ca ca cut pro but I understand, the curve cutoff is well studied

OVERALL OPINION

How long have you use it?
lol, one day
What is so special that you like most and least?
I like everything, there's even with training, possible when the sound is off but it eg echo, echo the lead very far (+ 30 sec) in the tempo with the other piece with the tap tempo (I also understand the lol).
Have you tried many other models before buying it?
bin models, unless for the cd but yes, the key anyway.
How would you rate the quality / price?
At first it is rather difficult, but after that happens when the music very well give, give, give ...
With experience, you do again this choice? ...
ooooh yes! pioneer thx, I see what "ESSEC mix!"

Finally, for anyone not understand what I say too much (although it's almost understandable) I'll make a video of the beast this weekend on my site, www.djleo.org.

While appointment at the site by Monday / Tuesday and I can tell you ca be worth it, as for other videos

See Pioneer site.

UTILIZATION

See below.

SOUNDS

See below.

OVERALL OPINION

Dj 3 months of use discothque 7 / 7: (we are 3 DJs)

What I like:
- The race adjustable fader
- Ergonomics
- The Roll, beaoucoup better than the sampler.
- The effects color, fairly well if the fucking mem rsonnance is not adjustable on the low pass filter / high. I AIM a notch too.
- The phaser enough russi
- The step trs readable.
- The quantization effects for shorter and longer.
- Buttons on selection of the quantification of the effect that rpondent better than a 500/600.
- CUE buttons.
- The master rotating top.
- The MIDI.
- The talkover placed intelligently this time.
- The cumulative effects.

What I dislike:

- Rubber knobs! Is shit! 3 months and I have a dj death. Just as a dj have some long nails and they are screwed up!
- No Master 2!
- The connectivity and no limits trs trs spaces.
- Assignment of the buttons crossfaser too big, too difficult to allocate over night.
- GAIN buttons too small!
- Taking micro facade is not XLR.
- The reverb is still zero!
- The fader start! Does anybody use it? ?
- The color crush is a bit too powerful.
- The EQ nag not musical, it's finally good a Pioneer!
- The cross fader curve, the curve of the medium does not use it would have been better if the signal is max at the center or better, an adjustable cross a curve.
- Switches Phono / Line can no longer do transform!
- The Send / return does not be accumulated with the master effect.
- The Roll is not the 3 / 4 time, it could be gnial.
- Sound is blah, no relief.
- That even when trs expensive for what it is.
- It is still not the caf!

Yes it and rack to transport it your best painting secaillerais easily
for channels that there is quil
no parametric equalizer for my ca used by a much pa
the effects are great, some effects are always useless to stay and both are futuristic tro (robot), no click to the triggering of effects, clean

UTILIZATION

She very quickly and in hand pa need a manual for those who are the abitude of 600,
functions well and all have good and accessible

SOUNDS

Be good sound, no breath, no sizzle, vca faders a bit harsh but a matter dabitude

OVERALL OPINION

5 months always use a little top heavy
jaime ergonomics are very robust look above the levels of aluminum pots with canon except for the effects, the fader is the same as ameliorers vca ca pa no crack,
the price and a little high but for me the blow your
I would do the same choice
the new reference!

- Yes it is 19 inch rack-mount size
- 4 channels, 2 CD, 3 phono, 2 line, 2 microphone jack, headphone jack
- It has RCA connectors on, Jack, XLR and coaxial.
- It has effect possde a box really well done pioneer really neat because the box has a bright screen easy to read colors + effects which are a low share gniaux be the effect crush

For chantillonage it goes 48kHz 96kHz

UTILIZATION

- It is easy to use it is taken in hand quickly (15 minutes is sufficient) is hardly necessary to the potash doc
- Everything is easy in this table while a silent think
- The manual is clear trs but I do not myself be used much.

