Log in
Log in

or

Thread Best Operating System (OS) to work with Audio

  • 6 replies
  • 6 participants
  • 6,047 views
  • 0 follower
aureliobrasil

aureliobrasil

16 posts
New AFfiliate
First post
1 Posted on 02/14/2004 at 07:57:08
Hi everybody,
This is topic for you and everyone who wants to helps tellingand (if possible) explaining why:

Which Operating System (OS) is better to run a dedicated audio system, with sequencer, virtual synths, sampler, etc..??

Give your hand

Aurelio.
calcappone

calcappone

10 posts
New AFfiliate
2 Posted on 02/15/2004 at 07:46:02
Right now the best OS for Audio would be Windows 98 SE. It has the most compatibity with audio drivers and hardware. When the driver support improves, Go with WIN XP. Its more stable and supports NTFS file system for added security and performance
pax

pax

98 posts
AFfable Poster
3 Posted on 02/17/2004 at 13:13:56
hi again,
for audio, xp is the best. Format drive C NTFS file system for all your programs, vst instruments included.The other drives where you will keep your audio and midi and sound files, use FAT 32 system.By install from scratch use f5 by the first reboot and choose standard pc instead off ACPI, so your soundcard will get an exclusive IRQ port.

chris at www.tsunamimusic.be
keylord

keylord

7 posts
New AFfiliate
4 Posted on 02/25/2004 at 01:54:36
I tried to use both FAT32 and NTFS and I haven't found better performance in stability or in latency (2.66 ms effective in the two cases)....

in my audio card drivers guide (kx driver for audigy) I also find that it doesn't matter....
rickjohns

rickjohns

3 posts
New AFfiliate
5 Posted on 03/19/2004 at 22:09:31
XP hands down is the winner. Especially with a good intel board, A P4, and Sonar 3.
Spectre

Spectre

11 posts
New AFfiliate
6 Posted on 08/12/2004 at 03:17:36
Hey folks,

I notice some enthusiasm for XP, but I've had a lot of troubles with it (some musical, and some video problems - i.e. my camcorder is a nightmare on XP but was better on ME!) My main problems with music were that my motherboard has on-board sound, I have a decent soundcard and I also have a Bluetooth dongle. Even if I disable the onboard sound in the BIOS, Cubase still tries to use it. And when I finally disable it within system devices, Cubase will only let me use the Bluetooth audio. Finally, when I physically remove the dongle, Cubase lets me use my decent soundcard! I'm never given a choice over which one to use.

I never had any of these sorts of problems on 98SE or Me. Does anyone else have issues with XP, or am I just cursed? :(

By the way, I know nothing about Macs, but a friend has told me that Mac OS is a much better platform for recording music. How do you guys rate it against 98SE and XP for stability and performance?

Cheers folks!

Simon
pax

pax

98 posts
AFfable Poster
7 Posted on 08/28/2004 at 14:30:14
Xp tuning.
go to; www.pcmus.com
regards pax
cookies
We are using cookies!

Yes, Audiofanzine is using cookies. Since the last thing that we want is disturbing your diet with too much fat or too much sugar, you'll be glad to learn that we made them ourselves with fresh, organic and fair ingredients, and with a perfect nutritional balance. What this means is that the data we store in them is used to enhance your use of our website as well as improve your user experience on our pages and show you personalised ads (learn more). To configure your cookie preferences, click here.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent
These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine and allow its optimization. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Example: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).
Google Analytics
We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it.
Advertising
This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest. We are likely to display advertisements from our own platform, from Google Advertising Products or from Adform.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent

These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Examples: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).

Google Analytics

We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it. When this parameter is activated, no personal information is sent to Google and the IP addresses are anonymized.

Advertising

This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest. We are likely to display advertisements from our own platform, from Google Advertising Products or from Adform.


You can find more details on data protection in our privacy policy.
You can also find information about how Google uses personal data by following this link.