View other reviews for this product:
elcascador
Published on 03/18/08 at 09:54
CHARACTERISTICS: I know the only monitor proximity of three-way tri-amplified existing. Rponses frquencielle, impulse, momentum and spatial near-perfect.
Usage: home studio monitoring, costs hifi, home-cinema
Config: Stro, standing in an area of acoustics mdiocre (shame!)
SOUNDS
Let's be clear: one approaches the best sound that money can buy in a configuration costs of proximity.
Previous compared with my costs, Dynaudio BM6A home:
- I never difficulty in clearly identifying a bass line, even trs deep, despite the acoustics of my local mdiocre (which never ceases to amaze me enjoyable)
- Dynamic changes in the ears pop as if they taient "amplified"
- Vocals, guitars, pianos sound with astounding clarity and naturalness scary (probably thanks to the DME medium)
- The implementation phase is stupfiante, to the point that one recognizes IMMEDIATE MP3 @ 320kps from the original
- Treble so silky and thin and we could laugh so any apparent distortion
OVERALL OPINION
I use them for three months.
THE FIRST A costs at Univers Sons, I stopped breathing ...
What I like most: O300 possde sound the clearest, most powerful, sharper and bolder than I heard. Yes, all this time.
What I like least (fawn to speak): the max level in the bass is not huge, compare the overall power of the sound. In a proximity configuration this poses no problem. Configuration average distance (between 2 and 3m) may become limiting if the track really kick a large uncompressed trs. We speak of the volume consquent trs, @ 40Hz or lower.
Simply put, the sound O300 as a cost of high power, but still insufficient to Ralite stick to a wall eaters his most bitter!
I tried other models, including ADAM, Genelec, the new Dynaudio, Focal and ... Some of these almost Galenti MODELS K & H in some areas (dynamic, deep bass ,...), but not in all.
The report is qualitprix cohrent: we get a quality worth the 3000-3500 K (depending on options) countries for a pair.
Yes, I would do the same choice, with five years in advance so it's impossible to take them into default!
Usage: home studio monitoring, costs hifi, home-cinema
Config: Stro, standing in an area of acoustics mdiocre (shame!)
SOUNDS
Let's be clear: one approaches the best sound that money can buy in a configuration costs of proximity.
Previous compared with my costs, Dynaudio BM6A home:
- I never difficulty in clearly identifying a bass line, even trs deep, despite the acoustics of my local mdiocre (which never ceases to amaze me enjoyable)
- Dynamic changes in the ears pop as if they taient "amplified"
- Vocals, guitars, pianos sound with astounding clarity and naturalness scary (probably thanks to the DME medium)
- The implementation phase is stupfiante, to the point that one recognizes IMMEDIATE MP3 @ 320kps from the original
- Treble so silky and thin and we could laugh so any apparent distortion
OVERALL OPINION
I use them for three months.
THE FIRST A costs at Univers Sons, I stopped breathing ...
What I like most: O300 possde sound the clearest, most powerful, sharper and bolder than I heard. Yes, all this time.
What I like least (fawn to speak): the max level in the bass is not huge, compare the overall power of the sound. In a proximity configuration this poses no problem. Configuration average distance (between 2 and 3m) may become limiting if the track really kick a large uncompressed trs. We speak of the volume consquent trs, @ 40Hz or lower.
Simply put, the sound O300 as a cost of high power, but still insufficient to Ralite stick to a wall eaters his most bitter!
I tried other models, including ADAM, Genelec, the new Dynaudio, Focal and ... Some of these almost Galenti MODELS K & H in some areas (dynamic, deep bass ,...), but not in all.
The report is qualitprix cohrent: we get a quality worth the 3000-3500 K (depending on options) countries for a pair.
Yes, I would do the same choice, with five years in advance so it's impossible to take them into default!