SOUNDS

It has a trs good sound to my taste it in the tape not too sharp or too serious in it is simply perfect and gniale
do not kill the qualiseur compltement is cut rather than kill, but it catches up with the effects colors

OVERALL OPINION

- I bought it September 25, 2006
- I like everything in this table and more I find it pretty trs with all its little shining Lumire lol
- Before I mix on the gemini ouahhhh and ben! What a radical change have nothing to see is another approach to the mix.
- It is 1600 (although I pay 1115) but I think what it really is worth the good stuff of quality and robust +
- I do it again this choice without hsiter I'm really not that much of the purchase price to dpart rbuter me but as I troouver least CHRE Besides I am not Siter.

Now we understand why pioneer: the essence of the mix!!

I always buy something else but this year I decided that it will fly my mix cd + platinum.

It's true that when we seek the best or almost immediately revved up the €.

After TSB GEMINI NUMARK Behring ...

I am interested in products BY PIONEER DJ (required)

and I broke my pig (he used) for the DJM800.

THE ATOMIC BOMB and I do SERT only a few days!
SEEN IN TIME ...

Just a tip for other brands to copy the product and of course sell it cheaper than what the copy is often far from being a candle to the original!

UTILIZATION

IDEM

SOUNDS

IDEM

OVERALL OPINION

I agree he'll have a few possible improvements to the mixer but it is of the order detail.

Here I bought this table certainly a cheap Euro 1550 and yes, very expensive, but a great tool especially in the clubbing 4 channel with effects as good mixer effects is rare, I do not see in Anyway the vestax 580, and the Ecler Evo 5.

This table is rack yes, 4 channel mixer, the knobs are well placed and is very easy to use I have not had to read the manual, and solid!! Do not listen to the advice above, I say a good product you buy in a shop seriously easy to criticize you love or you do not like Pioneer.

Sampling is of 48-96 kHz, the cross fader is adjustable with different types of curves, side effects are not a pleindre 13 parametric effects, plus 4 subterfuges.
The great advantage of this table to quelqun that mix to great effect is to add an efx 1000 the possibilities become incalculable.

UTILIZATION

Super simple setup nothing to say I put the max for that, it is easily accessible, ben ben manual I do not know what it is infact since I used it.

SOUNDS

The console is very clear I have never had any problems of breath, the preamp is nikel no probs.

Now I have found that the effect Crush really is not beautiful, harmonic it is pointless to have two effects filter is a good idea I used a lot, just the reverse roll that is not m'enfin it is terrible in small details.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 9 months, I love everything on this table, I like some of the effects are finally happening, I tried before buying Rodec mx-330 DJX-700.

The value for money is a bit pricey but you pay Here is the pioneer brand.

With the experience I would do this choice is very good for me clubbing and life tables becaufe in a mixing effects at this price there's nothing.

The negative note the price.

- Yes, this table is rack

- This is a 4 channel mixer

- It has RCA & XLR

- A double effect is bote intgre in the table: the effects "standard" + the Pioneer Sound Color FX (it is possible to combine the effects)

- The table supports MIDI, with 61 paramtres

UTILIZATION

- Gnrale configuration is very simple: the buttons fall naturally to hand and are trs use is intuitive.

- The usual functions are well positioned trs.

- The manual is clear trs, but It is not necessary to read it as the intuitive use of this machine.

SOUNDS

- The console is trs transparent: in EXAGRES, I would say it makes a better sound than the sources used.

- There is absolutely no breath intreoduit this table.

- The equalizer trs is powerful, and its effectiveness is complte bote by the double effects.

OVERALL OPINION

- I use this table for a month.

- The details I like most on this table are:
- The quality of sound
- The quality and diversity effects
- The ease of use (intuitiva)
- Design

There is no particularity dplaise me specially.

- Before, I tried an Ecler Nuo 3, DNX (3 channels) & a Reloop (3 channels).

- The ratio quality price is good, because it is a product of high quality (professional equipment).

- With the exprience, I would do this choice, without any hsitation.

Good mixer really solid, we feel that the quality is there! I had a jcb nos before 2010, so nothing to do .. this is the first time I buy a Pioneer mixer and high-end new! Its really pleased to have material like that in the hands .. it becomes a real pleasure to mix by spending hours of time without realizing it ..! I like the power output, we see that there are many performance effects are also very good and powerful I think (the flanger, phaser very simpa) effects on the microphone are also really great, once the table in hand, you can really do anything .. combination of effects etc! You just have good quality speakers behind with possibly asser powerful subwoofer .. and, it explodes! I used both for parties of 300 people or a quiet evening with pals 10. The price of course is still very expensive for a mixer 1500euros .. it is on, once it has been good, but to buy it must still have the means .. Here, I am completely satisfied with this mixer, even if I not use any effects ...

UTILIZATION

well.

SOUNDS

very good, not breathing

OVERALL OPINION

8 months

Beat Effects Delay, Echo, Reverse Delay, Pan, Trnace, Filter, Flanger, Phaser, Reverb, Robot, Chorus, Roll, Reverse Roll

Harmonic effects, Sweep, Crush, Filter

Control MIDI / MIDI HID Controls (61 fully assignable)

Number of Channels 4

Frequency / sampling depth 96 kHz / 24-bit digital mixer
* 3-band Equalizer by ~ 6 -26
* Rotary Faders Optional
* Level Meter Individual segments 15

* CD / LINE Input (RCA) 5
* Enter PHONO (RCA) 3
* S / PDIF Digital Input (RCA) 4
* MIC Input (XLR) 1
* MIC Input (6.35) a
* RETURN (6.35) a

* Master Output (XLR) 1
* Master Output (RCA) 1
* Output (Jack 6.35) 1 (TRS)
* Rec Out (RCA) 1
* Digital output (coaxial) 1 (48 kHz or 96 kHz)
* Digital Output (RCA) 1 x (SP / DIF) (48kHz or 96kHz)
* Send (Jack 6.35) a
* Booth Monitor Yes

Mic Connection Neutrik Combo # (x 2), Phone (x1)
# 2 band Mic EQ
# Band Mic EQ -6 to +6 dB
Talkover Switch # 3 positions
# Auto Talkover

* Dimensions (L x W x D) 320 x 108 x 381 mm
Weight 8 kg
* Power consumption 30 Watt
* SN Ratio: Line 105 dB
* SN Ratio: Phono 88 dB
* SN Ratio: Mic 84 dB
* Harmonic Distortion 0.005%
* Crosstalk: Line 82 dB dB

UTILIZATION

Basic table very easy to use. the manual is clear all the functions are easily accessible once identified and managed

SOUNDS

The lack of "punch" compared to a Rodec Xone92 or A & H.

No blows on the master, light on the return (booth)
3 bands equalizer cut very low.

OVERALL OPINION

* How long have you use it? + - 3 years
* What is so special that you love the most, the easier everyone found there, although the effects complete and accurate,

less? Headphone replaced 2 times already and seen the interior quality is really poor (headphones), I'm not the only one to use (rental) I'm not always there to check the delicacy of the DJs, but this type of product especially for the price I expected better.

* Have you tried many other models before buying it?
not before but compared with Rodec - more punch, its much more beautiful, clean, round without additional EQ.
A & H Xone 3D/92, melted much cleaner,

* How would you rate the quality / price? "I say, money, too expensive,
too Life is priceless " but Pioneer still had abused the other shot is aligned such models 4 tracks

* With experience, you do again this choice? ...

Mixed feelings

see on any site to the characteristics

UTILIZATION

Use simple, it must be or must be missing may be the "kill", but the knob down very low.

SOUNDS

Rca plugged into the sound is OK, a little breath on the back, but the return is not for the public ...

OVERALL OPINION

I have 2 years, do not worry until ^ present, I like the double-effect box, efficient syur techno, jump, trance or the like.


Pioneer will always be expensive ...
I tested numark (High Quality) and I had the pleasure of testing a xone92 and it's true that this noise n'zest not the same thing .... to see next to each portfolio and its use

For all that, I bring you the manual. Otherwise, the connectors: RCA for line / phono inputs / digital
XLR and RCA outputs for Master Jack, and finally to return and the departure / return external effect.
Micro Combo Jack / XLR

UTILIZATION

The config is very simple as long as one knows a little usability Pioneer at the outcome level.
The rest is a classic table rather well thought everything falls quickly at hand.

The manual is sufficiently clear and complete.

The usual function are all instantly accessible.

SOUNDS

The sound is OK, although I think it lacks a bit of potato. Depending on the use that may interfere (this is why I sold). It is much better than the DJM600, for cons I think the DJM700 is inflated low.
There is no breath, she does not saturate even if it's never good to push a bottom.
The does not fully equalize the frequencies ... So after all depends on what one seeks.
The effects are good quality, most effective and quick to use.

OVERALL OPINION

I had it for 3 years but I still use it very often in clubs.
I tried a lot of other models: the low end when I started, and Denon DN-X1500, which is much like the 800 but I find less ergonomic.
I mixed most of the range of Pioneer (300,350,400,600,700,800) and the advantage is that people come here right away.
Ecler NUO5 (I did not like because I feel bad settings ahead of the table)
Now I have a Xone 42 because I love simple, sound great, beautiful filters and since I did not use too the effects of the Pioneer, I preferred a better sound and a potato.

What I like most: Ergonomics without a doubt, the quality, impact and connectivity, as well as the resistance of the faders is (to my taste) perfect (but the race is short)
What I like least: The lack of potatoes (it is obviously necessary to compare it with another ... if you do not realize it). Otherwise there is not much to throw on the table.

It is expensive ... For half the price it was a Xone 42, but with no effect filter sick. But well after the next "all-in-one" is also appreciable, and then it's still a high-end table.
With the experience of so many, I changed for my personal use but otherwise I'm very happy to find it in the club

see other opinions

UTILIZATION

very easy to use and clear the dial display is large enough and read distinctly informations.Le manual itself is boring and not a consular browse the tout.Il is large and does not hurt the eyes.

SOUNDS

I'm not super stall but I find the quality of the gear more than correct, the are is clean and clear I believe that what matters, but maybe the punch changes everything?? Indeed the equalizer does not cut the sound completely, which is commême damage, especially for serious cons For they have just the right resistance when turning the knob which is very pleasant when one quibble though and they respect the level of scale which allows you to enter a very subtle mix and mix the sons.On between sound more distinctly with such insipid. I 've no breath.

OVERALL OPINION

So I absolutely agree that the price is totally abused me, I have buy 1100 euro (introductory offer but I 'did not know). I do not think I would have been able to give 1500.Le problem C is that this product works very well, so why lower the price? On the other hand Pioneer is a safe bet, I 'want to prove that I have purchased almost 3 years ago and I use it every day casi almost despite the dust it does not move the faders are always retained a bit even though I am careful not to hit too dedans.Dommage to have put the coming of the headphone above his ruin me every time my cable more often I bump by turning the headset volume is Just to be rated.
In conclusion, given the time that I have already run over and the real pleasure that I 'did I really regret it, but really the price ????, guys I like very much all small indicator light that flashes, the canon in the dark.

I use a DJM 800 for 1 year and before it was mounted before the boards of Deauville, she turned at least 3 years continuously in the box, result:
change all the pots without exception! (These are traditional pots ALPS)
After Service is mad she left like new!
This table is certainly great, terrible effects, a reliability (even champagne!), A clean output, the reference is serious!
BUT it is shameful to DJM 800 if paid a dear! if it is to have pots of RS in a 2 euro was inside the pots!
He could still make an effort!
Anyway I can assure you it's the same with denon!
Yes I would do if he is choosing to put the pots stronger (type Penny & Gilles)
I keep the same speech to the 500 and 600!
But that's how good and that's it !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

simplisime

OVERALL OPINION

◦ For how long have you been using it?
my godfather was so, as we often mix together it has been about 10 months (before he had the 600)

◦ Did you try many other models before getting this one?
djm 600, djm 400, Behringer DJX 700, x-trem 1 SYNQ

◦ What thing do you like most/least about it?
The +: box impeccable effect, a second box under the effect pototiomètres which is also great to share an effect so I can not remember the name (I think harmonic), the faders solid and enjoyable to use, the screen bpm counter and choice of effect (there are 4 types by purpose), accurate bpm counter, rubber knobs (but good to see if they would evont not degrade over time), when precise faders down the bass is heard (quite different than my DJX 700!, design, precise VU meter (it also changes my DJX!), sound quality very good quality, ease of use
The -: bpm counter a bit long at times (but it is very accurate but good ear is the best way), the price per cons I think it's very over-estimated it is certainly a excellent table but for what it is € 1500 is expensive, pay twice the djm 600 is too exaggerated, so it is not much better than the 600 it is better of course, but that it is 2x more expensive no I do not agree

◦ What is your opinion about the value for the price?
A new € 900/1000 it would have been more suitable

◦ Knowing what you know now, would you make the same choice? ...
I would wait it down at least 500 € for € 1500 it is expensive anyway, for 750 € less I would rather buy a 600 anyway for 850 € or less the Denon DNX-1500

See previous review

Rather complete damage that it disappoints as usual solidity level.
Pioneer has yet laid a beautiful table keke as they know them so well does not forget the super long and painful Service and the exorbitant price of the rooms as usual.


UTILIZATION

Obviously s is the pioneer of ergonomics and appointment.
S 'is in fact the best thing that they do well in their trash ergonomics.
Would that we think of quality of materials, provided their table because its not fly high.
I 'm Knob explains the gain of the game have made her afraid by the way, and fader are of dubious quality.

SOUNDS

the equalizer - yes they do it effectively removes nevertheless not totally unlike my frequency NUO5

For the rest see the previous review


OVERALL OPINION

I use it for a very few tps I buy second hand.

I have a pioneer and frankly ecler NUO5 s' is always the same.
Qualiter below the other and you pay the triple of a good table.
Okay it is digital the sound is correct for once it was finally gst
The faders are not worth my NUO5.
Its still a table with Mickey more light level meter that a trail of atterisage.
Nevertheless s' is a reference fortunately the digital outputs and the quality of sound + the two boxes are indeed was the justification for such a price if I will have to buy. I have already had the pioneer djm djm 500 and 707 which was the most correct of any I find without being extraordinary except for the crossfader djm 800 and this displeases me most in terms of value for money I totally abusing everyone who complains bought it new.

Frankly the only interest to possess it 's is to have the same stuff that if canned
ECLEER and Allen & Heath or rodec or a rane empath s' is something else carrement level of solidity and quality component.
Fortunately I just succeed THE EXCHANGE cons rodec a 180 MK3 and the sound s is something that a digital pio. go see my opinion on this wonder for those who do not know the beast.

https://fr.audiofanzine.com/console-dj/rodec/MX180MK3/avis/

for characteristics to reach the site of pioneer

UTILIZATION

yes hyper simple manual I did not read and functions are very well thought

SOUNDS

yes quite equalizer is correct for breath all depends on the cables that are used I read some reviews and I think they are a little hard everyone say it lacks bass this is especially true if one branch Digital turntables cd but if you branch with RCA cables (not digital) Brand monster I can tell you that it has nothing to do and this is true for all other branches (amplifiers, speakers, boxes of effects ...) Monster cables offer an incomparable sound and they are reinforced and very good insulation professionals Elsewhere scene uses this brand and I personally have no breath though for some there is see the connections that are often bad bill I had cable brand and I can breath.

OVERALL OPINION

3 years yes (djm 600, gemini, ecler ...) as the dual effects box and the sound was improved relative to the DJM600, the less fragile potentiometers. For the price it is expensive especially as there are tables of different brands that have better sound and at a lower cost. But I do it again this choice with your eyes closed.